Literature DB >> 27364612

Keeping you at arm's length: modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance.

F Quesque1, G Ruggiero2, S Mouta3,4, J Santos5,3,6, T Iachini2, Y Coello7.   

Abstract

Peripersonal space represents the area around the body where objects are coded in motor terms for the purpose of voluntary goal-directed actions. Previous studies have suggested that peripersonal space is also a safe space linked with our private area, influencing interpersonal space in social contexts. However, whether these two spaces rely on similar embodied processes remains an open issue. In the present study, participants observed a point-light walker (PLW) approaching them from different directions and passing near them at different distances from their right or left shoulder. While approaching, the PLW disappeared at a distance of 2 m and the task for the participants was to estimate if the interpersonal distance, at the time the PLW would have reached their level, was comfortable or not. Between two sessions of comfort judgments, the participants manipulated a 70 cm tool entailing an extension of peripersonal space, or a 10 cm tool entailing no extension of peripersonal space. The results revealed that the comfortable interpersonal distance was larger when the PLW crossed the mid-sagittal plane of the participants than when it approached them laterally, with a concomitant increase of response time. After participants manipulated the long tool, comfortable interpersonal distance increased, but predominantly when the PLW trajectory implied crossing the participants' mid-sagittal plane. This effect was not observed when participants manipulated the short tool. Two control tasks showed that using the long tool modified the reachability (control 1), but not the time to passage (control 2) estimates of PLW stimuli, suggesting that tool use extended peripersonal space without changing perceived visual distances. Overall, the data show that comfortable interpersonal distance is linked to the representation of peripersonal space. As a consequence, increasing peripersonal space through tool use has the immediate consequence that comfortable interpersonal distance from another person also increases, suggesting that interpersonal-comfort space and peripersonal-reaching space share a common motor nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27364612     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0782-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  32 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

2.  Tool perception suppresses 10-12Hz μ rhythm of EEG over the somatosensory area.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Ettore Ambrosini; Gaetano Tieri; Corrado Sinigaglia; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent.

Authors:  Yannick Wamain; François Gabrielli; Yann Coello
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action.

Authors:  Yann Coello; Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2007-08-28

7.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Francesca Frassinetti; Claudio Brozzoli; Christian Urquizar; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The time to passage of biological and complex motion.

Authors:  Sandra Mouta; Jorge A Santos; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Body space in social interactions: a comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Tina Iachini; Yann Coello; Francesca Frassinetti; Gennaro Ruggiero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces.

Authors:  Gennaro Ruggiero; Francesca Frassinetti; Yann Coello; Mariachiara Rapuano; Armando Schiano di Cola; Tina Iachini
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-10-26

2.  The influence of threat on perceived spatial distance to out-group members.

Authors:  Chiara Fini; Pieter Verbeke; Sophie Sieber; Agnes Moors; Marcel Brass; Oliver Genschow
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-06

3.  The Prediction of Impact of a Looming Stimulus onto the Body Is Subserved by Multisensory Integration Mechanisms.

Authors:  Justine Cléry; Olivier Guipponi; Soline Odouard; Serge Pinède; Claire Wardak; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Anisotropy of lateral peripersonal space is linked to handedness.

Authors:  Lise Hobeika; Isabelle Viaud-Delmon; Marine Taffou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Gigliotti; Patrícia Soares Coelho; Joana Coutinho; Yann Coello
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-09-06

6.  Wearing a Mask Shapes Interpersonal Space during COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Monica Biggio; Ambra Bisio; Valentina Bruno; Francesca Garbarini; Marco Bove
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

7.  A comparative evaluation of the four measurement methods for comfort and reachability distance perceptions.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Lee; Xiaoqing Yu; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-10-18

8.  Altered Peripersonal Space and the Bodily Self in Schizophrenia: A Virtual Reality Study.

Authors:  Hyeon-Seung Lee; Seok-Jin J Hong; Tatiana Baxter; Jason Scott; Sunil Shenoy; Lauren Buck; Bobby Bodenheimer; Sohee Park
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Idiosyncratic representation of peripersonal space depends on the success of one's own motor actions, but also the successful actions of others!

Authors:  Yann Coello; François Quesque; Maria-Francesca Gigliotti; Laurent Ott; Jean-Luc Bruyelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context.

Authors:  Alice Cartaud; Gennaro Ruggiero; Laurent Ott; Tina Iachini; Yann Coello
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.