Literature DB >> 22371437

The time to passage of biological and complex motion.

Sandra Mouta1, Jorge A Santos, Joan López-Moliner.   

Abstract

A significant part of human interactions occur with other human beings and not only with inanimate objects. It is important in everyday tasks to estimate the time it takes other people to reach (time to contact) or pass us (time to passage). Surprisingly, little is known about judging time to contact or time to passage of biological or other complex motions. In two experiments, rigid and non-rigid (biological, inverted, scrambled, and complex non-biological) motion conditions were compared in a time-to-passage judgment task. Subjects could judge time to passage of point-light-walker displays. However, due to relative and opponent movements of body parts, all articulated patterns conveyed a noisier looming pattern. Non-rigid stimuli were judged as passing sooner than rigid stimuli but reflected more uncertainty in the judgments as revealed by precision judgments and required longer reaction times. Our findings suggested that perceptual judgments for complex motion, including biological patterns, are built on top of the same processing channels that are involved on rigid motion perception. The complexity of the motion pattern (rigid vs. non-rigid) plays a more determinant role than the "biologicity" of the stimulus (biological vs. non-biological), at least concerning time-to-passage judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371437     DOI: 10.1167/12.2.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  4 in total

1.  Effects of speeding up or slowing down animate or inanimate motions on timing.

Authors:  Mauro Carrozzo; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Keeping you at arm's length: modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance.

Authors:  F Quesque; G Ruggiero; S Mouta; J Santos; T Iachini; Y Coello
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 3.  How long did it last? You would better ask a human.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Mauro Carrozzo; Andrea d'Avella; Barbara La Scaleia; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context.

Authors:  Alice Cartaud; Gennaro Ruggiero; Laurent Ott; Tina Iachini; Yann Coello
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.