Literature DB >> 31493049

Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females.

Maria Francesca Gigliotti1, Patrícia Soares Coelho1,2, Joana Coutinho2, Yann Coello3.   

Abstract

The peripersonal space (PPS) is a multisensory representation of the near-body region of space where objects appear at hand. It also represents a buffer zone protecting the body from external threats and as such it contributes to the organization of social interactions. However, how the combination of embodied objects processing and constraints inherent to social interactions contributes to PPS representation remains an open issue. By using a cooperative task where two male (N = 22) or female (N = 18) participants, sharing the same action space, were requested to select a number of stimuli on a touch-screen table, we investigated the effect of non-uniform distribution of reward-yielding stimuli on selection strategy and perceptual judgments of reachability, used as a proxy of PPS representation. The probability to select a reward-yielding stimulus (50% of the stimuli) was 75% in the proximal space of one of the two confederates. Results showed that participants initially prioritized stimuli in their proximal space and were progressively influenced by the spatial distribution of reward-yielding stimuli, thus invading their confederate's action space when associated with higher probability of reward. The distribution of reward-yielding stimuli led to an increase of reachability threshold, but only when biased towards the participants' distal space. Although the invasion of others' PPS was more pronounced in male participants, the biased distribution of reward-yielding stimuli altered the reachability threshold similarly in males and females. As a whole, the data revealed that reward expectations in relation to motor actions influence both PPS exploration and representation in social context, but differently in males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31493049     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01242-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  44 in total

1.  What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: comment on Cross and Madson (1997)

Authors:  R F Baumeister; K L Sommer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations.

Authors:  Michela Bassolino; Alessandra Finisguerra; Elisa Canzoneri; Andrea Serino; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations.

Authors:  Elisa Canzoneri; Silvia Ubaldi; Valentina Rastelli; Alessandra Finisguerra; Michela Bassolino; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space.

Authors:  Jérémy Bourgeois; Alessandro Farnè; Yann Coello
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-02-01

5.  Implied threat and the territorial factor in personal space.

Authors:  K G Bailey; J J Hartnett; F W Gibson
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1972-02

6.  Interpersonal spacing in natural settings.

Authors:  J C Baxter
Journal:  Sociometry       Date:  1970-12

7.  When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema.

Authors:  L Cardinali; C Brozzoli; C Urquizar; R Salemme; A C Roy; A Farnè
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Past rewards capture spatial attention and action choices.

Authors:  E Camara; S Manohar; M Husain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  An Action Field Theory of Peripersonal Space.

Authors:  Rory J Bufacchi; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Mind the Depth: Visual Perception of Shapes Is Better in Peripersonal Space.

Authors:  Elvio Blini; Clément Desoche; Romeo Salemme; Alexandre Kabil; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-10-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Self-partner inclusion predicts performance of romantically involved individuals in a body-scaled action-anticipation task.

Authors:  Cédric A Bouquet; Melissa Lafleur; Virginie Quintard; Stéphane Jouffre; Yannick Wamain; Yann Coello; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Interrelation Between Peripersonal Action Space and Interpersonal Social Space: Psychophysiological Evidence and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Yann Coello; Alice Cartaud
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Frontal and parietal background connectivity and their dynamic changes account for individual differences in the multisensory representation of peripersonal space.

Authors:  Stefania Della Penna; Francesca Ferri; Sara Spadone; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Giulio Di Cosmo; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Peripersonal Space from a multisensory perspective: the distinct effect of the visual and tactile components of Visuo-Tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Maddalena Beccherle; Stefania Facchetti; Francesca Villani; Marzia Zanini; Michele Scandola
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance.

Authors:  K Kühne; M H Fischer; M A Jeglinski-Mende
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Gradual exposure to Coriolis force induces sensorimotor adaptation with no change in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Nicolas X Leclere; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Yann Coello; Christophe Bourdin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.