Literature DB >> 22349501

Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Lucilla Cardinali1, Stéphane Jacobs, Claudio Brozzoli, Francesca Frassinetti, Alice C Roy, Alessandro Farnè.   

Abstract

Along the evolutionary history, humans have reached a high level of sophistication in the way they interact with the environment. One important step in this process has been the introduction of tools, enabling humans to go beyond the boundaries of their physical possibilities. Here, we focus on some "low level" aspects of sensorimotor processing that highlight how tool-use plays a causal role in shaping body representations, an essential plastic feature for efficient motor control during development and skilful tool-use in the adult life. We assess the evidence supporting the hypothesis that tools are incorporated in body representation for action, which is the body schema, by critically reviewing some previous findings and providing new data from on-going work in our laboratory. In particular, we discuss several experiments that reveal the effects of tool-use both on the kinematics of hand movements and the localization of somatosensory stimuli on the body surface, as well as the conditions that are necessary for these effects to be manifested. We suggest that overall these findings speak in favour of genuine tool-use-dependent plasticity of the body representation for the control of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22349501     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3028-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  78 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

2.  Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; G Terlinden; M Mühlau; G Goldenberg; A M Wohlschläger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Francesca Frassinetti; Claudio Brozzoli; Christian Urquizar; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Somatosensory properties of neurons in the superior parietal cortex (area 5) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  H Sakata; Y Takaoka; A Kawarasaki; H Shibutani
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-12-21       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism.

Authors:  A G Greenwald
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Body schema and body image--pros and cons.

Authors:  Frederique de Vignemont
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Chimpanzees' context-dependent tool use provides evidence for separable representations of hand and tool even during active use within peripersonal space.

Authors:  Daniel J Povinelli; James E Reaux; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  How many motoric body representations can we grasp?

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joyce A Kootker; Hinze Hogendoorn; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceiving transformed movements when using tools.

Authors:  Christine Sutter; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  What a car does to your perception: Distance evaluations differ from within and outside of a car.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Hartmut Zoppke; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

4.  The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Francesca Ciardo; Simone Panajoli; Luisa Lugli; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

6.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Long- but not short-term tool-use changes hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Jason P Schacher; Cory Scammel; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Different tool training induces specific effects on body metric representation.

Authors:  Daniele Romano; Elena Uberti; Pietro Caggiano; Gianna Cocchini; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering with single-molecule sensitivity using a plasmonic Fano resonance.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Yu-Rong Zhen; Oara Neumann; Jared K Day; Peter Nordlander; Naomi J Halas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Opposing force fields induce direction-specific sensorimotor adaptation but a non-specific perceptual shift consistent with a contraction of peripersonal space representation.

Authors:  Nicolas X Leclere; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Yann Coello; Christophe Bourdin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.