RATIONALE: The effects of c-kit(POS) cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs, and adult cell therapy in general) on left ventricular (LV) function have been regarded as modest or inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 3 CPC infusions have greater efficacy than 1 infusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats with a 30-day-old myocardial infarction received 1 or 3 CPC infusions into the LV cavity, 35 days apart. Compared with vehicle-treated rats, the single-dose group exhibited improved LV function after the first infusion (consisting of CPCs) but not after the second and third (vehicle). In contrast, in the multiple-dose group, regional and global LV function improved by a similar degree after each CPC infusion, resulting in greater cumulative effects. For example, the total increase in LV ejection fraction was approximately triple in the multiple-dose group versus the single-dose group (P<0.01). The multiple-dose group also exhibited more viable tissue and less scar, less collagen in the risk and noninfarcted regions, and greater myocyte density in the risk region. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that repeated CPC administrations are markedly more effective than a single administration. The concept that the full effects of CPCs require repeated doses has significant implications for both preclinical and clinical studies; it suggests that the benefits of cell therapy may be underestimated or even overlooked if they are measured after a single dose, and that repeated administrations are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of a cell product properly. In addition, we describe a new method that enables studies of repeated cell administrations in rodents.
RATIONALE: The effects of c-kit(POS) cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs, and adult cell therapy in general) on left ventricular (LV) function have been regarded as modest or inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 3 CPC infusions have greater efficacy than 1 infusion. METHODS AND RESULTS:Rats with a 30-day-old myocardial infarction received 1 or 3 CPC infusions into the LV cavity, 35 days apart. Compared with vehicle-treated rats, the single-dose group exhibited improved LV function after the first infusion (consisting of CPCs) but not after the second and third (vehicle). In contrast, in the multiple-dose group, regional and global LV function improved by a similar degree after each CPC infusion, resulting in greater cumulative effects. For example, the total increase in LV ejection fraction was approximately triple in the multiple-dose group versus the single-dose group (P<0.01). The multiple-dose group also exhibited more viable tissue and less scar, less collagen in the risk and noninfarcted regions, and greater myocyte density in the risk region. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that repeated CPC administrations are markedly more effective than a single administration. The concept that the full effects of CPCs require repeated doses has significant implications for both preclinical and clinical studies; it suggests that the benefits of cell therapy may be underestimated or even overlooked if they are measured after a single dose, and that repeated administrations are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of a cell product properly. In addition, we describe a new method that enables studies of repeated cell administrations in rodents.
Authors: Dongming Hou; Eyas Al-Shaykh Youssef; Todd J Brinton; Ping Zhang; Pamela Rogers; Erik T Price; Alan C Yeung; Brian H Johnstone; Paul G Yock; Keith L March Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nikhil C Panda; Sean T Zuckerman; Olurotimi O Mesubi; David S Rosenbaum; Marc S Penn; J Kevin Donahue; Eben Alsberg; Kenneth R Laurita Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Michael Hofmann; Kai C Wollert; Gerd P Meyer; Alix Menke; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Wolfram H Knapp; Helmut Drexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Adam R Williams; Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Benjamin Addicott; Fred McCall; Decio Carvalho; Viky Suncion; Azorides R Morales; Jose Da Silva; Mark A Sussman; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John Terrovitis; Riikka Lautamäki; Michael Bonios; James Fox; James M Engles; Jianhua Yu; Michelle K Leppo; Martin G Pomper; Richard L Wahl; Jurgen Seidel; Benjamin M Tsui; Frank M Bengel; M Roselle Abraham; Eduardo Marbán Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Carla B Mellough; Qi Cui; Kirsty L Spalding; Natalie A Symons; Margaret A Pollett; Evan Y Snyder; Jeffrey D Macklis; Alan R Harvey Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Kelli I Korski; Dieter A Kubli; Bingyan J Wang; Farid G Khalafalla; Megan M Monsanto; Fareheh Firouzi; Oscar H Echeagaray; Taeyong Kim; Robert M Adamson; Walter P Dembitsky; Åsa B Gustafsson; Mark A Sussman Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Kristine Janssen; Dan Li Lin; Brett Hanzlicek; Kangli Deng; Brian M Balog; Carl H van der Vaart; Margot S Damaser Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2019-08-14
Authors: Megan M Monsanto; Kevin S White; Taeyong Kim; Bingyan J Wang; Kristina Fisher; Kelli Ilves; Farid G Khalafalla; Alexandria Casillas; Kathleen Broughton; Sadia Mohsin; Walter P Dembitsky; Mark A Sussman Journal: Circ Res Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Yiru Guo; Marcin Wysoczynski; Yibing Nong; Alex Tomlin; Xiaoping Zhu; Anna M Gumpert; Marjan Nasr; Senthikumar Muthusamy; Hong Li; Michael Book; Abdur Khan; Kyung U Hong; Qianhong Li; Roberto Bolli Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Timothy N Audam; Yibing Nong; Alex Tomlin; Andrea Jurkovic; Hong Li; Xiaoping Zhu; Bethany W Long; Yi Wei Zheng; Tyler Weirick; Kenneth R Brittian; Daniel W Riggs; Anna Gumpert; Shizuka Uchida; Yiru Guo; Marcin Wysoczynski; Steven P Jones Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 4.733