RATIONALE: The relative actions and synergism between distinct myocardial-derived stem cell populations remain obscure. Ongoing debates on optimal cell population(s) for treatment of heart failure prompted implementation of a protocol for isolation of multiple stem cell populations from a single myocardial tissue sample to develop new insights for achieving myocardial regeneration. OBJECTIVE: Establish a robust cardiac stem cell isolation and culture protocol to consistently generate 3 distinct stem cell populations from a single human heart biopsy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolation of 3 endogenous cardiac stem cell populations was performed from human heart samples routinely discarded during implantation of a left ventricular assist device. Tissue explants were mechanically minced into 1 mm3 pieces to minimize time exposure to collagenase digestion and preserve cell viability. Centrifugation removes large cardiomyocytes and tissue debris producing a single cell suspension that is sorted using magnetic-activated cell sorting technology. Initial sorting is based on tyrosine-protein kinase Kit (c-Kit) expression that enriches for 2 c-Kit+ cell populations yielding a mixture of cardiac progenitor cells and endothelial progenitor cells. Flowthrough c-Kit- mesenchymal stem cells are positively selected by surface expression of markers CD90 and CD105. After 1 week of culture, the c-Kit+ population is further enriched by selection for a CD133+ endothelial progenitor cell population. Persistence of respective cell surface markers in vitro is confirmed both by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Three distinct cardiac cell populations with individualized phenotypic properties consistent with cardiac progenitor cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and mesenchymal stem cells can be successfully concurrently isolated and expanded from a single tissue sample derived from human heart failure patients.
RATIONALE: The relative actions and synergism between distinct myocardial-derived stem cell populations remain obscure. Ongoing debates on optimal cell population(s) for treatment of heart failure prompted implementation of a protocol for isolation of multiple stem cell populations from a single myocardial tissue sample to develop new insights for achieving myocardial regeneration. OBJECTIVE: Establish a robust cardiac stem cell isolation and culture protocol to consistently generate 3 distinct stem cell populations from a single human heart biopsy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Isolation of 3 endogenous cardiac stem cell populations was performed from human heart samples routinely discarded during implantation of a left ventricular assist device. Tissue explants were mechanically minced into 1 mm3 pieces to minimize time exposure to collagenase digestion and preserve cell viability. Centrifugation removes large cardiomyocytes and tissue debris producing a single cell suspension that is sorted using magnetic-activated cell sorting technology. Initial sorting is based on tyrosine-protein kinase Kit (c-Kit) expression that enriches for 2 c-Kit+ cell populations yielding a mixture of cardiac progenitor cells and endothelial progenitor cells. Flowthrough c-Kit- mesenchymal stem cells are positively selected by surface expression of markers CD90 and CD105. After 1 week of culture, the c-Kit+ population is further enriched by selection for a CD133+ endothelial progenitor cell population. Persistence of respective cell surface markers in vitro is confirmed both by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Three distinct cardiac cell populations with individualized phenotypic properties consistent with cardiac progenitor cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and mesenchymal stem cells can be successfully concurrently isolated and expanded from a single tissue sample derived from humanheart failurepatients.
Authors: M Peichev; A J Naiyer; D Pereira; Z Zhu; W J Lane; M Williams; M C Oz; D J Hicklin; L Witte; M A Moore; S Rafii Journal: Blood Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: U M Gehling; S Ergün; U Schumacher; C Wagener; K Pantel; M Otte; G Schuch; P Schafhausen; T Mende; N Kilic; K Kluge; B Schäfer; D K Hossfeld; W Fiedler Journal: Blood Date: 2000-05-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Rupert Handgretinger; Paul R Gordon; Thasia Leimig; Xiaohua Chen; Hans-Jorg Buhring; Dietrich Niethammer; Selim Kuci Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Kelli I Korski; Dieter A Kubli; Bingyan J Wang; Farid G Khalafalla; Megan M Monsanto; Fareheh Firouzi; Oscar H Echeagaray; Taeyong Kim; Robert M Adamson; Walter P Dembitsky; Åsa B Gustafsson; Mark A Sussman Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Joshua Mayourian; Delaine K Ceholski; David M Gonzalez; Timothy J Cashman; Susmita Sahoo; Roger J Hajjar; Kevin D Costa Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Mark A Lampert; Amabel M Orogo; Rita H Najor; Babette C Hammerling; Leonardo J Leon; Bingyan J Wang; Taeyong Kim; Mark A Sussman; Åsa B Gustafsson Journal: Autophagy Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 16.016
Authors: Hannes Campo; Alina Murphy; Sule Yildiz; Teresa Woodruff; Irene Cervelló; J Julie Kim Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Maria A Mitry; Dimitri Laurent; Britny L Keith; Elizabeth Sira; Carol A Eisenberg; Leonard M Eisenberg; Sachindra Joshi; Sachin Gupte; John G Edwards Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 4.249