BACKGROUND: Because mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) induce proliferation and differentiation of c-kit(+) cardiac stem cells (CSCs) in vivo and in vitro, we hypothesized that combining human (h) MSCs with c-kit(+) hCSCs produces greater infarct size reduction compared with either cell administered alone after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Yorkshire swine underwent balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by reperfusion and were immunosuppressed after MI with cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. Intramyocardial combination hCSCs/hMSCs (1 million cells/200 million cells, n=5), hCSCs alone (1 million cells, n=5), hMSCs alone (200 million cells, n=5), or placebo (phosphate-buffered saline; n=5) was injected into the infarct border zones at 14 days after MI. Phenotypic response to cell therapy was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and micromanometer conductance catheterization hemodynamics. Although each cell therapy group had reduced MI size relative to placebo (P<0.05), the MI size reduction was 2-fold greater in combination versus either cell therapy alone (P<0.05). Accompanying enhanced MI size reduction were substantial improvement in left ventricular chamber compliance (end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; P<0.01) and contractility (preload recruitable stroke work and dP/dtmax; P<0.05) in combination-treated swine. Ejection fraction was restored to baseline in cell-treated pigs, whereas placebo pigs had persistently depressed left ventricular function (P<0.05). Immunohistochemistry showed 7-fold enhanced engraftment of stem cells in the combination therapy group versus either cell type alone (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combining hMSCs and hCSCs as a cell therapeutic enhances scar size reduction and restores diastolic and systolic function toward normal after MI. Taken together, these findings illustrate important biological interactions between c-kit(+) CSCs and MSCs that enhance cell-based therapeutic responses.
BACKGROUND: Because mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) induce proliferation and differentiation of c-kit(+) cardiac stem cells (CSCs) in vivo and in vitro, we hypothesized that combining human (h) MSCs with c-kit(+) hCSCs produces greater infarct size reduction compared with either cell administered alone after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Yorkshire swine underwent balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by reperfusion and were immunosuppressed after MI with cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. Intramyocardial combination hCSCs/hMSCs (1 million cells/200 million cells, n=5), hCSCs alone (1 million cells, n=5), hMSCs alone (200 million cells, n=5), or placebo (phosphate-buffered saline; n=5) was injected into the infarct border zones at 14 days after MI. Phenotypic response to cell therapy was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and micromanometer conductance catheterization hemodynamics. Although each cell therapy group had reduced MI size relative to placebo (P<0.05), the MI size reduction was 2-fold greater in combination versus either cell therapy alone (P<0.05). Accompanying enhanced MI size reduction were substantial improvement in left ventricular chamber compliance (end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; P<0.01) and contractility (preload recruitable stroke work and dP/dtmax; P<0.05) in combination-treated swine. Ejection fraction was restored to baseline in cell-treated pigs, whereas placebo pigs had persistently depressed left ventricular function (P<0.05). Immunohistochemistry showed 7-fold enhanced engraftment of stem cells in the combination therapy group versus either cell type alone (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combining hMSCs and hCSCs as a cell therapeutic enhances scar size reduction and restores diastolic and systolic function toward normal after MI. Taken together, these findings illustrate important biological interactions between c-kit(+) CSCs and MSCs that enhance cell-based therapeutic responses.
Authors: S De Mey; J D Thomas; N L Greenberg; P M Vandervoort; P R Verdonck Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Luciano C Amado; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Marcus St John; Jin-Sheng Xie; Stephen Cattaneo; Daniel J Durand; Torin Fitton; Jin Qiang Kuang; Garrick Stewart; Stephanie Lehrke; William W Baumgartner; Bradley J Martin; Alan W Heldman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M F Pittenger; A M Mackay; S C Beck; R K Jaiswal; R Douglas; J D Mosca; M A Moorman; D W Simonetti; S Craig; D R Marshak Journal: Science Date: 1999-04-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Dara L Kraitchman; Alan W Heldman; Ergin Atalar; Luciano C Amado; Bradley J Martin; Mark F Pittenger; Joshua M Hare; Jeff W M Bulte Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joshua M Hare; Joel E Fishman; Gary Gerstenblith; Darcy L DiFede Velazquez; Juan P Zambrano; Viky Y Suncion; Melissa Tracy; Eduard Ghersin; Peter V Johnston; Jeffrey A Brinker; Elayne Breton; Janice Davis-Sproul; Ivonne H Schulman; John Byrnes; Adam M Mendizabal; Maureen H Lowery; Didier Rouy; Peter Altman; Cheryl Wong Po Foo; Phillip Ruiz; Alexandra Amador; Jose Da Silva; Ian K McNiece; Alan W Heldman; Richard George; Albert Lardo Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Lauro M Takeuchi; Dieter Saur; Barbara Seidler; Susan M Dymecki; Jia Jia Mai; Ian A White; Wayne Balkan; Rosemeire M Kanashiro-Takeuchi; Andrew V Schally; Joshua M Hare Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael A Bellio; Claudia O Rodrigues; Ana Marie Landin; Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Jeffim Kuznetsov; Victoria Florea; Krystalenia Valasaki; Aisha Khan; Joshua M Hare; Ivonne Hernandez Schulman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Joshua K Salabei; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Candice R Holden; Qianhong Li; Kyung U Hong; Roberto Bolli; Aruni Bhatnagar; Bradford G Hill Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 6.277