INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been associated with reduced arrhythmias; however, the mechanism of this action is unknown. In addition, limited retention and survival of MSCs can significantly reduce efficacy. We hypothesized that MSCs can improve impulse conduction and that alginate hydrogel will enhance retention of MSCs in a model of healed myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four weeks after temporary occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), pigs (n = 13) underwent a sternotomy to access the infarct and then were divided into two studies. In study 1, designed to investigate impulse conduction, animals were administered, by border zone injection, 9-15 million MSCs (n = 7) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control MI, n = 5). Electrogram width measured in the border zone 2 weeks after injections was significantly decreased with MSCs (-30 ± 8 ms, p < 0.008) but not in shams (4 ± 10 ms, p = NS). Optical mapping from border zone tissue demonstrated that conduction velocity was higher in regions with MSCs (0.49 ± 0.03 m/s) compared to regions without MSCs (0.39 ± 0.03 m/s, p < 0.03). In study 2, designed to investigate MSC retention, animals were administered an equal number of MSCs suspended in either alginate (2 or 1 % w/v) or PBS (n = 6/group) by border zone injection. Greater MSC retention and survival were observed with 2% alginate compared to PBS or 1% alginate. Confocal immunofluorescence demonstrated that MSCs survive and are associated with expression of connexin-43 (Cx43) for either PBS (control), 1%, or 2% alginate. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we are able to directly associate MSCs with improved impulse conduction and increased retention and survival using an alginate scaffold in a clinically relevant model of healed MI.
INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been associated with reduced arrhythmias; however, the mechanism of this action is unknown. In addition, limited retention and survival of MSCs can significantly reduce efficacy. We hypothesized that MSCs can improve impulse conduction and that alginate hydrogel will enhance retention of MSCs in a model of healed myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four weeks after temporary occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), pigs (n = 13) underwent a sternotomy to access the infarct and then were divided into two studies. In study 1, designed to investigate impulse conduction, animals were administered, by border zone injection, 9-15 million MSCs (n = 7) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control MI, n = 5). Electrogram width measured in the border zone 2 weeks after injections was significantly decreased with MSCs (-30 ± 8 ms, p < 0.008) but not in shams (4 ± 10 ms, p = NS). Optical mapping from border zone tissue demonstrated that conduction velocity was higher in regions with MSCs (0.49 ± 0.03 m/s) compared to regions without MSCs (0.39 ± 0.03 m/s, p < 0.03). In study 2, designed to investigate MSC retention, animals were administered an equal number of MSCs suspended in either alginate (2 or 1 % w/v) or PBS (n = 6/group) by border zone injection. Greater MSC retention and survival were observed with 2% alginate compared to PBS or 1% alginate. Confocal immunofluorescence demonstrated that MSCs survive and are associated with expression of connexin-43 (Cx43) for either PBS (control), 1%, or 2% alginate. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we are able to directly associate MSCs with improved impulse conduction and increased retention and survival using an alginate scaffold in a clinically relevant model of healed MI.
Authors: Jamie L Ifkovits; Elena Tous; Masahito Minakawa; Masato Morita; J Daniel Robb; Kevin J Koomalsingh; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Jason A Burdick Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gerd P Meyer; Kai C Wollert; Joachim Lotz; Jan Steffens; Peter Lippolt; Stephanie Fichtner; Hartmut Hecker; Arnd Schaefer; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Henry Quevedo; Behzad N Oskouei; Qinghua Hu; Gary S Feigenbaum; Irene S Margitich; Ramesh Mazhari; Andrew J Boyle; Juan P Zambrano; Jose E Rodriguez; Raul Dulce; Pradip M Pattany; David Valdes; Concepcion Revilla; Alan W Heldman; Ian McNiece; Joshua M Hare Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Saïd F A Askar; Arti A Ramkisoensing; Douwe E Atsma; Martin J Schalij; Antoine A F de Vries; Daniël A Pijnappels Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-02-18
Authors: William R Mills; Niladri Mal; Farhad Forudi; Zoran B Popovic; Marc S Penn; Kenneth R Laurita Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Saskia L M A Beeres; Douwe E Atsma; Arnoud van der Laarse; Daniël A Pijnappels; John van Tuyn; Willem E Fibbe; Antoine A F de Vries; Dirk L Ypey; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-10-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mortimer Korf-Klingebiel; Tibor Kempf; Thomas Sauer; Eva Brinkmann; Philipp Fischer; Gerd P Meyer; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler; Kai C Wollert Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sonya B Seif-Naraghi; Jennifer M Singelyn; Michael A Salvatore; Kent G Osborn; Jean J Wang; Unatti Sampat; Oi Ling Kwan; G Monet Strachan; Jonathan Wong; Pamela J Schup-Magoffin; Rebecca L Braden; Kendra Bartels; Jessica A DeQuach; Mark Preul; Adam M Kinsey; Anthony N DeMaria; Nabil Dib; Karen L Christman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Marcello Rota; Jan Kajstura; Toru Hosoda; Claudia Bearzi; Serena Vitale; Grazia Esposito; Grazia Iaffaldano; M Elena Padin-Iruegas; Arantxa Gonzalez; Roberto Rizzi; Narissa Small; John Muraski; Roberto Alvarez; Xiongwen Chen; Konrad Urbanek; Roberto Bolli; Steven R Houser; Annarosa Leri; Mark A Sussman; Piero Anversa Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yiru Guo; Marcin Wysoczynski; Yibing Nong; Alex Tomlin; Xiaoping Zhu; Anna M Gumpert; Marjan Nasr; Senthikumar Muthusamy; Hong Li; Michael Book; Abdur Khan; Kyung U Hong; Qianhong Li; Roberto Bolli Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Riley A Suhar; Vanessa M Doulames; Yueming Liu; Meghan E Hefferon; Oscar Figueroa; Hana Buabbas; Sarah C Heilshorn Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 7.590
Authors: Santiago Correa; Abigail K Grosskopf; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Doreen Chan; Anthony C Yu; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Eric A Appel Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Meire S S Gonçalves; Eric Aian P Silva; Danillo M Santos; Izabel R Santana; Diego S Souza; Andreza M Araujo; Luana Heimfarth; Carla M L Vasconcelos; Vinícius C O Santos; Márcio R V Santos; Rosana de S S Barreto; Lucindo J Quintans Júnior; André S Barreto Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.000