Literature DB >> 1880508

MRI in the management of suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

P F Statham1, D M Hadley, P Macpherson, R A Johnston, I Bone, G M Teasdale.   

Abstract

One hundred and two patients with suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy were prospectively investigated using MRI as the initial imaging technique. The aim was to discover if clinicians could manage patients with MRI alone, or if they would find a second investigation necessary. Eighty two patients were managed using MRI alone, 34 of whom were treated surgically. Twenty patients had a second investigation: a myelogram in 18 and a CT myelogram in two. This was performed in nine patients to exclude structural pathology in the thoracic or lumbar region (which was not examined with MRI), and in 11 to obtain more specific information about the cervical region. Only five of these 20 patients had surgical treatment. The diagnosis changed after the second investigation in four patients, but management was not influenced in any of these. MRI is a satisfactory alternative to myelography for most patients with suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1880508      PMCID: PMC488583          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.54.6.484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  10 in total

1.  Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part I. General considerations and disk disease.

Authors:  D R Enzmann; J B Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disk herniation. Pre- and postoperative findings.

Authors:  E M Larsson; S Holtås; S Cronqvist; L Brandt
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Cervical spine MR imaging: generating high-signal CSF in sagittal and axial images.

Authors:  D R Enzmann; J B Rubin; A Wright
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The poor quality of early evaluations of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L S Cooper; T C Chalmers; M McCally; J Berrier; H S Sacks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in suspected lesions in the posterior cranial fossa.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; D M Hadley; A Lawrence; I Bone; H Burton; R Grant; B Condon; P Macpherson; J Rowan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-05

6.  Cervical radiculopathy: prospective evaluation with surface coil MR imaging, CT with metrizamide, and metrizamide myelography.

Authors:  M T Modic; T J Masaryk; G P Mulopulos; C Bundschuh; J S Han; H Bohlman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  0.6 T MR imaging of the cervical spine: multislice and multiecho techniques.

Authors:  R A Hyman; J H Edwards; S J Vacirca; H L Stein
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Cervical radiculopathy: value of oblique MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; T J Masaryk; J S Ross; G P Mulopulos; C V Bundschuh; H Bohlman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Cervical myelopathy: a comparison of magnetic resonance and myelography.

Authors:  T J Masaryk; M T Modic; M A Geisinger; J Standefer; R W Hardy; F Boumphrey; P M Duchesneau
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Iohexol versus iopamidol for cervical myelography: a randomised double blind study.

Authors:  P Macpherson; E Teasdale; C Coutinho; A McGeorge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  [Imaging cervical myelo- and radiculopathy].

Authors:  C Roth; P Papanagiotou; C Krick; W Reith; I Q Grunwald
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.