Literature DB >> 27341287

Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.

E Dall'Ara1, R Eastell2, M Viceconti3, D Pahr4, L Yang2.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures are a major clinical problem and current diagnostic tools have an accuracy of only 50%. The aim of this study was to validate dual energy X-rays absorptiometry (DXA)-based finite element (FE) models to predict femoral strength in two loading configurations. Thirty-six pairs of fresh frozen human proximal femora were scanned with DXA and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). For each pair one femur was tested until failure in a one-legged standing configuration (STANCE) and one by replicating the position of the femur in a fall onto the greater trochanter (SIDE). Subject-specific 2D DXA-based linear FE models and 3D QCT-based nonlinear FE models were generated for each specimen and used to predict the measured femoral strength. The outcomes of the models were compared to standard DXA-based areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements. For the STANCE configuration the DXA-based FE models (R(2)=0.74, SEE=1473N) outperformed the best densitometric predictor (Neck_aBMD, R(2)=0.66, SEE=1687N) but not the QCT-based FE models (R(2)=0.80, SEE=1314N). For the SIDE configuration both QCT-based FE models (R(2)=0.85, SEE=455N) and DXA neck aBMD (R(2)=0.80, SEE=502N) outperformed DXA-based FE models (R(2)=0.77, SEE=529N). In both configurations the DXA-based FE model provided a good 1:1 agreement with the experimental data (CC=0.87 for SIDE and CC=0.86 for STANCE), with proper optimization of the failure criteria. In conclusion we found that the DXA-based FE models are a good predictor of femoral strength as compared with experimental data ex vivo. However, it remains to be investigated whether this novel approach can provide good predictions of the risk of fracture in vivo.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone strength; DXA; Femur; Finite element; Validation; aBMD

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27341287     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  12 in total

1.  Optimizing Accuracy of Proximal Femur Elastic Modulus Equations.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; Hugo Giambini; Samad Javid; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Timothy Rossman; Kent D Carlson; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent.

Authors:  Daniella M Patton; Erin M R Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  L Yang; N Parimi; E S Orwoll; D M Black; J T Schousboe; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.

Authors:  Lorenzo Grassi; Sami P Väänänen; Matti Ristinmaa; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hanna Isaksson
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 10.  Current Applications and Selected Technical Details of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Piotr Sawicki; Marek Tałałaj; Katarzyna Życińska; Wojciech S Zgliczyński; Waldemar Wierzba
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.