Literature DB >> 27332738

Intraoperative Supine Breast MR Imaging to Quantify Tumor Deformation and Detection of Residual Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results.

Eva C Gombos1, Jagadeesan Jayender1, Danielle M Richman1, Diana L Caragacianu1, Melissa A Mallory1, Ferenc A Jolesz1, Mehra Golshan1.   

Abstract

Purpose To use intraoperative supine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to quantify breast tumor deformation and displacement secondary to the change in patient positioning from imaging (prone) to surgery (supine) and to evaluate residual tumor immediately after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Materials and Methods Fifteen women gave informed written consent to participate in this prospective HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study between April 2012 and November 2014. Twelve patients underwent lumpectomy and postsurgical intraoperative supine MR imaging. Six of 12 patients underwent both pre- and postsurgical supine MR imaging. Geometric, structural, and heterogeneity metrics of the cancer and distances of the tumor from the nipple, chest wall, and skin were computed. Mean and standard deviations of the changes in volume, surface area, compactness, spherical disproportion, sphericity, and distances from key landmarks were computed from tumor models. Imaging duration was recorded. Results The mean differences in tumor deformation metrics between prone and supine imaging were as follows: volume, 23.8% (range, -30% to 103.95%); surface area, 6.5% (range, -13.24% to 63%); compactness, 16.2% (range, -23% to 47.3%); sphericity, 6.8% (range, -9.10% to 20.78%); and decrease in spherical disproportion, -11.3% (range, -60.81% to 76.95%). All tumors were closer to the chest wall on supine images than on prone images. No evidence of residual tumor was seen on MR images obtained after the procedures. Mean duration of pre- and postoperative supine MR imaging was 25 minutes (range, 18.4-31.6 minutes) and 19 minutes (range, 15.1-22.9 minutes), respectively. Conclusion Intraoperative supine breast MR imaging, when performed in conjunction with standard prone breast MR imaging, enables quantification of breast tumor deformation and displacement secondary to changes in patient positioning from standard imaging (prone) to surgery (supine) and may help clinicians evaluate for residual tumor immediately after BCS. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27332738      PMCID: PMC5118055          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  28 in total

1.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Should we dispense with preoperative breast MRI?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Robin Turner; Petra Macaskill; Lindsay W Turnbull; David R McCready; Todd M Tuttle; Neha Vapiwala; Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lidia Rosi Medeiros; Célia Scapin Duarte; Daniela Dornelles Rosa; Maria Isabel Edelweiss; Marcia Edelweiss; Fábio Rosa Silva; Erik Paul Winnnikow; Patrícia Duarte Simões Pires; Maria Inês Rosa
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Paul Ian Tartter; Ira Bleiweiss; James H Godbold; Alison Estabrook; Sharon Rosenbaum Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.

Authors:  E Ramsay Camp; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Jeffrey S Gilroy; Christopher G Morris; D Scott Lind; Nancy P Mendenhall; Edward M Copeland
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation.

Authors:  M C Smitt; K W Nowels; M J Zdeblick; S Jeffrey; R W Carlson; F E Stockdale; D R Goffinet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Angela Cambic; Nora M Hansen; Kevin P Bethke
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-05

9.  Feasibility of MR imaging-guided breast lumpectomy for malignant tumors in a 0.5-T open-configuration MR imaging system.

Authors:  Masanori Hirose; Daniel F Kacher; Darrell N Smith; Carolyn M Kaelin; Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer F Waljee; Emily S Hu; Lisa A Newman; Amy K Alderman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  12 in total

1.  Local and whole-body staging in patients with primary breast cancer: a comparison of one-step to two-step staging utilizing 18F-FDG-PET/MRI.

Authors:  Julian Kirchner; Johannes Grueneisen; Ole Martin; Mark Oehmigen; Harald H Quick; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Marc Ingenwerth; Onofrio Antonio Catalano; Philipp Heusch; Christian Buchbender; Michael Forsting; Gerald Antoch; Ken Herrmann; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Feasibility of mapping breast cancer with supine breast MRI in patients scheduled for oncoplastic surgery.

Authors:  S Joukainen; A Masarwah; M Könönen; M Husso; A Sutela; V Kärjä; R Vanninen; M Sudah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon S Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Breast image registration for surgery: Insights on material mechanics modeling.

Authors:  Morgan J Ringel; Winona L Richey; Jon Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Tumor deformation correction for an image guidance system in breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon Heiselman; Morgan Ringel; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2022-04-04

6.  Textual fiducial detection in breast conserving surgery for a near-real time image guidance system.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

7.  Quantifying Tumor and Vasculature Deformations during Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Xiaotian Wu; David A Pastel; Rihan Khan; Clifford J Eskey; Yuan Shi; Michael Sramek; Joseph A Paydarfar; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose specimen-positron emission mammography delineates tumour extension in breast-conserving surgery: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Gou Watanabe; M Itoh; X Duan; H Watabe; N Mori; H Tada; A Suzuki; M Miyashita; N Ohuchi; T Ishida
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  ConoSurf: Open-source 3D scanning system based on a conoscopic holography device for acquiring surgical surfaces.

Authors:  Mikael Brudfors; Verónica García-Vázquez; Begoña Sesé-Lucio; Eugenio Marinetto; Manuel Desco; Javier Pascau
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.547

10.  Breast MRI increases the number of mastectomies for ductal cancers, but decreases them for lobular cancers.

Authors:  Marc B I Lobbes; Ingeborg J H Vriens; Annelotte C M van Bommel; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Marjolein L Smidt; Liesbeth J Boersma; Thijs van Dalen; Carolien Smorenburg; Henk Struikmans; Sabine Siesling; Adri C Voogd; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.