Literature DB >> 35607388

Breast image registration for surgery: Insights on material mechanics modeling.

Morgan J Ringel1,2, Winona L Richey1,2, Jon Heiselman1,2, Ma Luo1,2, Ingrid M Meszoely3, Michael I Miga1,4,2,5,6.   

Abstract

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a common procedure for early-stage breast cancer patients. Supine preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) breast imaging for visualizing tumor location and extent, while not standard for procedural guidance, more closely represents the surgical presentation compared to conventional diagnostic pendant positioning. Optimal utilization for surgical guidance, however, requires a fast and accurate image-to-physical registration from preoperative imaging to intraoperative surgical presentation. In this study, three registration methods were investigated on healthy volunteers' breasts (n=11) with the arm-down position simulating preoperative imaging and arm-up position simulating intraoperative data. The registration methods included: (1) point-based rigid registration using synthetic fiducials, (2) non-rigid biomechanical model-based registration using sparse data, and (3) a data-dense 3D diffeomorphic image-based registration from the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) repository. The average target registration errors (TRE) were 10.4 ± 2.3, 6.4 ± 1.5, and 2.8 ± 1.3 mm (mean ± standard deviation) and the average fiducial registration errors (FRE) were 7.8 ± 1.7, 2.5 ± 1.1, and 3.1 ± 1.1 mm (mean ± standard deviation) for the point-based rigid, nonrigid biomechanical, and ANTs registrations, respectively. Additionally, common mechanics-based deformation metrics (volume change and anisotropy) were calculated from the ANTs deformation field. The average metrics revealed anisotropic tissue behavior and a statistical difference in volume change between glandular and adipose tissue, suggesting that nonrigid modeling methods may be improved by incorporating material heterogeneity and anisotropy. Overall, registration accuracy significantly improved with increasingly flexible registration methods, which may inform future development of image guidance systems for lumpectomy procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; deformable image registration; finite element modeling; lumpectomy; registration; surgical guidance

Year:  2022        PMID: 35607388      PMCID: PMC9124453          DOI: 10.1117/12.2611787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  14 in total

1.  Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rikiya Nakamura; Takeshi Nagashima; Masahiro Sakakibara; Takafumi Sangai; Hiroshi Fujimoto; Manabu Arai; Takashi Shida; Katsuhiko Kaneoya; Takuya Ueda; Yukio Nakatani; Hideyuki Hashimoto; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Comparison of different material models to simulate 3-d breast deformations using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Stefan Raith; Jalil Jalali; Alexander Volf; Markus Settles; Hans-Günther Machens; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets.

Authors:  K S Arun; T S Huang; S D Blostein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Using surface markers for MRI guided breast conserving surgery: a feasibility survey.

Authors:  Mehran Ebrahimi; Peter Siegler; Amen Modhafar; Claire M B Holloway; Donald B Plewes; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Breast Biomechanics: What Do We Really Know?

Authors:  Deirdre E McGhee; Julie R Steele
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-03-01

6.  Feasibility of Intraoperative Breast MRI and the Role of Prone Versus Supine Positioning in Surgical Planning for Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Melissa A Mallory; Yasuaki Sagara; Fatih Aydogan; Stephen DeSantis; Jagadeesan Jayender; Diana Caragacianu; Eva Gombos; Kirby G Vosburgh; Ferenc A Jolesz; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI.

Authors:  Rebekah H Conley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Jared A Weis; Thomas S Pheiffer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon S Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  Intraoperative Correction of Liver Deformation Using Sparse Surface and Vascular Features via Linearized Iterative Boundary Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jon S Heiselman; William R Jarnagin; Michael I Miga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Explicit B-spline regularization in diffeomorphic image registration.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.