BACKGROUND: Microscopically clear lumpectomy margins are critical for optimizing local control with breast conservation for cancer. Re-excisions are often necessary to achieve clear surgical margins. Factors that contribute to nonnegative margins and necessitate re-excision may increase the risk of local recurrence. METHODS: Patients who were treated with breast conservation for breast cancers were identified from a prospective database maintained by one of the authors. Factors associated with local recurrence were evaluated in 459 consecutive patients with attention to the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (5%) developed local recurrences at a mean follow-up of 78 months. In multivariate analysis, local recurrence was most significantly associated with the omission of radiotherapy (19% vs. 5%; relative risk [RR], 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-8.2), followed by young age (52 vs. 58; 95% confidence interval, -.83 to -10.6 years) and the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins (none, 4%; one, 7% [RR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, .86-4.89]; two or more, 17% [RR, 5.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-18.8]). Tumor size, the number of involved nodes, pathology, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly related to local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of local recurrence after breast conservation for breast cancer increases progressively with the number of re-excisions needed to achieve clear margins. Patients in whom the cancer is fully excised with clear margins in the first excision will have less of a chance of local recurrence compared with patients who need further re-excision to achieve clear margins.
BACKGROUND: Microscopically clear lumpectomy margins are critical for optimizing local control with breast conservation for cancer. Re-excisions are often necessary to achieve clear surgical margins. Factors that contribute to nonnegative margins and necessitate re-excision may increase the risk of local recurrence. METHODS:Patients who were treated with breast conservation for breast cancers were identified from a prospective database maintained by one of the authors. Factors associated with local recurrence were evaluated in 459 consecutive patients with attention to the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (5%) developed local recurrences at a mean follow-up of 78 months. In multivariate analysis, local recurrence was most significantly associated with the omission of radiotherapy (19% vs. 5%; relative risk [RR], 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-8.2), followed by young age (52 vs. 58; 95% confidence interval, -.83 to -10.6 years) and the number of re-excisions required to obtain clear margins (none, 4%; one, 7% [RR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, .86-4.89]; two or more, 17% [RR, 5.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-18.8]). Tumor size, the number of involved nodes, pathology, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly related to local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of local recurrence after breast conservation for breast cancer increases progressively with the number of re-excisions needed to achieve clear margins. Patients in whom the cancer is fully excised with clear margins in the first excision will have less of a chance of local recurrence compared with patients who need further re-excision to achieve clear margins.
Authors: Fredrick A South; Eric J Chaney; Marina Marjanovic; Steven G Adie; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Brian Madajewski; Brendan F Judy; Anas Mouchli; Veena Kapoor; David Holt; May D Wang; Shuming Nie; Sunil Singhal Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gou Watanabe; M Itoh; X Duan; H Watabe; N Mori; H Tada; A Suzuki; M Miyashita; N Ohuchi; T Ishida Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315