Literature DB >> 35615574

Textual fiducial detection in breast conserving surgery for a near-real time image guidance system.

Winona L Richey1, Jon Heiselman1, Ma Luo1, Ingrid M Meszoely2, Michael I Miga1,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in American women, and is the second most deadly. Current guidance approaches for breast cancer surgery provide distance to a seed implanted near the tumor centroid. Large deformations between preoperative imaging and surgical presentation, coupled with the lack of tumor extent information leads to difficulty in ensuring complete tumor resection. Here we propose a novel image guidance platform that utilizes character-based fiducials for easy detection and small fiducial points for precise and accurate localization. Our system is work-flow friendly, and near-real time with use of stereo cameras for surface acquisition. Using simple image processing techniques, the proposed technique can localize fiducials and character labels, providing updates without relying on video history. Character based fiducial labels can be recognized and used to determine correspondence between left and right images in a pair of stereo cameras, and frame to frame in a sequence of images during a procedure. Letters can be recognized with 89% accuracy using the MATLAB built in optical character recognition function, and an average of 81% of points can be accurately labeled and localized. The stereo camera system can determine surface points with accuracy below 2mm when compared to optically tracked stylus points. These surface points are incorporated to a four-panel guidance display that includes preoperative supine MR, tracked ultrasound, and a model view of the breast and tumor with respect to optically tracked instrumentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast conserving surgery; computer vision; image guided surgery; lumpectomy; optical character recognition; registration; surgical guidance

Year:  2020        PMID: 35615574      PMCID: PMC9128753          DOI: 10.1117/12.2550662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  27 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  A system for automatic monitoring of surgical instruments and dynamic, non-rigid surface deformations in breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Ma Luo; Sarah E Goodale; Logan W Clements; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03-13

3.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Supine breast MRI and 3D optical scanning: a novel approach to improve tumor localization for breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Matthew J Pallone; Steven P Poplack; Hima Bindu R Avutu; Keith D Paulsen; Richard J Barth
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Is mastectomy undertreatment for low-risk breast cancers eligible for breast-conserving therapy?

Authors:  Sanjay P Bagaria; Nabil Wasif; Bhupendra Rawal; Sarah A McLaughlin; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Contrast enhanced breast MRI: spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results.

Authors:  Luca Alessandro Carbonaro; Penampai Tannaphai; Rubina Manuela Trimboli; Nicola Verardi; Maria Paola Fedeli; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Survival after lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the effect of age and hormone receptor status.

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Barbara Fowble; Christina A Clarke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines.

Authors:  Alicia A Heelan Gladden; Sharon Sams; Ana Gleisner; Christina Finlayson; Nicole Kounalakis; Patrick Hosokawa; Regina Brown; Tae Chong; David Mathes; Colleen Murphy
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data.

Authors:  Marina T van Leeuwen; Michael O Falster; Claire M Vajdic; Philip J Crowe; Sanja Lujic; Elizabeth Klaes; Louisa Jorm; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of deformation on a supine-positioned image-guided breast surgery approach.

Authors:  Winona L Richey; Jon S Heiselman; Ma Luo; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.421

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.