Megan H Wright1, Daniel Paape2, Helen P Price2, Deborah F Smith2, Edward W Tate1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London , London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. 2. Centre for Immunology and Infection, Department of Biology, University of York , York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Abstract
The enzyme N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) catalyzes the essential fatty acylation of substrate proteins with myristic acid in eukaryotes and is a validated drug target in the parasite Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). N-Myristoylation typically mediates membrane localization of proteins and is essential to the function of many. However, only a handful of proteins are experimentally validated as N-myristoylated in T. brucei. Here, we perform metabolic labeling with an alkyne-tagged myristic acid analogue, enabling the capture of lipidated proteins in insect and host life stages of T. brucei. We further compare this with a longer chain palmitate analogue to explore the chain length-specific incorporation of fatty acids into proteins. Finally, we combine the alkynyl-myristate analogue with NMT inhibitors and quantitative chemical proteomics to globally define N-myristoylated proteins in the clinically relevant bloodstream form parasites. This analysis reveals five ARF family small GTPases, calpain-like proteins, phosphatases, and many uncharacterized proteins as substrates of NMT in the parasite, providing a global view of the scope of this important protein modification and further evidence for the crucial and pleiotropic role of NMT in the cell.
The enzyme N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) catalyzes the essential fatty acylation of substrate proteins with myristic acid in eukaryotes and is a validated drug target in the parasite Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). N-Myristoylation typically mediates membrane localization of proteins and is essential to the function of many. However, only a handful of proteins are experimentally validated as N-myristoylated in T. brucei. Here, we perform metabolic labeling with an alkyne-tagged myristic acid analogue, enabling the capture of lipidated proteins in insect and host life stages of T. brucei. We further compare this with a longer chain palmitate analogue to explore the chain length-specific incorporation of fatty acids into proteins. Finally, we combine the alkynyl-myristate analogue with NMT inhibitors and quantitative chemical proteomics to globally define N-myristoylated proteins in the clinically relevant bloodstream form parasites. This analysis reveals five ARF family small GTPases, calpain-like proteins, phosphatases, and many uncharacterized proteins as substrates of NMT in the parasite, providing a global view of the scope of this important protein modification and further evidence for the crucial and pleiotropic role of NMT in the cell.
Entities:
Keywords:
N-myristoylation; chemical proteomics; click chemistry; human African trypanosomiasis; protein lipidation; target validation
Human African
trypanosomiasis (HAT), or African sleeping sickness, is a usually
fatal tropical disease caused by unicellular eukaryotic parasites
of the species Trypanosoma brucei and
transmitted by an insect vector. Although the number of reported cases
has dropped in recent years,[1] an estimated
21 million people are at high to moderate risk of the disease.[2] In addition, the analogous livestock disease,
Nagana, causes an estimated 3 million cattle deaths per year with
significant economic impact.[3]T.
brucei gambiense, responsible for >98% of HAT cases, causes
a chronic infection in which the early stage, lasting several months
or years, is relatively asymptomatic; later in infection, parasites
cross the blood–brain barrier and invade the central nervous
system, ultimately leading to coma and death. There are few treatments
currently available to treat late-stage HAT, and all suffer from high
toxicity, high expense, or problematic delivery.[4]T. brucei is transmitted
primarily by the bite of an infected tsetse fly, which injects the
metacyclic trypomastigote form of the parasite into the mammalian
host, although mother to fetus transmission can also occur. The parasite
then transforms into the bloodstream form (BSF), which remains extracellular
in the bloodstream and lymph. When a tsetse fly takes a blood meal
from an infected host, parasites are taken up and transform into procyclic
forms (PCFs) that multiply in the insect gut prior to transformation
into epimastigotes, which travel to the insect salivary gland.[5] The BSF is therefore of most interest for treatment
of infection and progression of the disease, whereas the PCF is important
for replication in the insect vector. The adaptive differences between
BSF and PCF, and the process of differentiation, are important for
druggability of BSF trypanosomes in the mammalian host.The
enzyme myristoyl-CoA:protein N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) is an essential
eukaryotic enzyme that catalyzes attachment of the C14:0 fatty acid
myristate from myristoyl-CoA to the N-terminal glycine residue of
a subset of cellular proteins.[6] N-Myristoylation
mediates membrane localization, modulates stability, or regulates
protein–protein interactions, and NMT has been investigated
as a potential drug target in HAT,[7] fungal
infections,[8] leishmaniases,[9] malaria,[10] nematodes,[11] and cancer.[12] Structure-based
design and high-throughput screening have yielded multiple NMT inhibitor
series, some with species selectivity.[7,13] In T. brucei, RNAi knockdown of NMT results in abnormal
morphology and defects in endocytic trafficking.[14] Trafficking defects may in part be related to loss of myristoylation
of members of the ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) family of small GTPases
involved in vesicular trafficking in eukaryotes. RNAi depletion of
two N-myristoylated T. brucei ARFs
showed that the proteins are essential for viability of BSF parasites
and revealed defects in subcellular structures such as the flagellar
pocket (the site of almost all endo- and exocytosis), vesicles, and
the Golgi apparatus.[15] In 2010, Frearson
et al. reported a series of NMT inhibitors with high potency against
the T. brucei enzyme, with the ability
to cure trypanosomiasis in mice.[7,13a,13b] The phenotype of inhibitor treatment was distinct from RNAi knockdown
of NMT, but the parasite did exhibit an enlarged flagellar pocket.[7] Given the cotranslational nature of N-myristoylation,
NMT inhibitors would be expected to affect viability of both BSF and
PCF parasites, because both forms replicate; in terms of clinical
treatment, however, targeting BSF parasites is of most interest.Bioinformatic analyses suggest that more than 60 proteins may be
N-myristoylated in T. brucei, resulting
in the prediction that NMT inhibition will have pleiotropic effects
on the parasite.[16] There is some experimental
evidence for N-myristoylation of a few parasite proteins: three ARFs,[15a,15b,17] cytoskeleton-associated protein
CAP5.5,[18] Calflagin,[19] phosphatase PPEF,[16] flagellar-calcium
binding protein FCaBP (in the related parasite T. cruzi),[20] and virulence-associated metacaspase
4 (MCA4).[21] However, global characterization
of N-myristoylation by standard biochemical methods such as radiolabeling
is hampered by low sensitivity, the need for specific antibodies for
target proteins, and the frequent requirement for artificial overexpression
to achieve detection. We and others have recently made use of the
metabolic incorporation of bioorthogonally tagged fatty acids to globally
profile myristoylation and other protein lipidations in diverse organisms,[22] including the trypanosomatid parasite Leishmania donovani, which causes leishmaniasis.[23] Here we apply this technology to study lipidation
in T. brucei, comparing acylated proteins
in the insect (PCF) and host (BSF) life stages using a tagged analogue
of myristate and analyzing acylation patterns with a tagged palmitate
analogue. Finally, we quantify changes in acylation levels in the
presence of NMT inhibitors and demonstrate selective target engagement
across the proteome through quantitative chemical proteomic analyses.
Taken together, these data globally define NMT substrates in the key
life stages of the parasite and provide insight into the mechanism
of action of NMT inhibitors in T. brucei.
Results and Discussion
Fatty acids bearing terminal alkyne
or azide modifications are known to be tolerated by the cellular machinery
in diverse systems and incorporated into acylated proteins.[22a] Our approach uses myristic acid analogue YnMyr
(Figure a), the coenzyme-A
analogue of which is accepted as a substrate by NMTs and which we
have previously shown is incorporated into N-myristoylated proteins
in Plasmodium falciparum,[10]Leishmania donovani,[23] human cancer cells,[12] virus-infected cells,[24] and
zebrafish embryos.[25] After cell lysis,
alkyne-tagged proteins are captured by a click reaction, the copper-catalyzed
cycloaddition of an alkyne and azide (CuAAC), appending a variety
of groups such as a fluorophore for visualization and/or biotin for
affinity pull-down.[26] Enriched proteins
are then subject to tryptic digest and shotgun LC-MS/MS analysis for
proteomic identification (Figure a).
Figure 1
YnMyr labels proteins in T. brucei PCF parasites. (a) Overview of tagging strategy. YnMyr or myristic
acid (Myr) was added to T. brucei parasite
cultures and incorporated metabolically into lipidated proteins. The
alkyne tag was reacted by CuAAC with fluorophore and/or biotin-functionalized
azide capture reagents (Supporting Information Figure S1) to allow downstream enrichment and analysis by proteomics
and SDS-PAGE. (b) Labeling with YnMyr or Myr (−) in PCF parasites.
After 18 h of incubation with probes at 100 μM, parasites were
lysed, and proteins were reacted with AzTB and separated by gel for
fluorescence scanning. Samples were treated with NaOH or precipitated
with chloroform/methanol (C/M) as indicated. (c) Specific PCF labeling
is resistant to treatment with Pronase. Coomassie gels are shown in Supporting Information Figure S2.
YnMyr labels proteins in T. brucei PCF parasites. (a) Overview of tagging strategy. YnMyr or myristic
acid (Myr) was added to T. brucei parasite
cultures and incorporated metabolically into lipidated proteins. The
alkyne tag was reacted by CuAAC with fluorophore and/or biotin-functionalized
azide capture reagents (Supporting Information Figure S1) to allow downstream enrichment and analysis by proteomics
and SDS-PAGE. (b) Labeling with YnMyr or Myr (−) in PCF parasites.
After 18 h of incubation with probes at 100 μM, parasites were
lysed, and proteins were reacted with AzTB and separated by gel for
fluorescence scanning. Samples were treated with NaOH or precipitated
with chloroform/methanol (C/M) as indicated. (c) Specific PCF labeling
is resistant to treatment with Pronase. Coomassie gels are shown in Supporting Information Figure S2.
YnMyr Labels Proteins in T. brucei
To investigate whether YnMyr can be used to label proteins
in T. brucei, cultures of PCF parasites
were incubated for 18 h with 100 μM YnMyr or myristic acid (Myr)
control. Following cell lysis, tagged proteins were ligated to biotin
and TAMRA functionalized reagent AzTB (Supporting
Information Figure S1) via CuAAC and visualized by in-gel fluorescence
following separation by SDS-PAGE. In addition to multiple discrete
bands, two diffuse bands were observed between 20 and 40 kDa (Figure b), which could be
removed by chloroform–methanol precipitation or base treatment
of proteins after CuAAC. Trypanosomatid parasites are abundant in
complex glycolipids, and PCF T. brucei possesses a family of surface proteins, the procyclins, which bear
a glycan-elaborated glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor near
their C-terminus and in some cases N-glycosylation in the N-terminal
domain.[27] When separated by SDS-PAGE, procyclins
migrate as two polydisperse bands at ∼30 and 40 kDa and can
be radiolabeled with [3H]-myristate.[28] Treatment of YnMyr-labeled PCF samples with Pronase shifted
a proportion of the diffuse bands to lower molecular weight and completely
removed the majority of labeling (Figure c), consistent with the discrete bands corresponding
to proteins and the diffuse bands corresponding to the partially protease-resistant
procyclins. Alternatively, the diffuse bands may correspond to other
glycolipid components, such as free poly-N-glycosylated GPIs that
are also present on the surface of T. brucei PCF.[28a]Having established that
YnMyr could label proteins in the procyclic insect stage form of T. brucei, we focused on host stage parasites. Cultured
BSF cells were incubated with 100 μM YnMyr or Myr for 4, 8,
or 18 h and lysates processed as described above. Labeling intensity
increased from 4 to 8 h but decreased again at 18 h, at which time
point YnMyr-related toxicity was also observed (Figure a,b; Supporting Information Figure S3); parasites exhibited the so-called “Big Eye”
phenotype, which is characterized by an enlarged flagellar pocket.
This phenotype is the result of a block in receptor-mediated endocytosis
and has previously been described following RNAi knockdown of clathrin
heavy chain[29] and the small GTPase ARF1.[15b] Consistent with our results, YnMyr was previously
shown to be moderately toxic to T. brucei in a study seeking to identify inhibitors of variant surface glycoprotein
(VSG) GPI myristoylation.[30] The VSG coats
the surface of BSF T. brucei and is
unusual in incorporating specifically diacyl-myristate into its GPI
anchor.[31] This feature is unique to T. brucei BSF, and multiple cellular pathways have
evolved to ensure that myristate alone is incorporated. We hypothesize
that the observed YnMyr toxicity is related to disruption of the VSG
myristate pathway, and an 8 h tagging step was therefore used in subsequent
experiments to circumvent YnMyr-related toxicity and focus analysis
on N-myristoylated proteins.
Figure 2
YnMyr labels proteins in T. brucei BSF parasites. (a) Time-dependent metabolic incorporation of 100
μM YnMyr or Myr (−) in BSF parasites. (b) Phenotype of
YnMyr treatment at 18 h in BSF. Scale bar = 10 μm. See also Supporting Information Figure S3. (b) NaOH treatment
of lysates from BSF parasites incubated with YnMyr reveal labeling
of a base sensitive band at ∼60 kDa. (d) Chemical structures
of myristate analogues YnMyr and AzMyr and palmitate analogue YnPal.
(e) Comparative labeling with different fatty acid analogues at 100
μM in BSF. Coomassie gels are shown in Supporting Information Figure S2. Additional data are shown in Supporting Information Figure S4.
YnMyr labels proteins in T. brucei BSF parasites. (a) Time-dependent metabolic incorporation of 100
μM YnMyr or Myr (−) in BSF parasites. (b) Phenotype of
YnMyr treatment at 18 h in BSF. Scale bar = 10 μm. See also Supporting Information Figure S3. (b) NaOH treatment
of lysates from BSF parasites incubated with YnMyr reveal labeling
of a base sensitive band at ∼60 kDa. (d) Chemical structures
of myristate analogues YnMyr and AzMyr and palmitate analogue YnPal.
(e) Comparative labeling with different fatty acid analogues at 100
μM in BSF. Coomassie gels are shown in Supporting Information Figure S2. Additional data are shown in Supporting Information Figure S4.A prominent band between 50 and 75 kDa showed sensitivity
to treatment with strong base (NaOH; Figure c; Supporting Information Figure S4), indicating ester-linked YnMyr and consistent with incorporation
of the probe into the GPI anchor of the VSG, as expected. We have
previously observed significant incorporation of tagged fatty acids
into GPI-anchored proteins in the malaria parasite P. falciparum.[10] The
majority of other bands were insensitive to base treatment, implying
amide-linked YnMyr. Azido-myristate mimetic AzMyr gave very similar
labeling to YnMyr, as expected, whereas longer chain palmitate analogue
YnPal gave a distinct pattern (Figure d,e). These data are consistent with incorporation
of tagged fatty acids into proteins by chain-length specific acyltransferases
such as NMT and palmitoylacyltransferases (PATs).
Proteomic Identification
of YnMyr-Labeled Proteins in T. brucei
We have previously shown that YnMyr is incorporated into
putative N-myristoylated protein ARL6 via labeling of this protein
after immunoprecipitation (IP).[17] However,
the IP method relies on the availability of an antibody to the protein
of interest and has very low throughput. To carry out global identification
of the proteins labeled in BSF and PCF parasites, tagged proteins
were ligated to AzTB and enriched by pull-down onto NeutrAvidin-coated
resin through the biotin affinity label (Supporting Information Figure S5). Bead-bound proteins were subject to
tryptic digest and peptides analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Each sample set
consisted of a YnMyr sample and Myr control, prepared in parallel.
Raw data were searched using MaxQuant[32] and a database of the T. brucei TREU
927 reference strain (TriTrypDB[33]). In-gel
fluorescence analysis suggested that the VSG was also labeled with
YnMyr. Since the VSG variant is strain-specific, initial BSF experimental
data were therefore also searched against the T. brucei Lister strain 427, identifying VSG variant Tb427.BES40.22; this
protein sequence was appended to the TREU 927 FASTA file for all subsequent
searches. Data were analyzed using label-free quantification (LFQ),
a technique that normalizes intensity measurements to enable comparison
between different LC-MS/MS runs, in MaxQuant (“MaxLFQ”).[34] After Log2 transformation of intensities,
data were filtered to retain only proteins present in several replicates,
missing values were imputed from a normal distribution to mimic values
at the limit of detection, and permutation-corrected two-sample t tests were used to assess proteins significantly enriched
in YnMyr samples over Myr controls (see Methods). A caveat to this analytical workflow is that proteins detected
in multiple YnMyr samples but with low intensity will be assigned
as nonsignificant even if they are absent from Myr controls because
their intensity is too close to background; many of these proteins
could be genuine hits but of low abundance.In BSF experiments,
proteins were filtered to retain only those present in at least three
of four replicates and in biological duplicate, resulting in 101 significantly
enriched proteins in YnMyr samples (Figure a; Supporting Information Table S1). Of these, 46 (46%) are likely to carry an N-terminal
glycine implied by an MG motif at the N-terminus, which is thought
to be a requirement for NMT-dependent myristoylation.[35] In PCF experiments, proteins were filtered to retain only
those present in at least four of the six technical replicates and
in biological duplicate, identifying 91 proteins as significantly
enriched in YnMyr samples (Figure b; Supporting Information Table S2); again, roughly half of these proteins have an N-terminal
MG motif.
Figure 3
Identification of YnMyr-tagged proteins in (a) BSF and (b) PCF T. brucei. Volcano plots show significance of enrichment
over background. Parasites were treated with Myr or YnMyr, lysates
labeled by CuAAC, and proteins enriched by biotin–streptavidin
interaction and digested by trypsin for LC-MS/MS. Proteins from four
(BSF) or six (PCF) replicates (independent sample processing from
the lysate stage; includes a biological replicate in each case) were
quantified by label-free quantification (MaxLFQ). After filtering
to retain only those proteins present in biological duplicate and
in 3 of 4 (BSF) or 4 of 6 (PCF) samples, missing intensities were
imputed from a normal distribution chosen to mimic noise level, and
a modified t test with permutation-based FDR statistics
was applied (250 permutations) to compare Myr and YnMyr groups. BSF
and PCF: FDR = 0.001; s0 = 1. Proteins containing an N-terminal glycine
(MG) and those for which the YnMyr-modified peptide was identified
using reagents AzRB or AzRTB in the respective lifestage are indicated.
ARF* indicates multiple proteins in this proteinGroup. See also Supporting Information Tables S1–S3.
Identification of YnMyr-tagged proteins in (a) BSF and (b) PCF T. brucei. Volcano plots show significance of enrichment
over background. Parasites were treated with Myr or YnMyr, lysates
labeled by CuAAC, and proteins enriched by biotin–streptavidin
interaction and digested by trypsin for LC-MS/MS. Proteins from four
(BSF) or six (PCF) replicates (independent sample processing from
the lysate stage; includes a biological replicate in each case) were
quantified by label-free quantification (MaxLFQ). After filtering
to retain only those proteins present in biological duplicate and
in 3 of 4 (BSF) or 4 of 6 (PCF) samples, missing intensities were
imputed from a normal distribution chosen to mimic noise level, and
a modified t test with permutation-based FDR statistics
was applied (250 permutations) to compare Myr and YnMyr groups. BSF
and PCF: FDR = 0.001; s0 = 1. Proteins containing an N-terminal glycine
(MG) and those for which the YnMyr-modified peptide was identified
using reagents AzRB or AzRTB in the respective lifestage are indicated.
ARF* indicates multiple proteins in this proteinGroup. See also Supporting Information Tables S1–S3.Non-MG proteins highly enriched
in YnMyr samples include glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase
C (GPI-PLC), a protein that is S-myristoylated,[36] in BSF samples, and MSP-B (a homologue of GPI-anchored Leishmania GP63 surface protease), procyclic form surface
phosphoprotein (PSSA-2), and p-glycoprotein-A in PCF parasites. The
GPI-anchored VSG was also detected in BSF samples and was enriched
in YnMyr experiments compared to controls. Proteins previously shown
to be N-myristoylated in T. brucei or
related species included flagellar calcium binding protein (FCaBP,
shown to be N-myristoylated in T. cruzi),[20] cytoskeleton-associated protein CAP5.5,[18] the proteasome regulatory ATPase subunit 2 (RPT2),
which is known to be N-myristoylated in many eukaryotes,[37] a phosphatase of the PPEF family,[16] and a GRASP homologue (acylated in other protozoan
parasites[38]). Metacaspase 4 (MCA4), previously
shown to be palmitoylated at a cysteine residue proximal to a likely
N-myristoylation site, was also identified, principally in BSF samples;
this pseudopeptidase is an important virulence factor in T. brucei infection.[21] Several ARF/ARLs, a well-studied family of N-myristoylated small
GTPases, were also identified across the data sets: these included
Tb927.7.6230, now called ARF3 (GeneDB) but previously known as ARL1,
and shown to be both N-myristoylated and essential to survival of
BSF T. brucei.[15a,15c] ARL6 (Tb927.8.5060), which we showed previously to be tagged with
YnMyr in T. brucei using IP with an
ARL6 specific antibody,[17] was a significant
hit identified in both BSF and PCF parasites.In initial analyses
using AzTB as capture reagent, no YnMyr-modified peptides were identified;
this is unsurprising because the biotinylated peptide should remain
partly anchored to the resin and the large TAMRA-containing label
hinders detection by LC-MS/MS. We recently reported a series of related
reagents incorporating a trypsin cleavage site between the TAMRA/biotin
moieties and the azide capture group;[25] these reagents enabled identification of YnMyr-tagged peptides in
the malaria parasite P. falciparum,[10] human cancer cells,[12] zebrafish,[25] and Leishmania parasites.[23] In the current study we
used AzRTB and AzRB (Supporting Information Figure S1), which both incorporate an arginine trypsin cleavage
site and biotin, with AzRTB also featuring a TAMRA fluorophore. Searches
were carried out with the additional mass fragment as a variable modification
on any amino acid at a peptide N-terminus and data filtered to retain
only those identifications meeting a stringent score threshold, as
established in our previous studies[25] (see Methods). Sixty-five identified modification sites
across BSF and PCF samples were matched to 56 discrete proteins; peptides
differently modified by methionine oxidation or with different lengths
due to missed cleavages can derive from the same protein sequence
(Supporting Information Table S3; see Supporting Information Figure S6 for examples
of assigned modified peptide spectra and Supporting Information Data File for all spectra). Of these 65 peptides,
only 3 lacked an N-terminal glycine and corresponded to proteins for
which no other peptides were identified; therefore, these are likely
to be false-positive identifications. When AzRTB was used to capture
and enrich tagged proteins, 18 YnMyr-modified peptides (17 proteins)
were detected in T. brucei PCF samples.
AzRB, however, resulted in more identifications, with 30 modified
N-terminal glycines detected in PCF and 26 in BSF samples. Sixteen
YnMyr modified N-terminal glycines were detected independently with
both AzRTB and AzRB; these reagents result in remnants on the modified
peptide that are slightly different in mass (by one methylene unit),
providing orthogonal evidence for modification of these peptides.BSF and PCF parasites are adapted to very different environments,
and the identification of stage-specific proteins expressed specifically
in the insect vector or the host is an ongoing area of research.[39] Comparison of YnMyr LFQ intensities of hits
(defined as proteins identified as significantly enriched over Myr
controls in one or both life stages) by t test revealed
that a subset of non-MG and MG proteins were differentially detected
in one life stage over the other (Figure ; Supporting Information Table S4). The data are in good agreement with existing studies.
The ratio of BSF/PCF YnMyr intensities for hits was plotted against
the ratio from a published data set where stable isotope labeling
by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) quantitative proteomics was
used to compare the two life stages:[39] pleasingly,
for the 59 proteins quantified by both studies (roughly half of the
LFQ hits in our comparison), the correlation was high (Pearson 0.87; Figure b). Our data are
also in similarly good agreement with an earlier SILAC-based study
(Urbaniak et al.;[40] Pearson correlation
0.83; Supporting Information Figure S7).
These high correlations also show that, in most cases, YnMyr labeling
tracks protein abundance.
Figure 4
Comparison of acylated proteins in two life
stages of T. brucei. (a) Volcano plot
comparing YnMyr intensities of hits (defined as proteins significantly
enriched over Myr controls in one or both life stages) by a two-sided
two-sample permutation-corrected t test (250 permutations;
FDR 0.01, s0 2). Those proteins identified in one life stage (BSF/PCF
only) and N-terminal glycine-containing proteins (MG) are indicated.
(b) Comparison of relative abundance of protein hits in BSF and PCF
parasites in the current study (LFQ quantification; ratio of YnMyr
intensities is plotted) with the study of Butter et al. (quantification
via SILAC).[39] Comparison with another previously
reported data set is shown in Supporting Information Figure S7. See also Supporting Information Table S4. (c) Heatmap and functional classification of MG proteins
found/enriched in one of the two stages. YnMyr intensities shown and
color-coded within each row. The total data set is shown in Supporting Information Figure S8.
Comparison of acylated proteins in two life
stages of T. brucei. (a) Volcano plot
comparing YnMyr intensities of hits (defined as proteins significantly
enriched over Myr controls in one or both life stages) by a two-sided
two-sample permutation-corrected t test (250 permutations;
FDR 0.01, s0 2). Those proteins identified in one life stage (BSF/PCF
only) and N-terminal glycine-containing proteins (MG) are indicated.
(b) Comparison of relative abundance of protein hits in BSF and PCF
parasites in the current study (LFQ quantification; ratio of YnMyr
intensities is plotted) with the study of Butter et al. (quantification
via SILAC).[39] Comparison with another previously
reported data set is shown in Supporting Information Figure S7. See also Supporting Information Table S4. (c) Heatmap and functional classification of MG proteins
found/enriched in one of the two stages. YnMyr intensities shown and
color-coded within each row. The total data set is shown in Supporting Information Figure S8.As expected, specific cell surface proteins such
as GPI-PLC and VSG were prominent in BSF samples, whereas MSP-B and
PSSA-2 were found in PCF samples, consistent with the large changes
that occur on the parasite’s surface coat. Functional analysis
of stage-enriched MG motif proteins revealed several hits in the calpain
family of cysteine peptidases, two protein phosphatases with different
stage specificities, and proteins involved in intracellular transport:
phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C and receptor adenylate cyclase
(GRESAG4)[41] in PCF parasites and ARL1B
enriched in BSF parasites (Figure c). Calpains are calcium-dependent cysteine peptidases,
and T. brucei possesses an expanded
family of calpain-like proteins, some of which have apparently no
proteolytic activity but are targeted by lipidation or other signals
to different subcellular locations.[42] Although
the functions of these proteins are largely unknown, they have been
hypothesized to play regulatory roles, for example, in cytoskeletal
remodeling in the case of CAP5.5,[18] or
in virulence in the mammalian host in the case of MCA4.[21] Given the widespread differential phosphorylation
of BSF and PCF T. brucei,[43] the identified stage-enriched lipidated phosphatases
could also be particularly interesting for future studies; for example,
a recent analysis of two N-myristoylated phosphatases demonstrated
their importance at specific stages of development in the malaria
parasite.[44] Thirteen MG proteins currently
of unknown function were also enriched in one of the two stages. Interestingly,
12 lipidated proteins significantly enriched in our PCF data set were
found to be up-regulated early in differentiation from BSF to PCF
parasites in a recent proteomic study by Dejung et al.[45] (Supporting Information Figure S7). Other interesting hits are ARF protein ARLB and calpain-like
protein Tb927.1.2230, both enriched in our BSF data and identified
as transiently up-regulated during differentiation by Dejung et al.,
suggestive of roles in the differentiation process. Overall, our data
show that lipidated proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism,
phosphorylation processes, small-molecule, ion, and protein transport,
and signal transduction vary between BSF and PCF parasites (Supporting Information Figure S8), consistent
with the significant changes to cell structure and metabolism that
accompany adaptation of the cell to its different host environments.
Proteomic Identification of YnPal-Labeled Proteins in T. brucei
As discussed above, GPI-anchored
proteins and glycoconjugates are prevalent in T. brucei, and these are known to incorporate fatty acyl chains of various
lengths. In addition, fatty acids can be incorporated into proteins
on cysteine side chains; S-acylation with the 16-carbon fatty acid
palmitate is a common modification across eukaryotes, including protozoan
parasites.[46] In contrast to the high specificity
of NMT for myristoylation,[6] S-acylation
enzymes and pathways have been shown to be promiscuous in accepting
fatty acid analogues with a variety of chain lengths—in mammalian
cells at least.[47] In an additional layer
of complexity, some proteins are dually acylated, being N-myristoylated
at the N-terminal glycine and S-acylated with palmitate on a nearby
cysteine residue.[46] Furthermore, T. brucei is known to metabolize long-chain fatty
acids to meet its needs in different life stages and culture conditions,[48] although whether alkyne-tagged analogues would
also be substrates for these metabolic enzymes is not known.To provide additional insight into whether YnMyr was also incorporated
into S-palmitoylation sites and to establish a broader picture of
lipidation in T. brucei, longer chain
palmitate analogue YnPal (Figure d) was incubated with BSF parasites at 100 μM
for 4, 8, or 18 h, and samples were processed as before. In-gel fluorescence
analysis revealed a distinct band pattern for the two analogues (Figure a). Interestingly,
in contrast to YnMyr, YnPal was not visibly toxic to parasites, and
labeling intensity continued to increase slightly up to 18 h (Supporting Information Figure S4). Similar to
YnMyr, YnPal was also incorporated into a base-sensitive band at ∼60
kDa, although to a much lesser extent (Figure a). YnPal proteins were enriched and analyzed
by LC-MS/MS as described above, and palmitic acid (Pal) controls were
run in parallel. Results were filtered to retain only those in at
least two of the three replicates and data analyzed by LFQ (Supporting Information Figure S9). This YnPal
data set was compared to the YnMyr BSF data set and also cross-compared
with a data set of potential palmitoylated proteins identified by
Emmer et al.[49] in T. brucei PCF using acyl-biotin exchange chemistry (ABE) (Supporting Information Table S5). ABE is an approach complementary
to click chemistry for palmitoyl-protein discovery and identifies
proteins that bear hydroxylamine-labile linkages at cysteine residues.
Protein hits were then categorized in the following way: (1) N-terminal
glycine (MG) motif plus detection in the experiments of Emmer et al.;
(2) detection by Emmer et al. but no MG motif; (3) MG proteins found
in YnMyr data sets only; (4) other MG motif proteins; (5) others (Figure b). YnMyr and YnPal
intensities of hits, defined as proteins significant in one or both
data sets and/or with direct detection of the N-terminal YnMyr modified
peptide, were compared by t test (Figure b). A high degree of overlap
was observed between YnMyr and YnPal data sets: of 134 protein hits,
only 3 were exclusive to YnPal samples and 15 to YnMyr samples. Most
MG hits were identified either in YnMyr alone (15 proteins) or in
both data sets (32 proteins), whereas non-MG hits also identified
by Emmer et al. were mostly enriched in YnPal samples compared to
YnMyr, as expected (Figure b). MG proteins detected as S-acylated by Emmer et al. also
identified in the current study include FCaBP, PPEF, and two calpain-like
proteins with homology to Leishmania small myristoylated
protein 1 (SMP-1), Tb927.1.2230, and Tb927.1.2260; there is published
evidence for the S-acylation of these proteins on cysteines proximal
to the N-terminal myristoylation site.[16,20,50] LFQ analyses also revealed enrichment of known S-palmitoylated
protein MCA4.[21] Interestingly, other members
of this family (MCA3 and MCA1) were also YnPal-enriched hits, suggesting
that these interesting pseudoproteases may be S-acylated. Around 70
proteins lacking an MG motif and identified as YnPal hits here were
not found by Emmer et al., likely due to stage-specific differences
in the proteome (insect stage PCF parasites in Emmer et al. and human
stage BSF cultures in the present study), and may also reflect the
complementarity of ABE and CuAAC-based chemical proteomics for palmitoylated
proteome analysis.
Figure 5
Comparison of myristate and palmitate tagging in T. brucei BSF. (a) BSF parasites were incubated with
YnMyr or YnPal (Figure d) probes for 8 h and tagged proteins visualized by in-gel fluorescence
after CuAAC. The gel was subject to treatment with NaOH and reimaged
to identify base labile bands. (b) Volcano plot comparing YnMyr and
YnPal intensity for protein hits (significantly enriched over Myr
or Pal controls). Two-sided two-sample permutation-corrected t test (250 permutations; FDR 0.05, s0 1). Proteins are
categorized and color coded to indicate if they were identified as
palmitoylated by Emmer et al. (Tb PCF palmitoylome) or contain an
N-terminal glycine (MG). “YnMyr only” indicates protein
not a hit in YnPal analyses. See also Supporting Information Figure S9 and Table S5.
Comparison of myristate and palmitate tagging in T. brucei BSF. (a) BSF parasites were incubated with
YnMyr or YnPal (Figure d) probes for 8 h and tagged proteins visualized by in-gel fluorescence
after CuAAC. The gel was subject to treatment with NaOH and reimaged
to identify base labile bands. (b) Volcano plot comparing YnMyr and
YnPal intensity for protein hits (significantly enriched over Myr
or Pal controls). Two-sided two-sample permutation-corrected t test (250 permutations; FDR 0.05, s0 1). Proteins are
categorized and color coded to indicate if they were identified as
palmitoylated by Emmer et al. (Tb PCF palmitoylome) or contain an
N-terminal glycine (MG). “YnMyr only” indicates protein
not a hit in YnPal analyses. See also Supporting Information Figure S9 and Table S5.Proteins in the ARF/ARL family
are not generally dually acylated, and the large majority were indeed
identified only in YnMyr analyses. An interesting exception is the
ARF protein Tb927.9.13650 (and Tb927.9.13680, differing by just one
amino acid), which was detected in YnPal analyses and contains a cysteine
strongly predicted to be palmitoylated (CSS-Palm; Supporting Information Table S5).[51] Consistent with gel-based results (Figure a), the VSG was also enriched in YnPal samples
(Supporting Information Table S5), albeit
to a lesser extent than with YnMyr. Although previous data indicate
that myristate is specifically incorporated into the final GPI anchor
of this protein, intermediates in the GPI anchor remodeling process
contain longer chain fatty acids, including potentially stearate (C18:0).[31,52] Alternatively, there are other examples of variable lipid labeling
in T. brucei, with evidence for promiscuous
incorporation and metabolism prior to incorporation of lipids. For
example, the S-acylated protein glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific
phospholipase C (GPI-PLC), which is responsible for processing the
GPI anchor of VSG and other substrates, can be radiolabeled with myristate,
palmitate, or stearate;[36] consistent with
this, GPI-PLC was detected with almost equal enrichment in our YnMyr
and YnPal analyses. In addition, labeling with either [3H]-myristate or [3H]-palmitate results in both myristate
and palmitate being present on GPI-PLC, suggesting that trypanosomes
can interconvert these fatty acids. Indeed, at least in some culture
conditions, myristate is readily chain elongated in T. brucei to palmitate and stearate.[53] It is conceivable that YnMyr and YnPal are processed by
chain elongation/reduction by the trypanosome fatty acid biosynthetic
machinery and incorporated into the VSG and other proteins; because
processing occurs at the carboxyl end of the lipid, this would be
expected to conserve the alkyne tag. Further work will be required
to explore this possibility.In summary, approximately 100 YnPal
tagged targets have been identified here, including both S-acylated
and GPI-anchored proteins.
Chemical Knockdown of NMT
NMT has
been validated preclinically as a drug target in T.
brucei BSF via RNAi knockdown and chemical inhibition
of the enzyme, and target engagement of inhibitor with NMT inside
parasites was demonstrated through the reduction of protein radiolabeling
with [3H]-myristic acid following treatment with a T. brucei NMT inhibitor (NMTi).[7] Azido-myristate has also been used to demonstrate that
NMTi reduces tagging in the related organism T. cruzi in a dose-dependent manner at the level of in-gel fluorescence,[54] although tagged proteins were not identified.
Following a strategy similar to our recent studies in human cells[12] and L. donovani,[23] we aimed to use quantitative proteomics
in combination with YnMyr and a TbNMT inhibitor to provide orthogonal
evidence for the identity of NMT substrates while simultaneously defining
those substrates that may mediate the phenotypes observed on inhibition.TbNMT inhibitor 1(7) (Figure a) was co-incubated
with YnMyr in BSF parasites at concentrations ranging from 5 to 100
nM. A dose-dependent drop in labeling of most bands was observed,
with the notable exception of the VSG, consistent with target engagement
in the parasite (Figure b). Inhibitor 1 is reported to have an EC50 of 2 nM on BSF parasites and sub-nanomolar IC50 against
TbNMT and is effective in eliminating parasites in a mouse model of
trypanosomiasis.[7] A small panel of analogues
of 1,[13a,55] with varying potency against
TbNMT (compounds 2–4, Figure a), was analyzed using YnMyr
tagging. In all cases the same trend toward decreased labeling was
observed, with the VSG band remaining largely unaffected by NMT inhibition
(Supporting Information Figure S10). Following
base treatment, quantification of the decrease in fluorescence intensity
suggested intracellular inhibition of N-myristoylation with a TC50 (concentration of compound resulting in a 50% decrease in
tagging) in the low nanomolar range for 1, 3, and 4 and in the low micromolar range for 2, in line with the measured enzyme potencies for these compounds
(Figure a,c). These
data are consistent with the on-target action of these inhibitors
in parasites and provide further evidence that the majority of base
treatment-insensitive YnMyr labeling in T. brucei BSF is NMT-dependent.
Figure 6
TbNMT inhibitors dose-dependently knock down
YnMyr labeling. (a) Structures of previously reported TbNMT inhibitors 1–4, their IC50 values against
TbNMT, and tagging-IC50 (concentration of compound required
for 50% inhibition of tagging, TC50) calculated based on
fluorescent gels. (b) In-gel fluorescence analysis of samples from
parasites treated with indicated concentrations of 1 during
YnMyr tagging. (c) Quantification of in-gel fluorescence signal from
NaOH-treated gels (n = 2–3) of samples from
parasites co-incubated with inhibitors 1–4 and YnMyr. See Supporting Information Figure S10 for example gels.
TbNMT inhibitors dose-dependently knock down
YnMyr labeling. (a) Structures of previously reported TbNMT inhibitors 1–4, their IC50 values against
TbNMT, and tagging-IC50 (concentration of compound required
for 50% inhibition of tagging, TC50) calculated based on
fluorescent gels. (b) In-gel fluorescence analysis of samples from
parasites treated with indicated concentrations of 1 during
YnMyr tagging. (c) Quantification of in-gel fluorescence signal from
NaOH-treated gels (n = 2–3) of samples from
parasites co-incubated with inhibitors 1–4 and YnMyr. See Supporting Information Figure S10 for example gels.To identify proteins for which acylation levels were selectively
affected by NMT inhibition, YnMyr-tagged BSF parasites were treated
with 1 at 5, 10, or 100 nM or with 2 at
1, 5, or 20 μM, concentrations designed to probe the range of
tagging reduction observed in gels for more and less potent examples
of TbNMT inhibitors. The resulting samples (16 total, including replicates)
were subject to CuAAC, base treatment to remove GPI-anchor tagging,
enrichment, and LC-MS/MS analysis; Myr controls were processed in
parallel (Supporting Information Figure
S11). Data were analyzed by MaxLFQ,[34] and
proteins quantified in both no-inhibitor replicates were selected
for analysis of enrichment levels over background (YnMyr/Myr) and
response to inhibitor (Supporting Information Table S6). A subset of MG proteins, including almost all proteins
identified as having a YnMyr-modified N-terminus, were enriched over
Myr controls, and this enrichment reduced in response to the highest
concentrations of inhibitor (100 nM 1 and 20 μM 2) (Figure a). Examination of enrichment ratios (enrichment over Myr controls,
normalized to samples with no inhibitor; see Methods for detailed description of data processing and analysis) revealed
54 proteins that responded robustly to the highest concentrations
of both inhibitors 1 and 2. Of this subset,
only one did not contain an N-terminal glycine. Hierarchical clustering
was performed on the 54 putative hits, and 4 clusters of response
were defined (Supporting Information Figure
S12); protein responses were further examined by plotting enrichment
relative to concentration of inhibitor (Table ; Figure b; Supporting Information Figure S13). The sole non-MG protein (Tb927.8.2250, annotated as
a putative tRNA ligase) responded only to the highest concentration
of NMT inhibitor (Figure c) and may be a downstream or low-affinity off-target of the
inhibitor. Interestingly, this protein was identified by Emmer et
al. as S-acylated in PCF parasites.[49] The
remaining 53 hits, classed as “high confidence”, showed
a variety of robust dose–responses; a range of substrate sensitivity
toward NMT inhibition was also observed in human cells and Leishmania parasites.[12,23]
Figure 7
Chemical proteomic analysis
of YnMyr tagging in the presence of NMT inhibitors. BSF parasites
were labeled with YnMyr in the presence of inhibitors 1 (5, 10, 100 nM) and 2 (1, 5, 20 μM). Proteins
were subject to CuAAC, base treatment, enrichment, and on-bead digest
in technical duplicate and analyzed by LC-MS/MS with quantification
by LFQ. (a) Global data visualization after filtering to retain only
those proteins quantified in both YnMyr replicates and imputation
of missing values (see Methods for details).
(Left) Response to 100 nM inhibitor 1 plotted against
enrichment over myristic acid (Myr) controls. (Right) Response to
inhibitors 1 (100 nM) versus 2 (20 μM).
Proteins containing an N-terminal glycine (MG) and those for which
the YnMyr-modified peptide was identified using reagent AzRB or AzRTB
are indicated. (b) Dose–response plots (treatment with 1) for protein hits. Curves are color-coded based on clustering
(degree of response; see Supporting Information Figure S12). (c) Dose–response plots (treatment with 1) for other MG proteins not assigned as hits (gray) and for
outlier non-MG protein (Tb927.8.2250, black) that decreases only at
high concentrations of inhibitors. See also Supporting Information Table S6 and Figure S13 (dose–response curves for treatment with 2 and
for “medium confidence” hits).
Table 1
High- and Medium-Confidence N-Myristoylated Protein
Hitsa
Proteins were
identified by quantitative proteomics with YnMyr in combination with
NMT inhibitors. Mean normalized enrichment ratios (YnMyr/Myr) are
given, and cells are color-coded based on value (blue = 0, red = 1,
yellow = 50 percentile). Proteins for which the YnMyr-modified N-terminus
was detected (Mod. Pept.) and those identified as hits in PCF samples
are indicated. Some protein groups contained multiple proteins (“&others”).
See also Supporting Information Table S6.
Chemical proteomic analysis
of YnMyr tagging in the presence of NMT inhibitors. BSF parasites
were labeled with YnMyr in the presence of inhibitors 1 (5, 10, 100 nM) and 2 (1, 5, 20 μM). Proteins
were subject to CuAAC, base treatment, enrichment, and on-bead digest
in technical duplicate and analyzed by LC-MS/MS with quantification
by LFQ. (a) Global data visualization after filtering to retain only
those proteins quantified in both YnMyr replicates and imputation
of missing values (see Methods for details).
(Left) Response to 100 nM inhibitor 1 plotted against
enrichment over myristic acid (Myr) controls. (Right) Response to
inhibitors 1 (100 nM) versus 2 (20 μM).
Proteins containing an N-terminal glycine (MG) and those for which
the YnMyr-modified peptide was identified using reagent AzRB or AzRTB
are indicated. (b) Dose–response plots (treatment with 1) for protein hits. Curves are color-coded based on clustering
(degree of response; see Supporting Information Figure S12). (c) Dose–response plots (treatment with 1) for other MG proteins not assigned as hits (gray) and for
outlier non-MG protein (Tb927.8.2250, black) that decreases only at
high concentrations of inhibitors. See also Supporting Information Table S6 and Figure S13 (dose–response curves for treatment with 2 and
for “medium confidence” hits).Proteins were
identified by quantitative proteomics with YnMyr in combination with
NMT inhibitors. Mean normalized enrichment ratios (YnMyr/Myr) are
given, and cells are color-coded based on value (blue = 0, red = 1,
yellow = 50 percentile). Proteins for which the YnMyr-modified N-terminus
was detected (Mod. Pept.) and those identified as hits in PCF samples
are indicated. Some protein groups contained multiple proteins (“&others”).
See also Supporting Information Table S6.In addition to the 53 high-confidence
hits, a further 10 proteins showed a weaker dose–response to
NMT inhibitors, but this group included 7 proteins in which the YnMyr-modified
peptide was identified on the N-terminal glycine. The 10 proteins
were thus assigned as “medium-confidence” hits and include
FCaBP (previously identified as N-myristoylated)[20] and putative N-myristoylated protein MCA4.[21] The remaining MG proteins, which neither responded in a
dose-responsive manner to NMT inhibitors nor had an identified N-terminal
modified glycine, were classed as nonsubstrates and included ribosomal
proteins and others not expected to be myristoylated. Notably, two
widely used bioinformatics tools[35,56] for prediction
of whether a protein is a likely NMT substrate disagreed for 18 of
the high-confidence hits identified here and predicted no myristoylation
for an additional 7 (Supporting Information Figure S14 and Table S7). This is not
necessarily surprising given that these tools were trained on data
sets from other organisms and highlights the value of experimentally
identifying NMT substrates.Proteins for which the level of
YnMyr tagging responded in a dose-dependent manner to both NMT inhibitors
are highly likely to be NMT substrates (i.e., high-confidence hits).
These included Golgi reassembly stacking protein (GRASP), proteasome
regulatory ATPase subunit 2 (RPT2), five members of the ADP-ribosylation
factor (ARF) family of GTPases, four proteins involved in fatty acyl
CoA synthesis, four phosphatases (including PPEF), calpain-like proteins,
and many proteins of unknown function. Fifty percent of high-confidence
NMT substrate proteins identified here are associated with a loss
of fitness in RNAi knockdown experiments in different life stages
or conditions (Supporting Information Table
S6; Alsford et al.;[57] and data extracted
from TriTrypDB[33]) and merit further investigation
as substrates with the potential to mediate the antiparasitic effects
of TbNMT inhibitors.
Conclusions
Here we have used chemical
proteomics and a suite of chemical tools—bioorthogonally tagged
fatty acid analogues, CuAAC capture reagents with cleavable moieties
for myristoylation site identification, and N-myristoyltransferase
inhibitors—to explore protein lipidation in the protozoan pathogen T. brucei. We identify lipidated proteins in bloodstream
and procyclic form parasites and report the first comparative quantitative
analysis of stage-enriched lipidated proteins. We also show that alkyne
palmitate analogue YnPal can be used to tag S-acylated proteins in T. brucei; this analogue should prove a useful tool
for further exploring palmitoylacyltransferase enzymes as potential
drug targets. Furthermore, as we have previously shown in other organisms,[12,23] quantitative chemical proteomics combined with well-characterized
enzyme inhibitors proved to be a powerful combination for clearly
defining NMT substrates amid the complexity of metabolic tagging.
The N-myristoylated proteins identified here are involved in many
important cellular processes, and our data sets provide a rich resource
for future investigation of the complex and pleiotropic impact of
NMT inhibition in T. brucei. Data are
available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD004053. Finally,
tagging of proteins by other mechanisms, for example, incorporation
of YnMyr into the GPI anchor of the VSG as shown here, suggests that
such analogues may also be useful tools for probing the GPI anchor
and lipid metabolism pathways in trypanosomes.
Methods
Chemical Tools
The following chemical tools were synthesized as described previously:
YnMyr, YnPal, and AzTB;[58] AzMyr and YnTB;[26] inhibitors 1 and 2;[12] and AzRB and AzRTB.[25] Myristic and palmitic acids and all other chemicals were
purchased.
Parasite Culture
The T. brucei brucei BSF strain Lister 427 was maintained
in vitro at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in HMI-9 medium containing
2 μg/mL geneticin (Invitrogen).[59] The Lister 427 strain is monomorphic and has lost the ability to
differentiate from long-slender trypomastigotes into the short-stumpy
form. Cells were routinely maintained at a density <1 × 106/mL. The T. brucei brucei procyclic strain 449 was maintained in vitro at 26 °C in SDM-79
medium containing 25 μg/mL phleomycin.[59] Cells were routinely maintained at a density <1.5 × 107/mL. All culture media contained 10% tetracycline-free fetal
bovine serum (Autogen Bioclear).
Metabolic Tagging Experiments
Parasites were metabolically labeled by the addition of 100 μM
myristic acid or YnMyr to T. brucei BSF (set up at 2.5 × 105/mL in HMI-9 medium the
previous day) or PCF (5 × 106/mL in SDM-79). Cells
were then grown for 8 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 (BSF)
or for 18 h at 26 °C (PCF) before harvesting. Parasites were
lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium
deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% SDS, and 1× Complete EDTA-free
protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)), sonicated 3 × 10 s at amplitude
45 with 1 min intervals on ice, and then centrifuged at 16000g for 30 min at 4 °C. For inhibition experiments, parasites
were pretreated for 1 h with inhibitors 1–4 at indicated concentrations, and then Myr or YnMyr probe
was added for the remaining labeling time (8 h for BSF, 18 h for PCF).
CuAAC Labeling, Pull-down, and Gel-Based Analysis
CuAAC
chemistry, pull-down, and gel-based analysis were performed as described
previously.[23] In brief, proteins were precipitated
and resuspended, and CuAAC was performed as described.[26] Proteins were enriched on streptavidin or neutravidin-coated
beads. Visualization was carried out using an Ettan DIGE Imager (Amersham
Biosciences)-Cy3 channel to detect TAMRA-labeled proteins.
Proteomic
Sample Preparation and Analysis
Sample preparation for proteomics
analysis and LC-MS/MS was carried out as described previously (also
detailed in the Supporting Information).[12]
Data Processing: General Comments
The data were processed with MaxQuant version 1.5.3.8, and the peptides
were identified from the MS/MS spectra searched against the TriTrypDB-25
T. brucei TREU927 database using the Andromeda search engine. The
VSG protein for the 427 strain was not present in this database, and
so initial experiments B1 and B2 (see below) were searched against
the T. brucei Lister strain 427.
The TriTrypDB sequence for the identified VSG variant Tb427.BES40.22
was appended to the TREU927 FASTA file. Cysteine carbamidomethylation
was used as a fixed modification, and methionine oxidation and N-terminal
acetylation were used as variable modifications. The false-discovery
rate was set to 0.01 for peptides, proteins, and sites. Other parameters
were used as preset in the software. “Unique and razor peptides”
mode was selected to allow for protein grouping; this calculates ratios
from unique and razor peptides (razor peptides are uniquely assigned
to protein groups and not to individual proteins). LFQ experiments
in MaxQuant were performed using the built-in label-free quantification
algorithm (MaxLFQ).[34] Data were elaborated
using Perseus version 1.5.0.31, Excel, and Graphpad Prism. The data
have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD004053.
Data Analysis
Enrichment LC-MS/MS experimental design for
YnMyr samples (for each experiment, both Myr and YnMyr samples were
processed; Table ).
Table 2
Enrichment LC-MS/MS Experimental Design for YnMyr
Samples
expt
biological sample
reagent
expt
biological
sample
reagent
B1
BSF1
AzTB
P1
PCF1
AzTB
B2
BSF2
AzTB
P2
PCF2
AzTB
B3
BSF2
AzTB
P3
PCF1
AzTB
B4
BSF2
AzRB
P4
PCF2
AzTB
P5
PCF2
AzRTB
P6
PCF1
AzRB
BSF Analysis. Data Set: Experiments B1–B4
For the search, “match between runs” was enabled
within parameter groups but not between them (parameter groups: Myr,
YnMyr). Replicates were grouped together (groups: Myr, YnMyr). The
YnMyr protein group was filtered to require three valid values across
the four replicates and then filtered to retain only those proteins
present in biological duplicate (present in both experiments B1 and
B2/3/4). Label-free intensities were logarithmized (base 2), and empty
values were imputed with random numbers from a normal distribution,
the mean and standard deviation of which were chosen to simulate low-abundance
values close to noise level (impute criteria: width 0.1 and down shift
1.8; imputation for each sample individually). A modified t test with permutation-based FDR statistics was applied
(250 permutations; FDR 0.001; s0 1) to compare Myr and YnMyr groups.
PCF Analysis. Data Set: Experiments P1–P6
For the
search, “match between runs” was enabled within parameter
groups but not between them (parameter groups: Myr, YnMyr). Replicates
were grouped together (groups: Myr, YnMyr). The YnMyr protein group
was filtered to require three valid values across the four replicates
and then filtered to retain only those proteins present in biological
duplicate (present in both experiments P1/3/6 and P2/4/5). Label-free
intensities were logarithmized (base 2) and empty values were imputed
with random numbers from a normal distribution (impute criteria: width
0.1 and down shift 1.8; imputation for each sample individually).
A modified two-sample two-sided t test with permutation-based
FDR statistics was applied (250 permutations; FDR 0.001; s0 1) to
compare Myr and YnMyr groups.
BSF and PCF Comparisons.
Data Set: Experiments B1–B4 and P1–P6
Data
sets were searched together with MaxLFQ. Data were filtered for at
least three valid values in at least one group (groups: BSF_Myr, BSF_YnMyr,
PCF_Myr, PCF_YnMyr). The total data set was filtered to require three
BSF_YnMyr or four PCF_YnMyr valid values and then cross-referenced
with individual analyses (described above) to retain hits only. Missing
values were imputed (impute criteria: width 0.1 and down shift 1.8)
and two-sample t tests used to compare YnMyr intensities
across BSF and PCF (250 permutations; FDR 0.01, s0 2). Data were elaborated
in Excel and compared to literature data sets.[39,40,45]
Modified Peptide Analyses.
Data Sets: Experiments B4, P5, and P6
MaxQuant searches were
carried out as above with the following modifications: the minimum
peptide length was reduced to 5. This is because the N-terminus of
NMT substrates often contains a lysine residue,[35] resulting in short N-terminal tryptic peptides. Modification
with YnMyr and the expected portion of AzRB or AzRTB was specified
as a variable modification. YnMyr-modified peptide matches were filtered
to retain only those with a score (the Andromeda score for the best
identified among the MS/MS spectra) >40 and delta score (the score
difference to the second best peptide identification) >20.
YnPal
and YnMyr Comparisons (BSF). Data Set: YnMyr Experiments B2–B4.
YnPal: Three Technical Repeats (A–C, Processing from the Lysate
Stage) of One Biological Sample (YnPal and Pal Samples)
Data
were searched together by MaxLFQ. Data were filtered for at least
two valid values in at least one group (groups: Myr, YnMyr, Pal, YnPal).
Label-free intensities were logarithmized (base 2). YnMyr and YnPal
data sets were then analyzed separately: filtered (at least two valid
values in either Myr or YnMyr; at least two valid values in either
Pal or YnPal), missing values were imputed (impute criteria: width
0.1 and down shift 1.8) and two-sample t tests used
to define potential hits in each case (250 permutations; FDR 0.05,
s0 1). The total data set was then cross-referenced with individual
analyses to retain hits only (t test significant
proteins and those where modified peptide was identified). Missing
values were imputed (impute criteria: width 0.1 and down shift 1.8,
across total data set) and two-sample t tests used
to compare YnMyr and YnPal intensities (250 permutations; FDR 0.05,
s0 1). Data were elaborated in Excel and compared to a literature
data set.[49]
YnMyr Tagging in the Presence
of NMT Inhibitors (BSF). Groups (Conditions): YnMyr, Myr, 5 nM 1, 10 nM 1, 100 nM 1, 1 μM 2, 5 μM 2, and 20 μM 2
. All samples were prepared and processed in duplicate
(technical replicates A and B from the lysate stage). The “match
between runs” option (time window 0.7 min, alignment time window
20 min) in MaxQuant was enabled during the searches. LFQ data were
grouped and filtered to retain only those proteins present in both
YnMyr replicates. The mean of the technical replicates was calculated,
and then missing values were imputed from a normal distribution (width
0.1, downshift 1.8; separately for each data set). Response ratios
(YnMyr/(YnMyr + inhibitor)) and enrichment ratios ((YnMyr + inhibitor)/Myr)
were calculated, and enrichment ratios were subsequently normalized
to YnMyr only (no inhibitor) to compare between proteins and across
conditions. Proteins with −Log2((YnMyr + inhibitor)/Myr)
> 2 (response ratio > 2) for 100 nM 1 and 20 μM 2 were selected as potential hits. These hits were further
analyzed by plotting the dose–response curves (normalized enrichment
ratios).
Authors: William P Heal; Biljana Jovanovic; Sara Bessin; Megan H Wright; Anthony I Magee; Edward W Tate Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Brian T Emmer; Ernesto S Nakayasu; Christina Souther; Hyungwon Choi; Tiago J P Sobreira; Conrad L Epting; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Igor C Almeida; David M Engman Journal: Eukaryot Cell Date: 2010-12-30
Authors: Julie A Frearson; Stephen Brand; Stuart P McElroy; Laura A T Cleghorn; Ondrej Smid; Laste Stojanovski; Helen P Price; M Lucia S Guther; Leah S Torrie; David A Robinson; Irene Hallyburton; Chidochangu P Mpamhanga; James A Brannigan; Anthony J Wilkinson; Michael Hodgkinson; Raymond Hui; Wei Qiu; Olawale G Raimi; Daan M F van Aalten; Ruth Brenk; Ian H Gilbert; Kevin D Read; Alan H Fairlamb; Michael A J Ferguson; Deborah F Smith; Paul G Wyatt Journal: Nature Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Edwin A Saada; Z Pius Kabututu; Miguel Lopez; Michelle M Shimogawa; Gerasimos Langousis; Michael Oberholzer; Angelica Riestra; Zophonias O Jonsson; James A Wohlschlegel; Kent L Hill Journal: Eukaryot Cell Date: 2014-05-30
Authors: Emmanuelle Thinon; Remigiusz A Serwa; Malgorzata Broncel; James A Brannigan; Ute Brassat; Megan H Wright; William P Heal; Anthony J Wilkinson; David J Mann; Edward W Tate Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: William R Proto; Esther Castanys-Munoz; Alana Black; Laurence Tetley; Catherine X Moss; Luiz Juliano; Graham H Coombs; Jeremy C Mottram Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Mark D Rackham; Zhiyong Yu; James A Brannigan; William P Heal; Daniel Paape; K Victoria Barker; Anthony J Wilkinson; Deborah F Smith; Robin J Leatherbarrow; Edward W Tate Journal: Medchemcomm Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.597
Authors: Mark D Rackham; James A Brannigan; David K Moss; Zhiyong Yu; Anthony J Wilkinson; Anthony A Holder; Edward W Tate; Robin J Leatherbarrow Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Mark D Rackham; James A Brannigan; Kaveri Rangachari; Stephan Meister; Anthony J Wilkinson; Anthony A Holder; Robin J Leatherbarrow; Edward W Tate Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Andrés M Alonso; Valeria R Turowski; Diego M Ruiz; Barbara D Orelo; James J Moresco; John R Yates; María M Corvi Journal: Exp Parasitol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 2.011
Authors: Andrew S Bell; Zhiyong Yu; Jennie A Hutton; Megan H Wright; James A Brannigan; Daniel Paape; Shirley M Roberts; Charlotte L Sutherell; Markus Ritzefeld; Anthony J Wilkinson; Deborah F Smith; Robin J Leatherbarrow; Edward W Tate Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Malgorzata Broncel; Caia Dominicus; Luis Vigetti; Stephanie D Nofal; Edward J Bartlett; Bastien Touquet; Alex Hunt; Bethan A Wallbank; Stefania Federico; Stephen Matthews; Joanna C Young; Edward W Tate; Isabelle Tardieux; Moritz Treeck Journal: Elife Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Richard J Wall; Eva Rico; Iva Lukac; Fabio Zuccotto; Sara Elg; Ian H Gilbert; Yvonne Freund; M R K Alley; Mark C Field; Susan Wyllie; David Horn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 11.205