Literature DB >> 27330368

Response to: "[Miller's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".

Martin J Yaffe1.   

Abstract

Year:  2016        PMID： 27330368      PMCID： PMC4900854          DOI： 10.3747/co.23.3113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN： 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; D B Kopans; M Moskowitz; D E Sanders; E A Sickles; T To; C Wall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Counterpoint re: "Mammography screening-sticking to the science".

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working Group.

Authors:  Béatrice Lauby-Secretan; Chiara Scoccianti; Dana Loomis; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Véronique Bouvard; Franca Bianchini; Kurt Straif
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Response to Miller et al.

Authors:  László Tabár; Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  A critical appraisal of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; R A Jong; M J Yaffe; D Tritchler; G Lockwood; C J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Does surgery unfavourably perturb the "natural history" of early breast cancer by accelerating the appearance of distant metastases?

Authors:  Michael Baum; Romano Demicheli; William Hrushesky; Michael Retsky
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The randomized trial of mammography screening that was not-A cautionary tale.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe; Jean M Seely; Paula B Gordon; Shushiela Appavoo; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.136
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.