Literature DB >> 27327023

Altered Running Economy Directly Translates to Altered Distance-Running Performance.

Wouter Hoogkamer1, Shalaya Kipp, Barry A Spiering, Rodger Kram.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to quantify if small (1%-3%) changes in running economy quantitatively affect distance-running performance. Based on the linear relationship between metabolic rate and running velocity and on earlier observations that added shoe mass increases metabolic rate by ~1% per 100 g per shoe, we hypothesized that adding 100 and 300 g per shoe would slow 3000-m time-trial performance by 1% and 3%, respectively.
METHODS: Eighteen male sub-20-min 5-km runners completed treadmill testing, and three 3000-m time trials wearing control shoes and identical shoes with 100 and 300 g of discreetly added mass. We measured rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production and calculated metabolic rates for the treadmill tests, and we recorded overall running time for the time trials.
RESULTS: Adding mass to the shoes significantly increased metabolic rate at 3.5 m·s by 1.11% per 100 g per shoe (95% confidence interval = 0.88%-1.35%). While wearing the control shoes, participants ran the 3000-m time trial in 626.1 ± 55.6 s. Times averaged 0.65% ± 1.36% and 2.37% ± 2.09% slower for the +100-g and +300-g shoes, respectively (P < 0.001). On the basis of a linear fit of all the data, 3000-m time increased 0.78% per added 100 g per shoe (95% confidence interval = 0.52%-1.04%).
CONCLUSION: Adding shoe mass predictably degrades running economy and slows 3000-m time-trial performance proportionally. Our data demonstrate that laboratory-based running economy measurements can accurately predict changes in distance-running race performance due to shoe modifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27327023     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  40 in total

Review 1.  Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Justin A Ortega; Laura A Healey; Wannes Swinnen; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-hour Marathon Barrier.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram; Christopher J Arellano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  How do prosthetic stiffness, height and running speed affect the biomechanics of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations?

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Paolo Taboga; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Does an increase in energy return and/or longitudinal bending stiffness shoe features reduce the energetic cost of running?

Authors:  Nicolas Flores; Nicolas Delattre; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Step time asymmetry increases metabolic energy expenditure during running.

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Eric N Azua; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Implications of Impaired Endurance Performance following Single Bouts of Resistance Training: An Alternate Concurrent Training Perspective.

Authors:  Kenji Doma; Glen B Deakin; David J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Comparison of running and cycling economy in runners, cyclists, and triathletes.

Authors:  Wannes Swinnen; Shalaya Kipp; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Added lower limb mass does not affect biomechanical asymmetry but increases metabolic power in runners with a unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Ryan S Alcantara; Owen N Beck; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Connecting the legs with a spring improves human running economy.

Authors:  Cole S Simpson; Cara G Welker; Scott D Uhlrich; Sean M Sketch; Rachel W Jackson; Scott L Delp; Steve H Collins; Jessica C Selinger; Elliot W Hawkes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Somatosensory Perception of Running Shoe Mass may be influenced by Extended Wearing Time or Inclusion of a Personal Reference Shoe, Depending on Testing Method.

Authors:  James G Saxton; Benjamin R Mardis; Christopher L Kliethermes; David S Senchina
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.