Literature DB >> 30027520

Step time asymmetry increases metabolic energy expenditure during running.

Owen N Beck1,2,3, Eric N Azua4, Alena M Grabowski4,5.   

Abstract

To improve locomotor performance, coaches and clinicians encourage individuals with unilateral physical impairments to minimize biomechanical asymmetries. Yet, it is unknown if biomechanical asymmetries per se, affect metabolic energy expenditure in individuals with or without unilateral impairments during running. Thus, inter-leg biomechanical asymmetries may or may not influence distance-running performance.
PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether running with asymmetric step times affects metabolic rate in unimpaired individuals.
METHODS: Ten unimpaired individuals were instructed to run on a force-measuring treadmill at 2.8 m/s and contact the ground simultaneously to the beat of an audible metronome. The metronome either played at time intervals equal to the respective participant's preferred step times (0% asymmetry), or at time intervals that elicited asymmetric step times between legs (7, 14, and 21% step time asymmetry); stride time remained constant across all trials. We measured ground reaction forces and metabolic rates during each trial.
RESULTS: Every 10% increase in step time and stance average vertical ground reaction force asymmetry increased net metabolic power by 3.5%. Every 10% increase in ground contact time asymmetry increased net metabolic power by 7.8%. More asymmetric peak braking and peak propulsive ground reaction forces, leg stiffness, as well as positive and negative external mechanical work, but not peak vertical ground reaction force, increased net metabolic power during running. Step time asymmetry increases the net metabolic power of unimpaired individuals during running. Therefore, unimpaired individuals likely optimize distance-running performance by using symmetric step times and overall symmetric biomechanics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Economy; Kinematics; Kinetics; Symmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027520     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3939-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  50 in total

1.  The two power limits conditioning step frequency in human running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; P A Willems; P Franzetti; C Detrembleur
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The biological limits to running speed are imposed from the ground up.

Authors:  Peter G Weyand; Rosalind F Sandell; Danille N L Prime; Matthew W Bundle
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-01-21

3.  A biomechanical comparison of elite and good distance runners.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; M L Pollock; J Landa
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination.

Authors:  C F Munro; D I Miller; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations.

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Paolo Taboga; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-03-30

6.  Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Robert Wityk; Kenneth Silver; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  The metabolic and mechanical costs of step time asymmetry in walking.

Authors:  Richard G Ellis; Kevin C Howard; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Partitioning the metabolic cost of human running: a task-by-task approach.

Authors:  Christopher J Arellano; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Running springs: speed and animal size.

Authors:  C T Farley; J Glasheen; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Anatomically asymmetrical runners move more asymmetrically at the same metabolic cost.

Authors:  Elena Seminati; Francesca Nardello; Paola Zamparo; Luca P Ardigò; Niccolò Faccioli; Alberto E Minetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ground Contact Time Imbalances Strongly Related to Impaired Running Economy.

Authors:  Dustin P Joubert; Nicholas A Guerra; Eric J Jones; Erica G Knowles; Aaron D Piper
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-05-01

2.  Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism during overground and motorized treadmill running in Chinese middle-aged women.

Authors:  Shuo Li; Jing-Jing Xue; Ping Hong; Chao Song; Zi-Hong He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Continuous time series analysis on the effects of induced running fatigue on leg symmetry using kinematics and kinetic variables: Implications for knee joint injury during a countermovement jump.

Authors:  Zixiang Gao; Liang Zhao; Gusztáv Fekete; Gábor Katona; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Effects of running fatigue on lower extremity symmetry among amateur runners: From a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Zixiang Gao; Gusztáv Fekete; Julien S Baker; Minjun Liang; Rongrong Xuan; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Augmented Cooper test: Biomechanical contributions to endurance performance.

Authors:  Salil Apte; Simone Troxler; Cyril Besson; Vincent Gremeaux; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.