Literature DB >> 27318619

Coupled near-field and far-field exposure assessment framework for chemicals in consumer products.

Peter Fantke1, Alexi S Ernstoff2, Lei Huang3, Susan A Csiszar4, Olivier Jolliet3.   

Abstract

Humans can be exposed to chemicals in consumer products through product use and environmental emissions over the product life cycle. Exposure pathways are often complex, where chemicals can transfer directly from products to humans during use or exchange between various indoor and outdoor compartments until sub-fractions reach humans. To consistently evaluate exposure pathways along product life cycles, a flexible mass balance-based assessment framework is presented structuring multimedia chemical transfers in a matrix of direct inter-compartmental transfer fractions. By matrix inversion, we quantify cumulative multimedia transfer fractions and exposure pathway-specific product intake fractions defined as chemical mass taken in by humans per unit mass of chemical in a product. Combining product intake fractions with chemical mass in the product yields intake estimates for use in life cycle impact assessment and chemical alternatives assessment, or daily intake doses for use in risk-based assessment and high-throughput screening. Two illustrative examples of chemicals used in personal care products and flooring materials demonstrate how this matrix-based framework offers a consistent and efficient way to rapidly compare exposure pathways for adult and child users and for the general population. This framework constitutes a user-friendly approach to develop, compare and interpret multiple human exposure scenarios in a coupled system of near-field ('user' environment), far-field and human intake compartments, and helps understand the contribution of individual pathways to overall human exposure in various product application contexts to inform decisions in different science-policy fields for which exposure quantification is relevant.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical alternatives assessment; High-throughput risk screening; Life cycle impact assessment; Multimedia multi-pathway framework; Near-field consumer exposure; Product intake fraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27318619     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  14 in total

1.  A Model for Risk-Based Screening and Prioritization of Human Exposure to Chemicals from Near-Field Sources.

Authors:  Li Li; John N Westgate; Lauren Hughes; Xianming Zhang; Babak Givehchi; Liisa Toose; James M Armitage; Frank Wania; Peter Egeghy; Jon A Arnot
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways.

Authors:  Caroline L Ring; Jon A Arnot; Deborah H Bennett; Peter P Egeghy; Peter Fantke; Lei Huang; Kristin K Isaacs; Olivier Jolliet; Katherine A Phillips; Paul S Price; Hyeong-Moo Shin; John N Westgate; R Woodrow Setzer; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; David E Meyer; Kathie L Dionisio; Peter Egeghy; Kristin K Isaacs; Paul S Price; Kelly A Scanlon; Yu-Mei Tan; Kent Thomas; Daniel Vallero; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; David E Meyer; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  A framework for an alternatives assessment dashboard for evaluating chemical alternatives applied to flame retardants for electronic applications.

Authors:  Todd M Martin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Integrating exposure to chemicals in building materials during use stage.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Nicholas Anastas; Peter Egeghy; Daniel A Vallero; Olivier Jolliet; Jane Bare
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment.

Authors:  William Greggs; Thomas Burns; Peter Egeghy; Michelle R Embry; Peter Fantke; Bonnie Gaborek; Lauren Heine; Olivier Jolliet; Carolyn Lee; Derek Muir; Kathy Plotzke; Joseph Rinkevich; Neha Sunger; Jennifer Y Tanir; Margaret Whittaker
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Criteria pollutant impacts of volatile chemical products informed by near-field modeling.

Authors:  Momei Qin; Benjamin N Murphy; Kristin K Isaacs; Brian C McDonald; Quanyang Lu; Stuart A McKeen; Lauren Koval; Allen L Robinson; Christos Efstathiou; Chris Allen; Havala O T Pye
Journal:  Nat Sustain       Date:  2020-10-05

9.  Exposure and Toxicity Characterization of Chemical Emissions and Chemicals in Products: Global Recommendations and Implementation in USEtox.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Weihsueh A Chiu; Lesa Aylward; Richard Judson; Lei Huang; Suji Jang; Todd Gouin; Lorenz Rhomberg; Nicolò Aurisano; Thomas McKone; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.141

10.  High Throughput Risk and Impact Screening of Chemicals in Consumer Products.

Authors:  Olivier Jolliet; Lei Huang; Ping Hou; Peter Fantke
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 4.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.