Literature DB >> 27565317

High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products.

Susan A Csiszar1, Alexi S Ernstoff2, Peter Fantke2, David E Meyer3, Olivier Jolliet4.   

Abstract

We demonstrate the application of a high-throughput modeling framework to estimate exposure to chemicals used in personal care products (PCPs). As a basis for estimating exposure, we use the product intake fraction (PiF), defined as the mass of chemical taken by an individual or population per mass of a given chemical used in a product. We calculated use- and disposal- stage PiFs for 518 chemicals for five PCP archetypes. Across all product archetypes the use- and disposal- stage PiFs ranged from 10(-5) to 1 and 0 to 10(-3), respectively. There is a distinction between the use-stage PiF for leave-on and wash-off products which had median PiFs of 0.5 and 0.02 across the 518 chemicals, respectively. The PiF is a function of product characteristics and physico-chemical properties and is maximized when skin permeability is high and volatility is low such that there is no competition between skin and air losses from the applied product. PCP chemical contents (i.e. concentrations) were available for 325 chemicals and were combined with PCP usage characteristics and PiF yielding intakes summed across a demonstrative set of products ranging from 10(-8)-30 mg/kg/d, with a median of 0.1 mg/kg/d. The highest intakes were associated with body lotion. Bioactive doses derived from high-throughput in vitro toxicity data were combined with the estimated PiFs to demonstrate an approach to estimate bioactive equivalent chemical content and to screen chemicals for risk.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure modeling; High-throughput; Mass balance modeling; Personal care products; Product intake fraction; Risk screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565317      PMCID: PMC7359637          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  35 in total

1.  The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals.

Authors:  Peter P Egeghy; Richard Judson; Sumit Gangwal; Shad Mosher; Doris Smith; James Vail; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products.

Authors:  Alex Weir; Paul Westerhoff; Lars Fabricius; Kiril Hristovski; Natalie von Goetz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Exposure data for personal care products: hairspray, spray perfume, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash, and solid antiperspirant.

Authors:  Linda Loretz; Anne Marie Api; Leila Barraj; Joel Burdick; De Ann Davis; William Dressler; Enrico Gilberti; Gwendolyn Jarrett; Steve Mann; Y H Laurie Pan; Thomas Re; Kevin Renskers; Carolyn Scrafford; Sally Vater
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Development of a consumer product ingredient database for chemical exposure screening and prioritization.

Authors:  M-R Goldsmith; C M Grulke; R D Brooks; T R Transue; Y M Tan; A Frame; P P Egeghy; R Edwards; D T Chang; R Tornero-Velez; K Isaacs; A Wang; J Johnson; K Holm; M Reich; J Mitchell; D A Vallero; L Phillips; M Phillips; J F Wambaugh; R S Judson; T J Buckley; C C Dary
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Stochastic modeling of near-field exposure to parabens in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 6.  Risk assessment in the 21st century: roadmap and matrix.

Authors:  Michelle R Embry; Ammie N Bachman; David R Bell; Alan R Boobis; Samuel M Cohen; Michael Dellarco; Ian C Dewhurst; Nancy G Doerrer; Ronald N Hines; Angelo Moretto; Timothy P Pastoor; Richard D Phillips; J Craig Rowlands; Jennifer Y Tanir; Douglas C Wolf; John E Doe
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Plasma concentrations of parabens in postmenopausal women and self-reported use of personal care products: the NOWAC postgenome study.

Authors:  Torkjel M Sandanger; Sandra Huber; Morten K Moe; Tonje Braathen; Henriette Leknes; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Anran Wang; Kathie L Dionisio; Alicia Frame; Peter Egeghy; Richard Judson; R Woodrow Setzer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Refining aggregate exposure: example using parabens.

Authors:  Christina E Cowan-Ellsberry; Steven H Robison
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Simulated use and wash-off release of decamethylcyclopentasiloxane used in anti-perspirants.

Authors:  Todd Gouin; Roger van Egmond; Chris Sparham; Colin Hastie; Namrata Chowdhury
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  8 in total

1.  Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways.

Authors:  Caroline L Ring; Jon A Arnot; Deborah H Bennett; Peter P Egeghy; Peter Fantke; Lei Huang; Kristin K Isaacs; Olivier Jolliet; Katherine A Phillips; Paul S Price; Hyeong-Moo Shin; John N Westgate; R Woodrow Setzer; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Metabolites of n-Butylparaben and iso-Butylparaben Exhibit Estrogenic Properties in MCF-7 and T47D Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Thomas L Gonzalez; Rebecca K Moos; Christina L Gersch; Michael D Johnson; Rudy J Richardson; Holger M Koch; James M Rae
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; David E Meyer; Kathie L Dionisio; Peter Egeghy; Kristin K Isaacs; Paul S Price; Kelly A Scanlon; Yu-Mei Tan; Kent Thomas; Daniel Vallero; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA.

Authors:  Jon R Sobus; John F Wambaugh; Kristin K Isaacs; Antony J Williams; Andrew D McEachran; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Elin M Ulrich; Julia E Rager; Mark J Strynar; Seth R Newton
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment.

Authors:  William Greggs; Thomas Burns; Peter Egeghy; Michelle R Embry; Peter Fantke; Bonnie Gaborek; Lauren Heine; Olivier Jolliet; Carolyn Lee; Derek Muir; Kathy Plotzke; Joseph Rinkevich; Neha Sunger; Jennifer Y Tanir; Margaret Whittaker
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Exposure and Toxicity Characterization of Chemical Emissions and Chemicals in Products: Global Recommendations and Implementation in USEtox.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Weihsueh A Chiu; Lesa Aylward; Richard Judson; Lei Huang; Suji Jang; Todd Gouin; Lorenz Rhomberg; Nicolò Aurisano; Thomas McKone; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 7.  Building a European exposure science strategy.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Natalie von Goetz; Urs Schlüter; Jos Bessems; Alison Connolly; Tatsiana Dudzina; Andreas Ahrens; Jim Bridges; Marie A Coggins; André Conrad; Otto Hänninen; Gerhard Heinemeyer; Stylianos Kephalopoulos; Michael McLachlan; Tim Meijster; Veronique Poulsen; Dag Rother; Theo Vermeire; Susana Viegas; Jelle Vlaanderen; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Yuri Bruinen de Bruin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  High Throughput Risk and Impact Screening of Chemicals in Consumer Products.

Authors:  Olivier Jolliet; Lei Huang; Ping Hou; Peter Fantke
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 4.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.