Literature DB >> 27312934

Bioresorbable Stents in PCI.

Daniel Lindholm1,2, Stefan James3,4.   

Abstract

The evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention has been considerable. Coronary stents were introduced to avoid vessel recoil and reduce acute and late vessel complications. Later, drug-eluting stents were developed to decrease the neointimal hyperplasia associated with bare metal stents in order to reduce restenosis. However, very late stent thrombosis remains problematic, and the permanent presence of a metal stent could be associated with local inflammation and impaired vascular physiology. Thus, bioresorbable stents have been developed, to prevent recoil initially when this risk is the highest, with subsequent degradation over time, to avoid long-term complications of the presence of stents in the coronary vasculature. Here, we review the current status of bioresorbable stents in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with focus on the platforms that have been studied the most: ABSORB, DESolve, and DREAMS. In terms of clinical outcomes, bioresorbable stents have not yet shown superiority compared with current generation drug-eluting stents, but rather a signal of increased stent thrombosis. Further development and longer-term studies are needed before the routine implementation of bioresorbable stents in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioresorbable stents; Coronary artery disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312934     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-016-0750-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  38 in total

1.  Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  Serban Puricel; Diego Arroyo; Noé Corpataux; Gérard Baeriswyl; Sonja Lehmann; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Olivier Muller; Ludovic Allard; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Mario Togni; Jean-Jacques Goy; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  The evolution of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Omair Yousuf; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial.

Authors:  Michael Haude; Hüseyin Ince; Alexandre Abizaid; Ralph Toelg; Pedro Alves Lemos; Clemens von Birgelen; Evald Høj Christiansen; William Wijns; Franz-Josef Neumann; Christoph Kaiser; Eric Eeckhout; Soo Teik Lim; Javier Escaned; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.

Authors:  Bo Lagerqvist; Stefan K James; Ulf Stenestrand; Johan Lindbäck; Tage Nilsson; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Robert A Byrne; Gjin Ndrepepa; Sebastian Kufner; Jens Wiebe; Janika Repp; Heribert Schunkert; Massimiliano Fusaro; Takeshi Kimura; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Safety and performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS) in patients with de-novo coronary lesions: 12 month results of the prospective, multicentre, first-in-man BIOSOLVE-I trial.

Authors:  Michael Haude; Raimund Erbel; Paul Erne; Stefan Verheye; Hubertus Degen; Dirk Böse; Paul Vermeersch; Inge Wijnbergen; Neil Weissman; Francesco Prati; Ron Waksman; Jacques Koolen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty.

Authors:  U Sigwart; J Puel; V Mirkovitch; F Joffre; L Kappenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Sunil Kumar; Mario Fusaro; Nicholas Amoroso; Michael J Attubato; Frederick Feit; Deepak L Bhatt; James Slater
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.

Authors:  Stefan Verheye; John A Ormiston; James Stewart; Mark Webster; Elias Sanidas; Ricardo Costa; J Ribamar Costa; Daniel Chamie; Andrea S Abizaid; Ibraim Pinto; Lynn Morrison; Sara Toyloy; Vinayak Bhat; John Yan; Alexandre Abizaid
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 11.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.