Literature DB >> 26470647

Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial.

Michael Haude1, Hüseyin Ince2, Alexandre Abizaid3, Ralph Toelg4, Pedro Alves Lemos5, Clemens von Birgelen6, Evald Høj Christiansen7, William Wijns8, Franz-Josef Neumann9, Christoph Kaiser10, Eric Eeckhout11, Soo Teik Lim12, Javier Escaned13, Hector M Garcia-Garcia14, Ron Waksman15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Absorbable scaffolds were designed to overcome the limitations of conventional, non-absorbable metal-based drug-eluting stents. So far, only polymeric absorbable scaffolds are commercially available. We aimed to assess the safety and performance of a novel second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS 2G) in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions.
METHODS: We did this prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial at 13 percutaneous coronary intervention centres in Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, Germany, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Eligible patients had stable or unstable angina or documented silent ischaemia, and a maximum of two de-novo lesions with a reference vessel diameter between 2·2 mm and 3·7 mm. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at months 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36. Patients were scheduled for angiographic follow-up at 6 months, and a subgroup of patients was scheduled for intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and vasomotion assessment. All patients were recommended to take dual antiplatelet treatment for at least 6 months. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01960504.
FINDINGS: Between Oct 8, 2013, and May 22, 2015, we enrolled 123 patients with 123 coronary target lesions. At 6 months, mean in-segment late lumen loss was 0·27 mm (SD 0·37), and angiographically discernable vasomotion was documented in 20 (80%) of 25 patients. Intravascular ultrasound assessments showed a preservation of the scaffold area (mean 6·24 mm(2) [SD 1·15] post-procedure vs 6·21 mm(2) [1·22] at 6 months) with a low mean neointimal area (0·08 mm(2) [0·09]), and optical coherence tomography did not detect any intraluminal mass. Target lesion failure occurred in four (3%) patients: one (<1%) patient died from cardiac death, one (<1%) patient had periprocedural myocardial infarction, and two (2%) patients needed clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis was observed.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that implantation of the DREAMS 2G device in de-novo coronary lesions is feasible, with favourable safety and performance outcomes at 6 months. This novel absorbable metal scaffold could be an alternative to absorbable polymeric scaffolds for treatment of obstructive coronary disease. FUNDING: Biotronik AG.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26470647     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00447-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  51 in total

1.  Coronary intervention in 2015: Improvement of long-term outcomes after PCI.

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation: to go too far is as bad as to fall short.

Authors:  Francesco Costa; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10

Review 3.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: balloons, stents and scaffolds.

Authors:  Roisin Colleran; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Bioresorbable Stents in PCI.

Authors:  Daniel Lindholm; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Novel Zinc / Tungsten Carbide Nanocomposite as Bioabsorbable Implant.

Authors:  Zeyi Guan; Chase S Linsley; Injoo Hwang; Gongcheng Yao; Benjamin M Wu; Xiaochun Li
Journal:  Mater Lett       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 3.423

Review 7.  Bioresorbable Polymers and Stent Devices.

Authors:  Payam Dehghani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 8.  Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: Deployment Tips and Tricks and the Future of the Technology.

Authors:  J Ribamar Costa; Alexandre Abizaid
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

9.  Long-term surveillance of zinc implant in murine artery: Surprisingly steady biocorrosion rate.

Authors:  Adam J Drelich; Shan Zhao; Roger J Guillory; Jaroslaw W Drelich; Jeremy Goldman
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-what does the future bring?

Authors:  Jacek Bil; Robert J Gil
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.