Literature DB >> 27312228

Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication.

Daniël A Korevaar1, Jérémie F Cohen2, René Spijker3, Ian J Saldanha4, Kay Dickersin4, Gianni Virgili5, Lotty Hooft6, Patrick M M Bossuyt7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether conference abstracts that report higher estimates of diagnostic accuracy are more likely to reach full-text publication in a peer-reviewed journal. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We identified abstracts describing diagnostic accuracy studies, presented between 2007 and 2010 at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting. We extracted reported estimates of sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Between May and July 2015, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify corresponding full-text publications; if needed, we contacted abstract authors. Cox regression was performed to estimate associations with full-text publication, where sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were logit transformed, and DOR was log transformed.
RESULTS: A full-text publication was found for 226/399 (57%) included abstracts. There was no association between reported estimates of sensitivity and full-text publication (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.98, 1.22]). The same applied to specificity (HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.88, 1.14]), AUC (HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.75, 1.09]), and DOR (HR 1.01 [95% CI 0.94, 1.09]).
CONCLUSION: Almost half of the ARVO conference abstracts describing diagnostic accuracy studies did not reach full-text publication. Studies in abstracts that mentioned higher accuracy estimates were not more likely to be reported in a full-text publication. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic accuracy studies; Meta-analyses; Ophthalmology; Publication bias; Reporting bias; Sensitivity and specificity; Systematic reviews; Time-lag bias

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312228      PMCID: PMC5148658          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  36 in total

1.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:  Catherine D DeAngelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Charlotte Haug; John Hoey; Richard Horton; Sheldon Kotzin; Christine Laine; Ana Marusic; A John P M Overbeke; Torben V Schroeder; Hal C Sox; Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Prospective registration of marker evaluation studies: time to act.

Authors:  Lotty Hooft; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Conference abstracts of a new oncology drug do not always lead to full publication: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Michelle E Kho; Melissa C Brouwers
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-04       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  No evidence of bias in the process of publication of diagnostic accuracy studies in stroke submitted as abstracts.

Authors:  Miriam Brazzelli; Stephanie C Lewis; Jonathan J Deeks; Peter A G Sandercock
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Eleanor A Ochodo; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Lotty Hooft
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: time for action.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Douglas G Altman; Patrick M Bossuyt
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 8.  Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Cesar Ugarte-Gil; Christine Schmucker; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  The time has come to register diagnostic and prognostic research.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  W Annefloor van Enst; Eleanor Ochodo; Rob J P M Scholten; Lotty Hooft; Mariska M Leeflang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication.

Authors:  A Dehmoobad Sharifabadi; D A Korevaar; T A McGrath; N van Es; R A Frank; L Cherpak; W Dang; J P Salameh; F Nguyen; C Stanley; M D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.

Authors:  Lee Treanor; Robert A Frank; Lindsay A Cherpak; Ana Dehmoobad Sharifabadi; Jean-Paul Salameh; Zachary Hallgrimson; Nicholas Fabiano; Trevor A McGrath; Noemie Kraaijpoel; Jason Yao; Daniel A Korevaar; Patrick M Bossuyt; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Frequency of Abstracts Presented at Eye and Vision Conferences Being Developed Into Full-Length Publications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Yu E; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Kolade Fapohunda; Tianjing Li; Roberta W Scherer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Jean-Paul Salameh; Yasaman Vali; Jérémie F Cohen; Matthew D F McInnes; René Spijker; Patrick M Bossuyt
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  Publication outcome of abstracts submitted to the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting.

Authors:  Michael Mimouni; Mark Krauthammer; Hamza Abualhasan; Hanan Badarni; Kamal Imtanis; Gilad Allon; Liron Berkovitz; Eytan Z Blumenthal; Francis B Mimouni; Gil Amarilyo
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2018-01-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.