Literature DB >> 19124219

Conference abstracts of a new oncology drug do not always lead to full publication: proceed with caution.

Michelle E Kho1, Melissa C Brouwers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conference abstracts, often the first public record of a study, serve as a catalyst to initiate clinical and policy change. On average, 45% of all conference abstracts subsequently appear as full publications; however, the generalizability of this finding to studies of one intervention, in one population, is unknown. Our objectives were to determine the full publication rate of a cohort of abstracts, median time to publication, and predictors of these relationships.
METHODS: We included the first 5 years of clinical abstract reports of rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) from American Society of Hematology (ASH) meetings (1997-2001), identified all unique studies, and used electronic databases to identify full publications. We determined the full publication rate, median time to publication, and predictors of these outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 109 abstracts representing 86 unique studies, the publication rate was 52.3% (45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.3, 63.2), and the median time to publication, 1.4 years with 6.8 years' follow-up. Author affiliation with industry (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]=4.60 [1.32, 16.08] and presentation type (oral OR=5.94 [1.31, 26.88], poster OR=3.39 [1.24, 9.25]; reference, publication in conference abstract book only) independently predicted subsequent full publication in the adjusted analysis. We identified no predictors of time to publication.
INTERPRETATION: We suggest cautious consideration of data from conference proceedings to inform new technology clinical or policy decisions. Future work needs to examine the generalizability of our results to other diseases and technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19124219     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences: part 2: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on authorship, access to trial data, and trial registration and publication.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Henry Pachl; Ulrich Limbach; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Klaus Lieb; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Publication rates of abstracts presented at five national pharmacy association meetings.

Authors:  Emily Prohaska; Joyce Generali; Kevin Zak; Dennis Grauer
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-03

Review 3.  Comparison of published and unpublished phase I clinical cancer trials: an analysis of the CliniclTrials.gov database.

Authors:  D Shepshelovich; H Goldvaser; L Wang; A R Abdul Razak
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.

Authors:  Lee Treanor; Robert A Frank; Lindsay A Cherpak; Ana Dehmoobad Sharifabadi; Jean-Paul Salameh; Zachary Hallgrimson; Nicholas Fabiano; Trevor A McGrath; Noemie Kraaijpoel; Jason Yao; Daniel A Korevaar; Patrick M Bossuyt; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen; René Spijker; Ian J Saldanha; Kay Dickersin; Gianni Virgili; Lotty Hooft; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Joerg J Meerpohl; Nadine Pfeifer; Christine Schmucker; Guido Schwarzer; Erik von Elm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-20

Review 7.  A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them?

Authors:  Justin Neves; John N Lavis; M Kent Ranson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2012-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.