Literature DB >> 18593957

Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: time for action.

Nader Rifai, Douglas G Altman, Patrick M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18593957     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.108993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 3.  Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Sonia D'Arrigo; Sofia Cacciola; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Marlijn J A Kamps; Mauro Oddo; Fabio S Taccone; Arianna Di Rocco; Frederick J A Meijer; Erik Westhall; Massimo Antonelli; Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan; Tobias Cronberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.

Authors:  L Baccaglini; J J Shuster; J Cheng; D W Theriaque; V J Schoenbach; S L Tomar; C Poole
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.511

5.  Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen; René Spijker; Ian J Saldanha; Kay Dickersin; Gianni Virgili; Lotty Hooft; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Center of excellence in research reporting in neurosurgery--diagnostic ontology.

Authors:  Amrapali Zaveri; Jatin Shah; Shreyasee Pradhan; Clarissa Rodrigues; Jacson Barros; Beng Ti Ang; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports.

Authors:  Daniël A Korevaar; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Lotty Hooft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Overview of data-synthesis in systematic reviews of studies on outcome prediction models.

Authors:  Tobias van den Berg; Martijn W Heymans; Stephanie S Leone; David Vergouw; Jill A Hayden; Arianne P Verhagen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Jill A Hayden; Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons; Keith Abrams; Panayiotis A Kyzas; Núria Malats; Andrew Briggs; Sara Schroter; Douglas G Altman; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond.

Authors:  R D Riley; W Sauerbrei; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.