| Literature DB >> 27309986 |
Eva M Serrao1,2, Tiago B Rodrigues1,2, Ferdia A Gallagher1,3, Mikko I Kettunen1,2,4, Brett W C Kennedy1,2, Sarah L Vowler1, Keith A Burling5, Kevin M Brindle1,2.
Abstract
Imaging of the metabolism of hyperpolarized [1-(13) C]pyruvate has shown considerable promise in preclinical studies in oncology, particularly for the assessment of early treatment response. The repeatability of measurements of (13) C label exchange between pyruvate and lactate was determined in a murine lymphoma model in fasted and non-fasted animals. The fasted state showed lower intra-individual variability, although the [1-(13) C]lactate/[1-(13) C]pyruvate signal ratio was significantly greater in fasted than in non-fasted mice, which may be explained by the higher tumor lactate concentrations in fasted animals. These results indicate that the fasted state may be preferable for the measurement of (13) C label exchange between pyruvate and lactate, as it reduces the variability and therefore should make it easier to detect the effects of therapy.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; fasting; hyperpolarization; lymphoma; pyruvate; repeatability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27309986 PMCID: PMC4973679 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NMR Biomed ISSN: 0952-3480 Impact factor: 4.044
Mean coefficient of variation of k P and the hyperpolarized [1‐13C]lactate/[1‐13C]pyruvate signal ratio in fasted and non‐fasted tumor‐bearing mice following repeated measurements
| HP [1‐13C]pyruvate |
| CCC | Mean | SD | COV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (95% CI) | |||||
| Fasted | |||||
|
| 8 | 0.89 (0.60–0.97) | 0.141 | 0.016 | 11.773 |
| Lac/Pyr | 8 | 0.83 (0.44–0.95) | 5.671 | 0.942 | 14.998 |
| Non‐fasted | |||||
|
| 8 | 0.62 (0.03–0.89) | 0.1 | 0.021 | 24.767 |
| Lac/Pyr | 8 | 0.47 (−0.14–0.82) | 3.563 | 0.934 | 29.499 |
| Fasted |
|
| Lac/Pyr | ||
| 1st measurement | 11 | 0.137 ± 0.05 | 5.49 ± 2.23 | ||
| 2nd measurement | 10 | 0.138 ± 0.06 | 5.41 ± 3.04 | ||
| Non‐fasted |
|
| Lac/Pyr | ||
| 1st measurement | 17 | 0.108 ± 0.04 | 3.67 ± 1.7 | ||
| 2nd measurement | 8 | 0.107 ± 0.03 | 3.89 ± 1.25 | ||
CCC, concordance correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval; COV, coefficient of variation; HP, hyperpolarized; k P, apparent exchange rate constant of conversion of pyruvate to lactate; Lac, lactate; Pyr, pyruvate; SD, standard deviation.
k P and [1‐13C]Lac/[1‐13C]Pyr signal ratios were calculated from the time courses of 13C labeling in lactate and pyruvate in tumors in fasted and non‐fasted mice, acquired 4 h apart. The mean, SD, intra‐individual COV and CCC were calculated from 16 measurements for both the fasted and non‐fasted animals.
p = 0.01, significantly different from non‐fasted animals
p = 0.02, significantly different from non‐fasted animals
Figure 1Schematic representation of study design. EL4 tumor‐bearing mice were randomly divided into two groups: fasted for 18 h and non‐fasted. Mice then underwent the same imaging protocol twice in the same day, with a 4‐h recovery period between examinations, in which the non‐fasted mice were given access to food. The first and second 13C spectroscopic examinations are referred to as the 1st and 2nd scans, respectively. The tumor [1‐13C]lactate/[1‐13C]pyruvate ([1‐13C]Lac/[1‐13C]Pyr) signal ratio, at 30 s after injection of hyperpolarized (HP) [1‐13C]Pyr, and k P were calculated from the time course of pyruvate (Pyr) and lactate (Lac) labeling. In another group of animals, the ratio of the area under the contrast agent concentration curve (AUC) in the tumor and adjacent muscle was calculated after injection of contrast agent at each of the two time points, with the mice at the second time point having had an injection of unlabeled, non‐HP, Pyr at the first time point. A different cohort of mice, prepared in the same manner, was sacrificed at three different time points: baseline (BL, 0) (no injection of Pyr), 1 (after injection of Pyr) and 2 (after two injections of Pyr, 4 h apart), with each mouse submitted to at least 30 min of anesthesia, which is the time for which the animals were anesthetized for the HP [1‐13C]Pyr studies.
Figure 2Repeatability of k P and [1‐13C]lactate/[1‐13C]pyruvate ([1‐13C]Lac/[1‐13C]Pyr) signal ratio measurements in fasted mice (a–d) and non‐fasted mice (e–h) (see Fig. 1). Measurements in a single animal from the 1st scan (measurement 1) are plotted against measurements from the same animal from the 2nd scan (measurement 2). The full line indicates the best‐fit line between these two measurements (a & c, e & g). The broken lines indicate the 95% confidence limits of the best‐fit line. The dotted lines represent perfect agreement between the two measurements. For each mouse, the differences in k P between the 1st and 2nd scans are plotted against the average of k P from the 1st and 2nd scans (b & f). This Bland–Altman (BA) plot 23 was used to test the assumption of constant variances across the differences in k P . The full line at 0.00 is that of perfect agreement between the measurements of k P from the 1st and 2nd scans, and the full line above is the mean difference of k P between the 1st and 2nd scans. The broken lines indicate the 95% confidence limits of agreement. The dotted lines represent the 95% confidence intervals for these limits of agreement. The BA plots for the [1‐13C]Lac/[1‐13C]Pyr ratios are shown in (d & h).
Measurements of tumor perfusion using dynamic contrast agent‐enhanced 1H MRI
| AUC (tumor/muscle) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasted 1st scan | Fasted 2nd scan | Non‐fasted 1st scan | Non‐fasted 2nd scan |
| 6.8 ± 2.8 | 9.7 ± 4.7 | 12.7 ± 5.6 | 5.9 ± 3.0 |
Tumor/muscle (thigh) ratio for the area under the contrast agent concentration curve (AUC) at 45 s after injection of contrast agent for fasted and non‐fasted EL4 tumor‐bearing mice. Acquisitions were performed at the same time points as for the hyperpolarized [1‐13C]pyruvate study, with mice from Group 2 having received a dose of unlabeled non‐polarized pyruvate (10 mL/kg, 82 mm) and 30 min of anesthesia 4 h before the contrast agent‐enhanced 1H images were acquired. Mean ± standard error of the mean.
Blood and tumor metabolite concentrations and excised tumor and mouse weights in fasted and non‐fasted mice
| Sample | Metabolite | Groups (mean ± SD) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasted (baseline) | Fasted 1 | Fasted 2 | Non‐fasted (baseline) | Non‐fasted 1 | Non‐fasted 2 | ||
| Tumor concentration | Lactate (μmol/g wet tissue) | 19.1 ± 2.7 ( | 15.5 ± 2.0 ( | 10.8 ± 4.1 ( | 15.8 ± 5.9 ( | ||
| Tumor concentration | Alanine (μmol/g wet tissue) | 3.9 ± 1.4 ( | 2.9 ± 1.1 ( | 2.6 ± 0.9 ( | 5.3 ± 1.5 ( | ||
| Blood concentration | Lactate (mmol/L) | 10.2 ± 2.9 ( | 10.1 ± 2.6 ( | 13.0 ± 1.8 ( | 8.7 ± 0.8 ( | 8.9 ± 1.4 ( | 11.9 ± 1.3 ( |
| Blood concentration | Pyruvate (μmol/L) | 140 ± 45 ( | 193 ± 35 ( | 183 ± 30 ( | 110 ± 14 ( | 128 ± 19 ( | 135 ± 29 ( |
| Mouse weight (g) | 20.0 ± 0.9 ( | 23.7 ± 1.7 ( | 20.3 ± 0.8 ( | 25.3 ± 0.6 ( | 25.4 ± 3.9 ( | 24.4 ± 1.7 ( | |
| Tumor weight (g) | 0.8 ± 0.5 ( | 0.9 ± 0.6 ( | 0.7 ± 0.1 ( | 1.3 ± 0.3 ( | |||
Blood metabolite concentrations were determined using spectrophotometric assays, and tumor alanine and lactate concentrations were measured by 1H NMR. Group 0 (baseline), anesthetized for 30 min; Group 1, 30 min of anesthesia plus a bolus injection of 10 mL/kg of 82 mm unlabeled pyruvate; Group 2, same as Group 1, plus a 4‐h recovery period, a second period of anesthesia for 30 min and another injection of 10 mL/kg of 82 mm unlabeled pyruvate. Mean ± standard deviation;
p < 0.05.
Significantly different from non‐fasted 1.
Significantly different from fasted baseline.
Significantly different from fasted 2.