Literature DB >> 24503347

¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT patient preparation: a review of the literature.

Devaki Shilpa Surasi1, Pradeep Bhambhvani, Jon A Baldwin, Samuel E Almodovar, Janis P O'Malley.   

Abstract

For many types of cancer, (18)F-FDG PET/CT is commonly used in evaluation and management, including tumor diagnosis, staging, restaging, treatment monitoring, and radiation therapy planning. Meticulous patient preparation including restrictions of diet and activity and management of blood glucose levels in diabetic patients, as well as an awareness of the effect of medications and environmental conditions, plays an important role toward obtaining good-quality images, which are essential for accurate interpretation. Protocol guidelines for performing PET/CT have been proposed by various societies and groups, including the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the American College of Radiology, and the National Cancer Institute. Standardization of the PET/CT procedure is necessary to enable use of metabolic parameters as imaging biomarkers in routine clinical decision making and to ensure reproducibility and allow comparison examinations across different sites. Though several published articles, including various society guidelines, have addressed the relevant patient preparation variables individually, we believe there is need for further clarification. This article summarizes existing data and proposes a standard patient preparation protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; consensus guidelines; oncology; patient preparation; standardization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24503347     DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.113.132621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  29 in total

1.  Distinctive FDG-PET/CT Findings in Acute Neurological Hospital Care.

Authors:  Josef G Heckmann; Wolfgang Niedermeier; Markus Büchner; Bernhard Scher
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2018-10-15

2.  Single-Cell Analysis of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Droplet Radiofluidics.

Authors:  Silvan Türkcan; Julia Nguyen; Marta Vilalta; Bin Shen; Frederick T Chin; Guillem Pratx; Paul Abbyad
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Noninvasive 89Zr-Transferrin PET Shows Improved Tumor Targeting Compared with 18F-FDG PET in MYC-Overexpressing Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kelly E Henry; Thomas R Dilling; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Kimberly J Edwards; Michael J Evans; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Unintended Consequence of High-Dose Vitamin C Therapy for an Oncology Patient: Evaluation of Ascorbic Acid Interference With Three Hospital-Use Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Brooke M Katzman; Brandon R Kelley; Gayle R Deobald; Nikki K Myhre; Sean A Agger; Brad S Karon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-07

5.  Difference in F-18 FDG Uptake After Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in Healthy Sedated Subjects.

Authors:  Jong-Ryool Oh; Ji-Hyoung Seo; Woo-Jin Chang; Seung-Il Bae; In-Wook Song; Jin-Gu Bong; Hye-Yeon Jeong; So-Young Park; Jeongyup Bae; Hyundae Yoon
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-21

6.  PET imaging of bacterial infections with fluorine-18-labeled maltohexaose.

Authors:  Xinghai Ning; Wonewoo Seo; Seungjun Lee; Kiyoko Takemiya; Mohammad Rafi; Xuli Feng; Daiana Weiss; Xiaojian Wang; Larry Williams; Vernon M Camp; Malveaux Eugene; W Robert Taylor; Mark Goodman; Niren Murthy
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 7.  [PET-CT in head and neck cancer].

Authors:  T Send; B Kreppel; F C Gaertner; R A Bundschuh; H Strunk; F Bootz; M Essler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Microfluidic Platform for the Isolation of Cancer-Cell Subpopulations Based on Single-Cell Glycolysis.

Authors:  Claudia Zielke; Ching W Pan; Adriana J Gutierrez Ramirez; Cameron Feit; Chandler Dobson; Catherine Davidson; Brody Sandel; Paul Abbyad
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Imaging for Response Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Asser A Elkassem; Samuel J Galgano; Suzanne E Lapi; Benjamin M Larimer; Savannah C Partridge; C Chad Quarles; Kirsten Reeves; Tiara S Napier; Patrick N Song; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stefanie Woodard; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.446

10.  Multimodal Nanocarrier Probes Reveal Superior Biodistribution Quantification by Isotopic Analysis over Fluorescence.

Authors:  Hongping Deng; Christian J Konopka; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Kelly S Swanson; Lawrence W Dobrucki; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.