| Literature DB >> 27309537 |
Daniel A Monti1, George Zabrecky1, Daniel Kremens2, Tsao-Wei Liang2, Nancy A Wintering1, Jingli Cai3, Xiatao Wei3, Anthony J Bazzan1, Li Zhong1, Brendan Bowen1, Charles M Intenzo4, Lorraine Iacovitti3, Andrew B Newberg1,3.
Abstract
BACKGOUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the biological and clinical effects of n-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) in Parkinson's disease (PD).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27309537 PMCID: PMC4911055 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Fig 2mDA neurons derived from hESCs were treated with N-acetyl cysteine at 10 μM for 3 days before challenge with rotenone (15nM and 30 nM) for 24 hours.
TH+ neurons were quantified after cells were fixed and stained. Data was normalized as percentage of surviving mDA neurons compared to untreated control (100%). Treatment groups were compared with rotenone only groups using unpaired t-test. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.
Demographics for the study subjects per group.
| NAC Group | Control Group | |
|---|---|---|
| 6M/6F | 5M/6F | |
| 59.6±8.2 | 62.9±7.6 | |
| 3.4±2.2 | 3.4±1.8 | |
| 1.8±0.5 | 1.6±0.5 | |
| 8/4 | 6/5 |
Mean pre- and post-Tx dopamine transporter binding measures.
| Group | ROI | Time | Mean | LCL95% | UCL95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | caud | pre-Tx | 2.85 | 2.64 | 3.06 |
| C | put | pre-Tx | 1.80 | 1.59 | 2.02 |
| C | caud | post-Tx | 2.77 | 2.55 | 2.98 |
| C | put | post-Tx | 1.66 | 1.45 | 1.88 |
| N | caud | pre-Tx | 2.60 | 2.40 | 2.81 |
| N | put | pre-Tx | 1.64 | 1.44 | 1.84 |
| N | caud | post-Tx | 2.75 | 2.55 | 2.96 |
| N | put | post-Tx | 1.77 | 1.56 | 1.97 |
Mean pre-to-post-Tx differences in dopamine transporter binding.
| Comparison | Mean Difference | LCL95% | UCL95% | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caud pre-to-Post Tx change in group N | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.014 |
| Put pre-to-Post Tx change in group N | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.039 |
| Caud pre-to-Post Tx change in group C | -0.09 | -0.21 | 0.04 | 0.171 |
| Put pre-to-Post Tx change in group C | -0.14 | -0.26 | -0.02 | 0.027 |
| Caud pre-to-Post Tx change in group N vs. C | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.007 |
| Put pre-to-Post Tx change in group N vs. C | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.43 | 0.003 |
Fig 3Pre and post NAC DaTscans (left and right respectively) from one particularly responsive patient (A) shows a substantial increase in dopamine transporter binding in the basal ganglia (arrows). We also present (B) the paired t test results overlaid onto a standard MRI template using SPM8 software showing significantly greater binding (p<0.05) post NAC in the basal ganglia.
Mean pre- and post-Tx UPDRS Total Score.
| Group | Time | Mean | LCL95% | UCL95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | pre-Tx | 20.2 | 15.4 | 24.9 |
| C | post-Tx | 22.2 | 17.4 | 26.9 |
| N | pre-Tx | 25.6 | 21.1 | 30.1 |
| N | post-Tx | 22.3 | 17.8 | 26.9 |
Significant predictors of UPDRS Total Score.
| Comparison | Mean Difference | LCL95% | UCL95% | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender M vs. F | 9.62 | 3.26 | 15.99 | 0.005 |
| Pre-to-Post Tx change in group N | -3.25 | -5.33 | -1.17 | 0.004 |
| Pre-to-Post Tx change in group C | -2.00 | -4.17 | 0.17 | 0.069 |
| Pre-to-Post Tx change in group N vs. C | -1.25 | -4.26 | 1.76 | 0.397 |