Literature DB >> 18228568

Placebo response in Parkinson's disease: comparisons among 11 trials covering medical and surgical interventions.

Christopher G Goetz1, Joanne Wuu, Michael P McDermott, Charles H Adler, Stanley Fahn, Curt R Freed, Robert A Hauser, Warren C Olanow, Ira Shoulson, P K Tandon, Sue Leurgans.   

Abstract

Placebo-associated improvements have been previously documented in small series of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Using a strict definition of placebo-associated improvement, we examined rates and timing of placebo responses to identify patient- and study-based characteristics, predicting positive placebo response in several PD clinical trials. We collected individual patient data from the placebo groups of 11 medical and surgical treatment trials involving PD patients with differing PD severities and placebo-assignment likelihoods. We defined a positive placebo response as > or = 50% improvement in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor (UPDRSm) score or a decrease by > or = 2 points on at least two UPDRSm items compared to baseline. We calculated positive placebo response rates at early (3-7 weeks), mid (8-18 weeks), and late (23-35 weeks) stages of follow-up. Odds ratios for patient- and study-based characteristics were obtained from a model fitted using generalized estimating equations. There were 858 patients on placebo who met inclusion criteria for analysis. Three studies involved patients without need of symptomatic treatment, two involved patients without motor fluctuations needing symptomatic treatment, and six (three medical and three surgical) involved patients with motor fluctuations. The overall placebo response rate was 16% (range: 0-55%). Patients with higher baseline UPDRSm scores and studies that focused on PD with motor fluctuations, surgical interventions, or those with a higher probability of placebo assignment showed increased odds of positive placebo response. Placebo responses were temporally distributed similarly during early, mid, and late phases of follow-up. Placebo-related improvements occur in most PD clinical trials and are similarly distributed across all 6 months of follow-up. Recognition of factors that impact placebo response rates should be incorporated into individual study designs for PD clinical trials. 2008 Movement Disorder Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18228568     DOI: 10.1002/mds.21894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  70 in total

Review 1.  α6β2* and α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as drug targets for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Maryka Quik; Susan Wonnacott
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 2.  Missing pieces in the Parkinson's disease puzzle.

Authors:  Jose A Obeso; Maria C Rodriguez-Oroz; Christopher G Goetz; Concepcion Marin; Jeffrey H Kordower; Manuel Rodriguez; Etienne C Hirsch; Matthew Farrer; Anthony H V Schapira; Glenda Halliday
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Another face of placebo: the lessebo effect in Parkinson disease: meta-analyses.

Authors:  Tiago A Mestre; Prakesh Shah; Connie Marras; George Tomlinson; Anthony E Lang
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Parkinson disease: Poor results for retinal cell transplants in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  M Angela Cenci; Håkan Widner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Mechanisms for alternative treatments in Parkinson's disease: acupuncture, tai chi, and other treatments.

Authors:  Bijan D Ghaffari; Benzi Kluger
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Placebo effect of medication cost in Parkinson disease: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Matthew M Norris; James C Eliassen; Alok Dwivedi; Matthew S Smith; Christi Banks; Jane B Allendorfer; Anthony E Lang; David E Fleck; Michael J Linke; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Spinal stimulation for movement disorders.

Authors:  Claire Thiriez; Jean-Marc Gurruchaga; Colette Goujon; Gilles Fénelon; Stéphane Palfi
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 8.  Management of persistent postsurgical inguinal pain.

Authors:  Mads U Werner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Flow-metabolism dissociation in the pathogenesis of levodopa-induced dyskinesia.

Authors:  Vincent A Jourdain; Chris C Tang; Florian Holtbernd; Christian Dresel; Yoon Young Choi; Yilong Ma; Vijay Dhawan; David Eidelberg
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-09-22

10.  Deep brain stimulation plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD SURG trial): a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Adrian Williams; Steven Gill; Thelekat Varma; Crispin Jenkinson; Niall Quinn; Rosalind Mitchell; Richard Scott; Natalie Ives; Caroline Rick; Jane Daniels; Smitaa Patel; Keith Wheatley
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.