Literature DB >> 24740734

Results in using the Freiburger monosyllabic speech test in noise without and with hearing aids.

J Löhler1, B Akcicek, B Wollenberg, R Schönweiler, L Verges, Ch Langer, U Machate, R Noppeney, K Schultz, J Kleeberg, B Junge-Hülsing, L E Walther, P Schlattmann, A Ernst.   

Abstract

The Freiburger Speech Test (FST) has been the gold standard in speech testing by word recognition score in Germany for many years. Recently, it has been demonstrated that for an amount of 104 test-persons there is no significant deviation within the lists. The objective of this study was to determine the percentiles of the distinct measuring situations in quiet and with noise (e.g. applied in hearing aid fitting) and the average benefit using hearing aids. In this prospective study, 623 patients with SNHL and equipped with hearing aids for at least 3 months have been investigated by means of the Freiburger monosyllabic test (FBE) without and with hearing aids and in quiet or with noise (CCITT noise, 65/60 dB signal-noise ratio) in free field conditions at 65 dB to determine the ratio of intelligibility. To investigate the different diagnostic conditions a linear mixed model was applied. The dependent binary variable corresponds to the number of understood syllables. The average age of all subjects was about 72.6 years. The average rate of understanding in the FBE without hearing aids and in quiet was 38.5 %, with hearing aids and in quiet 67.7 %, without hearing aids and with noise 22.4 %, and with hearing aids and with noise 39.8 %. All results were presented with the depending confidence intervals. The extent of hearing loss and the quality of hearing aid fitting can be successfully measured using the FST in quiet and with background noise (CCITT noise). In quiet, an average hearing improving gain of 29.2 % points and with noise a gain of 17.4 % points could be estimated with a successful hearing aid fitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24740734     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3039-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  10 in total

1.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.

Authors:  R L Freyman; K S Helfer; D D McCall; R K Clifton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

3.  [Modern speech tests on their way from research into practice : Expectations and reality].

Authors:  J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

5.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; M Wesselkamp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  M A Picheny; N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-03

7.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].

Authors:  C Thiele; H Sukowksi; T Lenarz; A Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.057

9.  [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; M Pilnik; K Saager-Post; S Dazert; S Biedron; J Oeken; D Mürbe; J Löbert; R Laszig; T Wesarg; C Langer; S Plontke; T Rahne; U Machate; R Noppeney; K Schultz; P Plinkert; S Hoth; M Praetorius; P Schlattmann; E F Meister; H W Pau; K Ehrt; R Hagen; W Shehata-Dieler; M Cebulla; L E Walther; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  Clinical measures of auditory function: the cochlea and beyond.

Authors:  Rachael R Baiduc; Gayla L Poling; OiSaeng Hong; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.800

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].

Authors:  T Memmeler; R Schönweiler; B Wollenberg; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].

Authors:  R Thümmler; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].

Authors:  U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Hearing Impairment in Old Age.

Authors:  Jan Löhler; Mario Cebulla; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Stefan Volkenstein; Christiane Völter; Leif Erik Walther
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Variability of word discrimination scores in clinical practice and consequences on their sensitivity to hearing loss.

Authors:  Annie Moulin; André Bernard; Laurent Tordella; Judith Vergne; Annie Gisbert; Christian Martin; Céline Richard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  [Hearing aid fitting: Effect of doubling the standard rate on compliance, quality of results, and excess payments].

Authors:  B Braun; A Dietrich; B Akcicek; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; José L Blanco; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Tobias Balkenhol; Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke; Nicole Rotter; Jérôme J Servais
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].

Authors:  Jan Löhler; Mathias Sippel; Leif Erik Walther; Rainer Schönweiler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.057

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.