Jonathan Grinstein1, Eric Kruse2, Keith Collins2, Gabriel Sayer1, Savitri Fedson3, Gene H Kim1, Nitasha Sarswat1, Sirtaz Adatya1, Takeyoshi Ota4, Valluvan Jeevanandam4, Victor Mor-Avi1, Nir Uriel5, Roberto M Lang1. 1. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 2. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Baylor College of Medicine, Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Houston, TX. 4. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 5. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: nuriel@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is used as a screening tool to evaluate the integrity and mechanics of the pump and circuit. We aimed to 1) establish the normal range and upper reference limit of peak velocity of the outflow cannula for the modern era of LVADs and 2) assess the clinical performance of the currently cited and newly proposed reference limits in patients with continuous-flow LVADs as a screening tool for cannula malfunction. METHODS: LVAD outflow peak CW velocities were measured with the use of Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 57 patients with LVADs (44 with Heartmate II (HM2), 13 with Heartware (HW)). The average velocity and the upper and lower normal reference limits (defined as ±2 standard deviations from the mean) for each LVAD type was calculated. The upper reference limit was then used as a screening threshold for cannula malfunction. RESULTS: The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HM2 cohort was 1.86 ± 0.44 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 2.73 m/s and 0.98 m/s, respectively. The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HW cohort was 2.36 ± 0.53 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 3.42 m/s and 1.3 m/s, respectively, which was significantly higher than the HM2 cohort (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In both HM2 and HW LVADs, the average peak outflow velocity and reference limit for the normal population, as measured by Doppler TTE, was markedly higher than the currently used LVAD reference limits of 2 m/s and are significantly different between devices. Patients with peak outflow velocities above our upper reference limits should be evaluated for LVAD outflow cannula malfunction.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is used as a screening tool to evaluate the integrity and mechanics of the pump and circuit. We aimed to 1) establish the normal range and upper reference limit of peak velocity of the outflow cannula for the modern era of LVADs and 2) assess the clinical performance of the currently cited and newly proposed reference limits in patients with continuous-flow LVADs as a screening tool for cannula malfunction. METHODS:LVAD outflow peak CW velocities were measured with the use of Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 57 patients with LVADs (44 with Heartmate II (HM2), 13 with Heartware (HW)). The average velocity and the upper and lower normal reference limits (defined as ±2 standard deviations from the mean) for each LVAD type was calculated. The upper reference limit was then used as a screening threshold for cannula malfunction. RESULTS: The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HM2 cohort was 1.86 ± 0.44 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 2.73 m/s and 0.98 m/s, respectively. The average outflow cannula peak velocity for the normal HW cohort was 2.36 ± 0.53 m/s with upper and lower reference limits of 3.42 m/s and 1.3 m/s, respectively, which was significantly higher than the HM2 cohort (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In both HM2 and HW LVADs, the average peak outflow velocity and reference limit for the normal population, as measured by Doppler TTE, was markedly higher than the currently used LVAD reference limits of 2 m/s and are significantly different between devices. Patients with peak outflow velocities above our upper reference limits should be evaluated for LVAD outflow cannula malfunction.
Authors: William A Zoghbi; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Elyse Foster; Paul A Grayburn; Carol D Kraft; Robert A Levine; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Catherine M Otto; Miguel A Quinones; Harry Rakowski; William J Stewart; Alan Waggoner; Neil J Weissman Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Biswajit Kar; Reynolds M Delgado; O H Frazier; Igor D Gregoric; Matthew T Harting; Yasmin Wadia; Timothy J Myers; Robert D Moser; Jonathan Freund Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2005
Authors: Steven C Horton; Reza Khodaverdian; Peter Chatelain; Marsha L McIntosh; Benjamin D Horne; Joseph B Muhlestein; James W Long Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-05-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kenneth N Litwak; Steven C Koenig; Hiroyuki Tsukui; Shin'ichiro Kihara; Zhongjun Wu; George M Pantalos Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-09-18
Authors: Christoph Gross; Heinrich Schima; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Kamen Dimitrov; Martin Maw; Julia Riebandt; Dominik Wiedemann; Daniel Zimpfer; Francesco Moscato Journal: Artif Organs Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 3.094