Literature DB >> 27287444

Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions.

Jeffrey Annis1, Brent J Miller2, Thomas J Palmeri2.   

Abstract

When evaluating cognitive models based on fits to observed data (or, really, any model that has free parameters), parameter estimation is critically important. Traditional techniques like hill climbing by minimizing or maximizing a fit statistic often result in point estimates. Bayesian approaches instead estimate parameters as posterior probability distributions, and thus naturally account for the uncertainty associated with parameter estimation; Bayesian approaches also offer powerful and principled methods for model comparison. Although software applications such as WinBUGS (Lunn, Thomas, Best, & Spiegelhalter, Statistics and Computing, 10, 325-337, 2000) and JAGS (Plummer, 2003) provide "turnkey"-style packages for Bayesian inference, they can be inefficient when dealing with models whose parameters are correlated, which is often the case for cognitive models, and they can impose significant technical barriers to adding custom distributions, which is often necessary when implementing cognitive models within a Bayesian framework. A recently developed software package called Stan (Stan Development Team, 2015) can solve both problems, as well as provide a turnkey solution to Bayesian inference. We present a tutorial on how to use Stan and how to add custom distributions to it, with an example using the linear ballistic accumulator model (Brown & Heathcote, Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153-178. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002 , 2008).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Linear ballistic accumulator; Probabilistic programming; Stan

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27287444      PMCID: PMC5149118          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0746-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

Review 1.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Marios G Philiastides; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Extending JAGS: a tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example).

Authors:  Dominik Wabersich; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-03

5.  The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem.

Authors:  Chris Donkin; Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

6.  Informing cognitive abstractions through neuroimaging: the neural drift diffusion model.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Leendert van Maanen; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search.

Authors:  Braden A Purcell; Jeffrey D Schall; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Scott D Brown; Tom Eichele; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tiffany Ho; John Serences; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg; Scott D Brown; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-05-06
  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

2.  An Optimized Bayesian Hierarchical Two-Parameter Logistic Model for Small-Sample Item Calibration.

Authors:  Christoph König; Christian Spoden; Andreas Frey
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-12-21

3.  Memory Reactivation during Learning Simultaneously Promotes Dentate Gyrus/CA2,3 Pattern Differentiation and CA1 Memory Integration.

Authors:  Robert J Molitor; Katherine R Sherrill; Neal W Morton; Alexandra A Miller; Alison R Preston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Exposing Hidden High-Affinity RNA Conformational States.

Authors:  Nicole I Orlovsky; Hashim M Al-Hashimi; Terrence G Oas
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias.

Authors:  Wojciech Zajkowski; Maksymilian Bielecki; Magdalena Marszał-Wiśniewska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  BEXCIS: Bayesian methods for estimating the degree of the skewness of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Yu; Yu Zhang; Meng-Kai Li; Zi-Ying Yang; Wing Kam Fung; Pei-Zhen Zhao; Ji-Yuan Zhou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-28

9.  Transbronchial lung biopsy for the diagnosis of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: the severity of cystic lung destruction assessed by the modified Goddard scoring system as a predictor for establishing the diagnosis.

Authors:  Shouichi Okamoto; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Takuo Hayashi; Keiko Muraki; Tetsutaro Nagaoka; Koichi Nishino; Yasuhito Sekimoto; Shinichi Sasaki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Kuniaki Seyama
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  A Corticothalamic Circuit Trades off Speed for Safety during Decision-Making under Motivational Conflict.

Authors:  Eun A Choi; Medina Husić; E Zayra Millan; Sophia Gilchrist; John M Power; Philip Jean-Richard Dit Bressel; Gavan P McNally
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.709

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.