Literature DB >> 32536732

An Optimized Bayesian Hierarchical Two-Parameter Logistic Model for Small-Sample Item Calibration.

Christoph König1, Christian Spoden2, Andreas Frey1,3.   

Abstract

Accurate item calibration in models of item response theory (IRT) requires rather large samples. For instance, N > 500 respondents are typically recommended for the two-parameter logistic (2PL) model. Hence, this model is considered a large-scale application, and its use in small-sample contexts is limited. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches are frequently proposed to reduce the sample size requirements of the 2PL. This study compared the small-sample performance of an optimized Bayesian hierarchical 2PL (H2PL) model to its standard inverse Wishart specification, its nonhierarchical counterpart, and both unweighted and weighted least squares estimators (ULSMV and WLSMV) in terms of sampling efficiency and accuracy of estimation of the item parameters and their variance components. To alleviate shortcomings of hierarchical models, the optimized H2PL (a) was reparametrized to simplify the sampling process, (b) a strategy was used to separate item parameter covariances and their variance components, and (c) the variance components were given Cauchy and exponential hyperprior distributions. Results show that when combining these elements in the optimized H2PL, accurate item parameter estimates and trait scores are obtained even in sample sizes as small as N = 100 . This indicates that the 2PL can also be applied to smaller sample sizes encountered in practice. The results of this study are discussed in the context of a recently proposed multiple imputation method to account for item calibration error in trait estimation.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; calibration; hierarchical models; item response theory; simulation; small samples

Year:  2019        PMID: 32536732      PMCID: PMC7262992          DOI: 10.1177/0146621619893786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  8 in total

1.  The effect of sample size for estimating Rasch/IRT parameters with dichotomous items.

Authors:  Mark Stone; Futoshi Yumoto
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2004

2.  Sources of Error in IRT Trait Estimation.

Authors:  Leah M Feuerstahler
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-10-06

3.  Estimation of an IRT Model by Mplus for Dichotomously Scored Responses Under Different Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Insu Paek; Mengyao Cui; Neşe Öztürk Gübeş; Yanyun Yang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Characterizing Sources of Uncertainty in IRT Scale Scores.

Authors:  Ji Seung Yang; Mark Hansen; Li Cai
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Brent J Miller; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-06

6.  A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg; Scott D Brown; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-05-06

7.  Bayesian Prior Choice in IRT Estimation Using MCMC and Variational Bayes.

Authors:  Prathiba Natesan; Ratna Nandakumar; Tom Minka; Jonathan D Rubright
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-27

8.  Investigating a Weakly Informative Prior for Item Scale Hyperparameters in Hierarchical 3PNO IRT Models.

Authors:  Yanyan Sheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-06
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Bayesian Hierarchical Multidimensional Item Response Modeling of Small Sample, Sparse Data for Personalized Developmental Surveillance.

Authors:  Patricia Gilholm; Kerrie Mengersen; Helen Thompson
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.088

2.  Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Chloe Thomas; Sophie Whyte; James Chilcott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.558

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.