Literature DB >> 27286728

[Test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].

A Winkler1, I Holube2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ISO 8253-3 describes the requirements for speech tests used in audiology. One aspect is the test-retest reliability, which was here examined for the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test.
METHODS: Speech recognition scores were examined for 30 listeners with normal hearing ability. All 20 lists of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test were tested at four different presentation levels. The retest was carried out 7-9 months later.
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in this study is between 13 percentage points for a speech recognition score of 95 %, and 24 percentage points for a speech recognition score of 39 %. The measurement accuracy can be estimated using binomial distribution.
CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of the results is limited by the small number of test items (20 words) in each list. This does not fulfill the requirements for speech tests in diagnostics and rehabilitation. An improvement of the test-retest reliability can be achieved using several test lists.

Keywords:  Hearing tests; Reliability of results; Speech audiometry; Speech discrimination tests

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27286728     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0166-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  4 in total

1.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.

Authors:  Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

3.  [Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].

Authors:  I Baljić; A Winkler; T Schmidt; I Holube
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.

Authors:  A R Thornton; M J Raffin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  [The adaptive Freiburg monosyllabic test in noise : Development of a procedure and comparison of the results with the Oldenburg sentence test].

Authors:  T Memmeler; R Schönweiler; B Wollenberg; J Löhler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].

Authors:  I Baljić; A Winkler; T Schmidt; I Holube
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

4.  [Characterization of a closed-set logatome test : Documentation of audiometric data: discrimination function and reproducibility].

Authors:  L Hörmann; P Ambrosch; M Hey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [The Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in noise].

Authors:  A Winkler; I Holube; H Husstedt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels.

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients : Implications for adequate test levels. German version].

Authors:  M Hey; T Hocke; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Piotr H Skarzynski; Anna Ratuszniak; Kamila Osinska; Magdalena Koziel; Bartlomiej Krol; Katarzyna B Cywka; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  [Effectiveness of hearing aid provision for severe hearing loss].

Authors:  Max Engler; Frank Digeser; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.330

10.  [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].

Authors:  Jan Löhler; Mathias Sippel; Leif Erik Walther; Rainer Schönweiler
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.057

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.