Literature DB >> 31690970

[Characterization of a closed-set logatome test : Documentation of audiometric data: discrimination function and reproducibility].

L Hörmann1, P Ambrosch2, M Hey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Logatomes, nonsensical combinations of consonants and vowels, are suitable for a precise capture and analysis of individual phonemes as fundamental modules of speech in audiometric diagnostics.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to capture the audiometric characteristics of a closed-set logatome test. The slope of the discrimination function at the speech reception threshold (SRT) and the reproducibility were analyzed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A set of 102 intensity varied and randomized logatomes were presented in the form of consonant-vowel-consonant to 25 hearing unimpaired adults. The measurements were performed in a free field setting and were each repeated after a 2-week interval. The subjects were requested to repeat the heard logatome in a closed response test of 10 items per sound item on a touchscreen.
RESULTS: The slope of the mean discrimination function at the SRT was on average 4%/dB; however, the mean discrimination function slope was steeper for the initial consonant than for the final one. The differences of the test and retest results at the SRT showed a standard deviation of 13% for consonants. These differences were normally distributed. There were no significant differences between test and retest.
CONCLUSION: The slope of the discrimination function at the SRT appeared to be shallow but was comparable to established word tests. Finally, there was no evidence of a learning effect in the retest, which emphasizes the low redundancy of the speech material and makes it an attractive complementary option to routine audiometric diagnostics.

Keywords:  Logatome; Speech audiometry; Speech discrimination tests; Speech reception threshold; Test-retest reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31690970     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00771-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  17 in total

1.  [Modern procedures in speech audiometry].

Authors:  J Kiessling
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise.

Authors:  José R Benkí
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

4.  [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Speech audiometry with logatomes].

Authors:  A Welge-Lüssen; R Hauser; J Erdmann; C Schwob; R Probst
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.057

6.  Prediction of consonant recognition in quiet for listeners with normal and impaired hearing using an auditory model.

Authors:  Tim Jürgens; Stephan D Ewert; Birger Kollmeier; Thomas Brand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  [Experience with Jakobi's logatom test. Recommendations for international speech audiometry].

Authors:  H Jakobi; R Ackermann
Journal:  Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)       Date:  1982-04

9.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.

Authors:  A R Thornton; M J Raffin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

10.  [Experiences in Kiel with the cochlear implant].

Authors:  J Müller-Deile; B J Schmidt; H Rudert
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.