Literature DB >> 27284471

Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy.

Khaldoun Almhanna1, Jill Weber1, Ravi Shridhar1, Sarah Hoffe1, Jonathan Strosberg1, Kenneth Meredith1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the impact of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed during esophagectomy on outcomes in esophageal cancer (EC).
METHODS: From a comprehensive EC database we identified patients who underwent curative resection from 1994 to 2011. The impact of total LNs retrieved on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated.
RESULTS: In total, 635 patients were identified. Patients were divided on the basis of total number of LNs removed (<8, 9-12, 13-20, and >20). The 5-year OS and DFS rates for the group by LN category were (43%, 42%, 55%, and 36%, P=0.1836) and (44%, 37%, 46%, and 36%, P=0.5166), respectively. Total number of LNs assessed did not correlate with reduced risk of recurrence or improved survival. On multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, histology, neoadjuvant therapy, only removal of 13-20 LN's correlated to improved oncologic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary cancer center, we demonstrated that only removal of 13-20 LNs during esophagectomy correlated to improved survival. While the importance of standardized pathologic examination and adequate nodal staging is of utmost importance for patients with EC undergoing esophagectomy the optimum number of LNs removed clearly warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; lymph nodes (LN); neoadjuvant therapy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27284471      PMCID: PMC4880760          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2015.12.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  20 in total

1.  Significance of extended systemic lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma in Japan.

Authors:  H Watanabe; H Kato; Y Tachimori
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2000

2.  Prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield of extended en bloc resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardia.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J W Van Sandick; G J Offerhaus; H W Tilanus; H Obertop; J J Van Lanschot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The total number of resected lymph node is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Bing-Yen Wang; Teh-Ying Chou; Chien-Sheng Huang; Yu-Chung Wu; Wen-Hu Hsu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Lymph node dissection impact on staging and survival of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, based on U.S. population data.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Prognostic factors after oesophagectomy and extended lymphadenectomy for squamous oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; N Takada; K Hirohashi; H Kinoshita; M Higashino
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Alexander J Greenstein; Virginia R Litle; Scott J Swanson; Celia M Divino; Stuart Packer; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas W Rice; Long-Qi Chen; Paul H Schipper; Kenneth A Kesler; Simon Law; Toni E M R Lerut; Carolyn E Reed; Jarmo A Salo; Walter J Scott; Wayne L Hofstetter; Thomas J Watson; Mark S Allen; Valerie W Rusch; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH POOR QUALITY LYMPHADENECTOMY.

Authors:  Flávio Roberto Takeda; Francisco Tustumi; Bruna de Camargo Nigro; Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum; Ulysses Ribeiro-Junior; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2019-12-20

2.  Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes dissection in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Jingpu Wang; Yang Yang; Mohammed Shafiulla Shaik
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.