Literature DB >> 31859928

TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH POOR QUALITY LYMPHADENECTOMY.

Flávio Roberto Takeda1, Francisco Tustumi1, Bruna de Camargo Nigro1, Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum1, Ulysses Ribeiro-Junior1, Ivan Cecconello1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery increases the likelihood of treatment success. AIM: To evaluate variables that can influence the number of retrieved lymph nodes, the number of retrieved metastatic lymph nodes and lymphnodal recurrence in esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: Patients of a single institute were evaluated after completion of trimodal therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate variables that can influence in the number of retrieved lymph nodes and retrieved metastatic lymph nodes.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine patients were included. Thoracoscopy access was considered an independent factor for the number of lymph nodes retrieved, but was neither related to the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved nor to lymphnodal recurrence. Pathological complete response on the primary tumor and male were independent variables associated with the number of positive lymph node retrieved. Pathological complete response on the primary tumor site did not statistically influence the likelihood of a lower number of lymph nodes retrieved.
CONCLUSION: Patients submitted to esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, thoracoscopic access is more accurate for pathological staging, even in a complete pathological response. With a proper patient selection, transhiatal surgery may preserve the quality of lymphadenectomy of the positive lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31859928      PMCID: PMC6918728          DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig        ISSN: 0102-6720


INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer is a growing health issue expected to increase in incidence over the next years due to the upsurge of gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity , . It is still a challenging disease with a poor prognosis despite the advances in chemoradiotherapy and all the progress made in the last years in minimally invasive surgery and postoperative management . The prognosis of this aggressive neoplasm depends mainly on the local invasion extension, hematogenous metastasis, and lymphatic spread . Surgical resection is the primary treatment for localized esophageal carcinoma, and a properly lymphadenectomy is crucial for long-term survival . Both the number of lymph nodes retrieved during esophagectomy and the metastatic lymph correlated with survival rates , . Also, lymph node status is crucial for neoplasm staging and, thus, for establishing prognosis and treatment strategies , , . On the other hand, good quality lymphadenectomy may be challenging after chemoradiation, once it leads to the formation of fibrosis inside the radiation field , , . Also, systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy may modify the number and the distribution of mediastinal lymph nodes and also affect metastatic lymph nodes . At the same time, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is the standard treatment for most localized esophageal neoplasms, once it can improve long-term survival by controlling of locoregional disease, tumor downstaging before surgery, and targeting micrometastases, decreasing the risk of distant metastasis , . This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the variables that can influence the quality of lymphadenectomy in esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using platinum- and taxane-based regimen. For lymphadenectomy quality assessment, this study evaluated the number of lymph nodes retrieved (LNr), the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (PLNr), and lymphnodal recurrence rate.

METHODS

This study was approved by institutional ethics committee with number 3.315.331

Study design

This is a retrospective cohort in which patients of a single institute with completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using platinum- and taxane-based regimens, followed by curative intent esophagectomy, were selected. Radiation dose ranged from 41.4 to 50.4 cGy. A transthoracic approach with two-field lymph-node dissection was performed for tumors extending proximally to the tracheal bifurcation. A transhiatal resection was preferred for tumors involving the esophagogastric junction. Patients were recruited from 2009 to 2019, and were staged with endoscopy, CT-scan, and PET-Scan before neoadjuvant therapy and classified according to the 8th edition of UICC staging . Patients were followed with clinical exams, endoscopies, and CT-scans. The endpoints evaluated were the number of lymph nodes retrieved (LNr), the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (PLNr), and lymphnodal recurrence rate.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square test or likelihood-ratio test were used for each outcome for absolute and relative variables. Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests were used to assess for significant differences on a continuous dependent variable by a categorical independent variable. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for the outcomes. Only variables that were significant on univariate analysis were included as covariates in the multivariable analyses. Data were assessed with IBM-SPSS software version 20.0, and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted.

RESULTS

Were enrolled 149 consecutive patients between 2009 and 2019 that have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using platinum- and taxane-based regimen followed by curative intent esophagectomy. The mean age was 61.5 years (SD±8.1), with male predominance (76%). There were 101 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 48 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. The mean follow-up was 31.3 months (SD±22). The median number of lymph nodes retrieved (LNr) was 19. Patients were grouped as up to 19 and more than 19 LN for univariate analysis (Table 1). Surgical access (p<0.001) and age (p=0.003) influenced the number of LNr in esophagectomy. Pathological complete response (pCR) on the primary tumor site did not statistically influence the likelihood of a lower number of LNr (OR 0.81; 95%CI: 0.41-1.56; p=0.536). When analyzing each surgical access separately (transhiatal or thoracoscopy), pCR was still not statistically associated with the number of LNr (Table 2). In multiple regression analysis, only thoracoscopy access was considered an independent factor (OR 6.4; 95%CI: 2.18-18.75; p=0.001).
TABLE 1

Univariate analysis for number of lymph node retrieved

VariableLymph node retrieved ORCI (95%) p
≤19 (n=76)>19 (n=73)LowerUpper
Gender, n (%)     0.807
Male57 (50.4)56 (49.6)1.00   
Female19 (52.8)17 (47.2)0.910.431.93 
Histology, n (%)     0.856
SCC51 (50.5)50 (49.5)1.00   
Adenocarcinoma25 (52.1)23 (47.9)0.940.471.87 
Surgical access, n (%)     <0.001
Transhiatal27 (84.4)5 (15.6)1.00   
Thoracoscopy49 (41.9)68 (58.1)7.492.7020.83 
cStage, n (%)     0.174
I/II23 (60.5)15 (39.5)1.00   
III/IV53 (47.7)58 (52.3)1.680.793.55 
Grade of cellular differentiation, n (%)     0.370
Well9 (69.2)4 (30.8)1.00   
Moderately47 (48.5)50 (51.5)2.390.698.30 
Poorly18 (50)18 (50)2.250.598.65 
pCR, n (%)     0.536
No42 (48.8)44 (51.2)1.00   
Yes34 (54)29 (46)0.810.411.56 
Age (years)     0.003**
median (min; max)63 (42;79)60 (37;76)0.9410.9040.981 
Interval CRT-surgery (days)     0.169**
median (min; max)96 (38;288)94 (31;293)0.9950.9871.002 

Chi-squared test **Mann-Whitney

TABLE 2

There was no association of lymph node retrieved and pathological complete response (pCR)

 Lymph node retrieved Total p
Thoracoscopy  ≤19 >19  
pCR (%)No26 (39.4)40 (60.6)660.535
Yes23 (45.1)28 (54.9)51
Total (%) 49 (41.9)68 (58.1)117 
Transhiatal  ≤19 >19  
pCR (%)No16 (80)4 (20)200.626
Yes11 (91.7)1 (8.3)12
Total (%) 27 (84.4)5 (15.6)32 

Fisher’s exact test Fisher’s exact test

Chi-squared test **Mann-Whitney Fisher’s exact test Fisher’s exact test The number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (PLNr) was associated with gender (p=0.044), adenocarcinoma histology (p<0.001), and pCR on the primary tumor site (p<0.001) on univariate analysis (Table 3). In the multiple regression analysis, pCR on the primary tumor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.04-0.25; p<0.001) and gender (male patients were more likely to have PLNr than women (OR 2.69; 95%CI: 1.03-7.04; p=0.044) were independent variables associated with the number of PLNr. Surgical access was not related to PLNr.
TABLE 3

Univariate analysis for metastatic lymph nodes

VariableMetastatic lymph node (%) ORCI (95%) p
No (n=86)Yes (n=63)LowerUpper
Gender, n (%)     0.044
Male67 (59.3)46 (40.7)1.00   
Female28 (77.8)8 (22.2)0.420.170.99 
Histology, n (%)     <0.001
SCC74 (73.3)27 (26.7)1.00   
Adenocarcinoma21 (43.8)27 (56.3)3.521.717.24 
Surgical access, n (%)     0.867
Transhiatal20 (62.5)12 (37.5)1.00   
Thoracoscopy75 (64.1)42 (35.9)0.930.422.10 
cStage, n (%)     0.140
I/II28 (73.7)10 (26.3)1.00   
III/IV67 (60.4)44 (39.6)1.840.814.16 
Grade of cellular differentiation, n (%)     0.323#
Well8 (61.5)5 (38.5)1.00   
Moderately65 (67)32 (33)0.790.242.60 
Poorly19 (52.8)17 (47.2)1.430.395.23 
pCR, n (%)     <0.001
No39 (45.3)47 (54.7)1.00   
Yes56 (88.9)7 (11.1)0.100.040.25 
Age (years)     0.298**
median (min; max)63 (41;79)61 (37;78)0.9790.9411.018 
Interval CRT-surgery (days)     0.912**
median (min; max)94 (36;293)98 (31;244)0.9990.9911.006 

Chi-squared test **Mann-Whitney test

Chi-squared test **Mann-Whitney test Concerning lymphnodal recurrence, only pCR of the primary tumor was statistically significant (OR: 0.327; 95%CI: 0.08-0.99; p=0.038, Table 4). The surgical access was not related to lymphnodal recurrence.
TABLE 4

Univariate analysis for lymph nodal recurrence

VariableLymph nodal recurrence HRCI 95% p
No (n=126)Yes (n=23)LowerUpper
Gender, n (%)      
Male97 (85.8)16 (14.2)1,00   
Female29 (80.6)7 (19.4)1.320.5543.150.53
Histology, n (%)      
Adenocarcinoma41 (85.4)7 (14.6)1,00   
SCC85 (84.2)16 (15.8)1.010.4182.450.98
Surgical access, n (%)      
Transhiatal30 (93.8)2 (6.3)1,00   
Thoracoscopy96 (82.1)21 (17.9)2.910.68112.40.15
cStage, n (%)      
I/II32 (84.2)6 (15.8)1,00   
III/IV94 (84.7)17 (15.3)0.9810.3892.470.97
pCR58 (92)5 (8)0.3270.080. 990.038
Grade of cellular differentiation, n (%)     
I10 (76.9)3 (23.1)1,00   
II82 (84.5)15 (15.5)0.8630.3682.020.73
III31 (86.1)5 (13.9)0.9450.3512.540.91
Age (yr)  0.9650.9211.010.13
Mean±SD61.4±8.658.6±8.4    
Median (min; max)62.5 (41; 79)60 (37; 71)    
Interval CRT-Surgery (days) 1,000.9961.010.49
Mean±SD102.1±47.9111.1±36.5    
Median (min; max)94 (31; 293)98 (59; 177)    

Chi-squared test

Chi-squared test

DISCUSSION

This cohort comprising 149 patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using platinum- and taxane-based regimen followed by curative intent esophagectomy showed that thoracoscopy access was more likely to achieve lymph node retrieval than transhiatal access. On the other hand, surgical access did not differ in the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved, and also did not influence the risk for lymphnodal recurrence. The transthoracic access provides a better pathological staging since it showed a higher number of LNr. However, the number of LNr is not the same for the good quality lymphadenectomy. In fact, with proper patient selection, transhiatal access with infracarinal lymphadenectomy may be enough to retrieve the nodal stations with a higher risk for positivity, avoiding lymphnodal recurrence. In this scenario, transhiatal approach turns to be a good option, since it is associated with reduced perioperative morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and decreased in-hospital mortality rates , , mainly in the cases of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy . Neither complete pathological response nor histological type was associated with the number of retrieved lymph nodes. Therefore, the number of LNr should be taken into consideration as one of the parameters when monitoring the quality of esophagectomy for cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, regardless of pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy or histological type. This finding differs from rectal cancer, in which pCR after chemoradiotherapy is associated with a lower number of lymph nodes harvested . Squamous cell carcinoma showed a higher likelihood of a lower number of positive lymph nodes retrieved, but this is probably due to the higher response to neoadjuvant therapy. Gender was associated with a higher likelihood of PLNr. While the mechanism underlying the association of lymph nodes metastasis and gender, epidemiological studies have reported a potential association between gender hormones and certain neoplasms, such as colorectal and thyroid cancers , . This study has several limitations. It was a retrospective, nonrandomized, single-institution; the number of patients, especially with adenocarcinoma, was relatively small; and different neoadjuvant chemotherapy other than platinum- and taxane-based regimen, were not evaluated. Further studies with large controlled trials, comparing transhiatal and transthoracic access patients are required.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic access is more accurate for pathological staging in patients submitted to esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using platinum- and taxane-based regimen, even for a complete pathological response. With proper selection, transhiatal surgery may preserve the quality of lymph node excision of the positive lymph nodes.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for distal esophageal cancer: which is superior?

Authors:  Hugh Colvin; Joel Dunning; Omar A Khan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 2.  The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized.

Authors:  Eliza R C Hagens; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Miguel A Cuesta; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shmuel Avital; Natan Zundel; Samuel Szomstein; Raul Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Determining the optimal number of lymph nodes harvested during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Khaldoun Almhanna; Jill Weber; Ravi Shridhar; Sarah Hoffe; Jonathan Strosberg; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

Review 5.  Esophageal cancer: A Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Kyle J Napier; Mary Scheerer; Subhasis Misra
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

6.  Pathologic lymph node ratio is a predictor of esophageal carcinoma patient survival: a literature-based pooled analysis.

Authors:  Yuming Zhao; Shengyi Zhong; Zhenhua Li; Xiaofeng Zhu; Feima Wu; Yanxing Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-15

Review 7.  CURRENT STATUS OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TREATMENT OF GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA.

Authors:  Marcelo Garcia Toneto; Luciana Viola
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-07-02

8.  EARLY ORAL FEEDING POST-UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT RESECTION AND PRIMARY ANASTOMOSIS IN ONCOLOGY.

Authors:  Lilian Pinheiro Lopes; Taysa Machado Menezes; Diogo Oliveira Toledo; Antônio Talvane Torres DE-Oliveira; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; José Eduardo de Aguilar Nascimento
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2018-06-21

9.  PRE AND POSTOPERATIVE PH MONITORING AND WEIGHT LOSS ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING GASTRIC PLICATION IN ASSOCIATION WITH FUNDOPLICATION.

Authors:  Flávio Heuta Ivano; Luciana Pereira Mesquita; Cristiane Megumi Simamura; Gustavo Massaki Kuwaki; Julielli Taques Colman; Guilherme Mussi Campos
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Tomonari Suetsugu; Takeharu Imai; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Kazuya Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-05-28
View more
  3 in total

1.  TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY IN SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS: WHAT ARE THE BEST INDICATIONS?

Authors:  Felipe Monge Vieira; Marcio Fernandes Chedid; Richard Ricachenevsky Gurski; Carlos Cauduro Schirmer; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Ricardo Vitiello Schramm; André Ricardo Pereira Rosa; Cleber Dario Pinto Kruel
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY TRANSHITAL ESOPHAGECTOMY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: IMPACT OF PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE.

Authors:  Iuri Pedreira Fillardi Alves; Valdir Tercioti Junior; João de Souza Coelho Neto; José Antonio Possatto Ferrer; José Barreto Campello Carvalheira; Eduardo Baldon Pereira; Luiz Roberto Lopes; Nelson Adami Andreollo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  PROF. PHD. HENRIQUE WALTER PINOTTI: 1929 - 2010. FOUNDER OF THE BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY.

Authors:  Ivan Cecconello; Marco Aurélio Santo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.