Literature DB >> 17390167

Lymph node dissection impact on staging and survival of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, based on U.S. population data.

Roderich E Schwarz1, David D Smith.   

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) frequently demonstrate lymphatic spread. We investigated lymph node (LN) counts after resection of extrahepatic CC and survival based on the SEER 1973-2004 database. Out of 20,068 CC patients, 1,518 individuals were selected based on M0 stage and at least one LN examined. Primary cancer sites included gallbladder (29%), extrahepatic bile ducts (26%), and intrapancreatic/ampullary bile ducts (45%); 42% of patients were LN-positive. The median number of LNs examined was four (range 1-39). Median survival was 37 months for LN-negative and 16 months for LN-positive cancers. Multivariate prognostic variables were the number of positive LNs, primary site, age (all at p < 0.0001), gender (p = 0.002), size (p = 0.005), T category (p = 0.009), and total LN count (or number of negative LNs obtained, p = 0.01). The impact of total LN counts was seen in LN-negative (median survival, 1 vs 10 or more LNs examined: 27 vs 51 months, p = 0.002) and LN-positive disease (10 vs 22 months, p < 0.0001). Survival prediction of extrahepatic CCs is strongly influenced by total LN counts and numbers of negative LNs obtained. Although the resulting incremental benefit is small, dissection and examination of 10 or more LNs should be considered for curative intent resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17390167     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-006-0018-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas?

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Conservatism of the approximation sigma (O-E)2-E in the logrank test for survival data or tumor incidence data.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection.

Authors:  Y Kitagawa; M Nagino; J Kamiya; K Uesaka; T Sano; H Yamamoto; N Hayakawa; Y Nimura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in radical surgery for advanced gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  S Kondo; Y Nimura; N Hayakawa; J Kamiya; M Nagino; K Uesaka
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Takanori Yoshida; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Atsushi Sasaki; Yuji Morii; Masanori Aramaki; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-01

6.  Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection.

Authors:  Jin-Young Jang; Sun-Whe Kim; Do Joong Park; Young Joon Ahn; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Min Gew Choi; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kuhn Uk Lee; Yong-Hyun Park
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

Authors:  S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinomas: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Suayib Yalcin
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

9.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality.

Authors:  Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  21 in total

1.  The impact of tumor extent (T stage) and lymph node involvement (N stage) on survival after surgical resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Victor Zaydfudim; Irene D Feurer; J Kelly Wright; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Lymphadenectomy in the staging and treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study using the National Cancer Institute SEER database.

Authors:  Clancy J Clark; Christina M Wood-Wentz; Kaye M Reid-Lombardo; Michael L Kendrick; Marianne Huebner; Florencia G Que
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio after resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Tommaso Campagnaro; Silvia Pachera; Simone Conci; Alessandro Valdegamberi; Marco Sandri; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Lymph nodal involvement as prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer: location, count or ratio?

Authors:  Sanjay Singh Negi; Amanjeet Singh; Adarsh Chaudhary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Patterns and prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for surgical treatment of perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Tommaso Campagnaro; Alessandro Valdegamberi; Fabio Bagante; Francesca Bertuzzo; Simone Conci; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Assessment of nodal status for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma location, number, or ratio of involved nodes.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Francesca Bertuzzo; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kai Mao; Jieqiong Liu; Jian Sun; Jianlong Zhang; Jie Chen; Timothy M Pawlik; Lisa K Jacobs; Zhiyu Xiao; Jie Wang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Radical lymph node dissection and assessment: Impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Gui-Jie Liu; Xue-Hua Li; Yan-Xin Chen; Hui-Dong Sun; Gui-Mei Zhao; San-Yuan Hu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without pyloric preservation: a clinical outcomes comparison.

Authors:  Sean P Dineen; Christina L Roland; Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2009-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.