Literature DB >> 27281747

Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.

Neil M Drummond1, Erin K Cressman1, Anthony N Carlsen2.   

Abstract

In a stop-signal task participants are instructed to initiate a movement in response to a go signal, but to inhibit this movement if an infrequent stop signal is presented after the go. Reaction time (RT) in a stop-signal task is typically longer compared with that in a simple RT task, which may be attributed to a reduced readiness to initiate the response caused by the possibility of having to inhibit the response. The purpose of this experiment was to probe the preparatory activation level of the motor response during a stop-signal task using a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS), which has been shown to involuntarily trigger sufficiently prepared responses at a short latency. Participants completed two separate tasks: a simple RT task, followed by a stop-signal RT task. During both tasks, an SAS (120 dB) was pseudorandomly presented concurrently with the go signal. As expected, RT during the simple RT task was significantly shorter than during the stop-signal task. A significant reduction in RT was noted when an SAS was presented during the simple RT task; however, during the stop-signal task, an SAS resulted in either a significant speeding or a moderate delay in RT. Additionally, the subset of SAS trial responses with the shortest RT latencies produced during the stop-signal task were also delayed compared with the short-latency SAS trial responses observed during the simple RT task. Despite evidence that a response was prepared in advance of the go signal during a stop-signal task, it appears that the amount of preparatory activation was reduced compared with that achieved during a simple RT task.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inhibition; preparation; reaction time; startling acoustic stimulus; stop-signal task

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27281747      PMCID: PMC5009214          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00216.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

Authors:  A J T Stevenson; C Chiu; D Maslovat; R Chua; B Gick; J-S Blouin; I M Franks
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Reda Badry; Tatsuya Mima; Toshihiko Aso; Masahiro Nakatsuka; Mitsunari Abe; Dina Fathi; Nageh Foly; Hamdy Nagiub; Takashi Nagamine; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  H Leuthold; W Sommer; R Ulrich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-09

Review 5.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The predictive value for performance speed of preparatory changes in neuronal activity of the monkey motor and premotor cortex.

Authors:  A Riehle; J Requin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-02-26       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  StartReact restores reaction time in HSP: evidence for subcortical release of a motor program.

Authors:  Jorik Nonnekes; Lars B Oude Nijhuis; Mark de Niet; Susanne T de Bot; Jacobus W Pasman; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Bastiaan R Bloem; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Alexander C Geurts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A proactive mechanism for selective suppression of response tendencies.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Repeated testing of prepulse inhibition and habituation of the startle reflex: a study in healthy human controls.

Authors:  K Abel; M Waikar; B Pedro; D Hemsley; M Geyer
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.153

View more
  1 in total

1.  Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.