Literature DB >> 21508221

A proactive mechanism for selective suppression of response tendencies.

Weidong Cai1, Caitlin L Oldenkamp, Adam R Aron.   

Abstract

While most research on stopping action examines how an initiated response is stopped when a signal occurs (i.e., reactively), everyday life also calls for a mechanism to prepare to stop a particular response tendency (i.e., proactively and selectively). We hypothesized that human subjects can prepare to stop a particular response by proactively suppressing that response representation in the brain. We tested this by using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and concurrent electromyography. This allowed us to interrogate the corticomotor excitability of specific response representations even before action ensued. We found that the motor evoked potential of the effector that might need to be stopped in the future was significantly reduced compared with when that effector was at rest. Further, this neural index of proactive and selective suppression predicted the subsequent selectivity with which the behavioral response was stopped. These results go further than earlier reports of reduced motor excitability when responses are stopped. They show that the control can be applied in advance (proactively) and also targeted at a particular response channel (selectively). This provides novel evidence for an active mechanism of suppression in the brain that is setup according to the subject's goals and even before action ensues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508221      PMCID: PMC3111595          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6292-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  21 in total

1.  Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity.

Authors:  Y Prut; E E Fetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effect of volitional inhibition on cortical inhibitory mechanisms.

Authors:  Young H Sohn; Katy Wiltz; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions.

Authors:  G E Alexander; M D Crutcher; M R DeLong
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Neural mechanisms of attention and control: losing our inhibitions?

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Selective inhibition of movement.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Temporal changes of pyramidal tract activities after decision of movement: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in humans.

Authors:  M Hoshiyama; R Kakigi; S Koyama; Y Takeshima; S Watanabe; M Shimojo
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08

Review 8.  The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: contributions of human brain lesion studies.

Authors:  N G Müller; R T Knight
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 10.  The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs.

Authors:  J W Mink
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.685

View more
  53 in total

1.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Expectations and violations: delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control.

Authors:  Bram B Zandbelt; Mirjam Bloemendaal; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; René S Kahn; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Stopping a response has global or nonglobal effects on the motor system depending on preparation.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals dissociable mechanisms for global versus selective corticomotor suppression underlying the stopping of action.

Authors:  D S Adnan Majid; Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  A unified framework for inhibitory control.

Authors:  Yuko Munakata; Seth A Herd; Christopher H Chatham; Brendan E Depue; Marie T Banich; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The Organization of Right Prefrontal Networks Reveals Common Mechanisms of Inhibitory Regulation Across Cognitive, Emotional, and Motor Processes.

Authors:  B E Depue; J M Orr; H R Smolker; F Naaz; M T Banich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Individual Differences in Resting Corticospinal Excitability Are Correlated with Reaction Time and GABA Content in Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Maedbh King; Sean Noah; Richard J Maddock; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Berry van den Berg; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-02-01

10.  Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.