Literature DB >> 24680855

Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

A J T Stevenson1, C Chiu2, D Maslovat3, R Chua4, B Gick5, J-S Blouin6, I M Franks4.   

Abstract

The rapid release of prepared movements by a loud acoustic stimulus capable of eliciting a startle response has been termed the StartReact effect (Valls-Solé et al., 1999), and premotor reaction times (PMTs) of <70 ms are often observed. Two explanations have been given for these short latency responses. The subcortical storage and triggering hypothesis suggests movements that can be prepared in advance of a "go" signal are stored and triggered from subcortical areas by a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) without cortical involvement. Alternatively, it has been hypothesized that the SAS can trigger movements from cortical areas through a faster pathway ascending from subcortical structures. Two experiments were designed to examine the possible role of the primary motor cortex in the StartReact effect. In Experiment 1, we used suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during the reaction time (RT) interval to induce a cortical silent period in the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1). Thirteen participants performed 20° wrist extension movements as fast as possible in response to either a control stimulus (82 dB) or SAS (124 dB). PMTs for startle trials were faster than for control trials, while TMS significantly delayed movement onset compared to No TMS or Sham TMS conditions. In Experiment 2, we examined the StartReact effect in a highly cortically represented action involving speech of a consonant-vowel (CV) syllable. Similar to previous work examining limb movements, a robust StartReact effect was found. Collectively, these experiments provide evidence for cortical (M1) involvement in the StartReact effect.
Copyright © 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  StartReact; motor cortex; motor preparation; speech; startle; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24680855      PMCID: PMC4063318          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  55 in total

1.  Hemispheric lateralization in the cortical motor preparation for human vocalization.

Authors:  Y Terao; Y Ugawa; H Enomoto; T Furubayashi; Y Shiio; K Machii; R Hanajima; M Nishikawa; N K Iwata; Y Saito; I Kanazawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Two different effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the human motor cortex during the pre-movement period.

Authors:  Toshihiro Hashimoto; Daisuke Inaba; Michikazu Matsumura; Eiichi Naito
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 3.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Mechanisms of motor-evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  StartReact restores reaction time in HSP: evidence for subcortical release of a motor program.

Authors:  Jorik Nonnekes; Lars B Oude Nijhuis; Mark de Niet; Susanne T de Bot; Jacobus W Pasman; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Bastiaan R Bloem; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Alexander C Geurts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jason A Smith; Mark Mennemeier; Twyla Bartel; Kenneth C Chelette; Timothy Kimbrell; William Triggs; John L Dornhoffer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Using a startling acoustic stimulus to investigate underlying mechanisms of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Quincy J Almeida; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  The effects of startle and non-startle auditory stimuli on wrist flexion movement in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo; Olalla Bello; Virginia Lopez-Alonso; G Marquez; Jose A Sanchez; Luis Morenilla; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  14 in total

1.  Pitch planning in English and Taiwanese Mandarin: evidence from startle-elicited responses.

Authors:  Chenhao Chiu; Bryan Gick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The early release of actions by loud sounds in muscles with distinct connectivity.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Kimberly Bennett; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Nonspeech Oral Movements and Oral Motor Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ray D Kent
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  High-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals differential cortical contributions to prepared responses.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Dana Maslovat; Neil M Drummond; Joëlle Hajj; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Time-interval for integration of stabilizing haptic and visual information in subjects balancing under static and dynamic conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06

Review 9.  Interactions between stretch and startle reflexes produce task-appropriate rapid postural reactions.

Authors:  Jonathan Shemmell
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28

10.  Startling speech: eliciting prepared speech using startling auditory stimulus.

Authors:  Chenhao Chiu; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.