Literature DB >> 27281744

Proactive modulation of long-interval intracortical inhibition during response inhibition.

Matthew J Cowie1, Hayley J MacDonald1, John Cirillo1, Winston D Byblow2.   

Abstract

Daily activities often require sudden cancellation of preplanned movement, termed response inhibition. When only a subcomponent of a whole response must be suppressed (required here on Partial trials), the ensuing component is markedly delayed. The neural mechanisms underlying partial response inhibition remain unclear. We hypothesized that Partial trials would be associated with nonselective corticomotor suppression and that GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition within primary motor cortex might be responsible for the nonselective corticomotor suppression contributing to Partial trial response delays. Sixteen right-handed participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition task while single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to elicit motor evoked potentials in the left first dorsal interosseous muscle. Lift times, amplitude of motor evoked potentials, and long-interval intracortical inhibition were examined across the different trial types (Go, Stop-Left, Stop-Right, Stop-Both). Go trials produced a tight distribution of lift times around the target, whereas those during Partial trials (Stop-Left and Stop-Right) were substantially delayed. The modulation of motor evoked potential amplitude during Stop-Right trials reflected anticipation, suppression, and subsequent reinitiation of movement. Importantly, suppression was present across all Stop trial types, indicative of a "default" nonselective inhibitory process. Compared with blocks containing only Go trials, inhibition increased when Stop trials were introduced but did not differ between trial types. The amount of inhibition was positively correlated with lift times during Stop-Right trials. Tonic levels of inhibition appear to be proactively modulated by task context and influence the speed at which unimanual responses occur after a nonselective "brake" is applied.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intracortical inhibition; motor cortex; paired pulse; response inhibition; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27281744      PMCID: PMC4995280          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00144.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Stop and go: the neural basis of selective movement prevention.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli in resting, active, and recently activated muscles.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; A Samii; B Mercuri; K Ikoma; D Oddo; S E Grill; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI reveal cortical and subcortical interactions during stop-signal response inhibition.

Authors:  Bram B Zandbelt; Mirjam Bloemendaal; Janna Marie Hoogendam; René S Kahn; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Edinburgh Handedness Inventory - Short Form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Jaimie F Veale
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2013-05-10

7.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A proactive mechanism for selective suppression of response tendencies.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Uncoupling response inhibition.

Authors:  Hayley J Macdonald; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Mark G Stokes; Tracy R Henderson; Hugh Garavan; Ian H Robertson; Adam P Morris; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict motor-inhibitory performance.

Authors:  Jason L He; I Fuelscher; J Coxon; N Chowdhury; Wei-Peng Teo; P Barhoun; P Enticott; C Hyde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task.

Authors:  Alison Hall; Ned Jenkinson; Hayley J MacDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 3.  Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Authors:  Corey G Wadsley; John Cirillo; Arne Nieuwenhuys; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  A Single Mechanism for Global and Selective Response Inhibition under the Influence of Motor Preparation.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; René J Huster; Richard B Ivry; Ludovica Labruna; Mari S Messel; Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Paired-pulse TMS and scalp EEG reveal systematic relationship between inhibitory GABAa signaling in M1 and fronto-central cortical activity during action stopping.

Authors:  Megan Hynd; Cheol Soh; Benjamin O Rangel; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Interhemispheric Cortical Inhibition Is Reduced in Young Adults With Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  Jason L He; Ian Fuelscher; Peter G Enticott; Wei-Peng Teo; Pamela Barhoun; Christian Hyde
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Age-related alterations in the modulation of intracortical inhibition during stopping of actions.

Authors:  Lize Hermans; Celine Maes; Lisa Pauwels; Koen Cuypers; Kirstin-Friederike Heise; Stephan P Swinnen; Inge Leunissen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.