Literature DB >> 22696543

Uncoupling response inhibition.

Hayley J Macdonald1, Cathy M Stinear, Winston D Byblow.   

Abstract

The ability to prevent unwanted movement is fundamental to human behavior. When healthy adults must prevent a subset of prepared actions, execution of the remaining response is markedly delayed. We hypothesized that the delay may be sensitive to the degree of similarity between the prevented and continued actions. Fifteen healthy participants performed an anticipatory response inhibition task that required bilateral index finger extension or thumb abduction with homogeneous digit pairings, or a heterogeneous pairing of a combination of the two movements. We expected that the uncoupling of responses required for selective movement prevention would be more difficult with homogeneous (same digit, homologous muscles) than heterogeneous pairings (different digits, nonhomologous muscles). Measures of response times (and asynchrony between digits) during action execution, stopping performance, and electromyography from EIP (index finger extension) and APB (thumb abduction) were analyzed. As expected, selective trials produced a delay in the remaining movement compared with execution trials. Successful performance in the selective condition occurred via suppression of the entire prepared response and subsequent selective reinitiation of the remaining component. Importantly, the delayed reinitiation of motor output was sensitive to the degree of similarity between responses, occurring later but at a faster rate with homogeneous digits. There were persistent aftereffects from the selective condition on the motor system, which indicated greater levels of inhibition and a higher gain were necessary to successfully perform selective trials with homogeneous pairings. Overall, the results support a model of inhibition of a unitary response and selective reinitiation, rather than selective inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696543     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01184.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cortical control and performance monitoring of interrupting and redirecting movements.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Aditya Murthy; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Proactive modulation of long-interval intracortical inhibition during response inhibition.

Authors:  Matthew J Cowie; Hayley J MacDonald; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Selective inhibition of a multicomponent response can be achieved without cost.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Zachary Westrick; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task.

Authors:  Alison Hall; Ned Jenkinson; Hayley J MacDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Authors:  Corey G Wadsley; John Cirillo; Arne Nieuwenhuys; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  A Single Mechanism for Global and Selective Response Inhibition under the Influence of Motor Preparation.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; René J Huster; Richard B Ivry; Ludovica Labruna; Mari S Messel; Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Saccade suppression exerts global effects on the motor system.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; H Sequoyah Reynoso; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural correlates of unpredictable Stop and non-Stop cues in overt and imagined execution.

Authors:  Alberto González-Villar; Santiago Galdo-Álvarez; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.348

10.  An Activation Threshold Model for Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Hayley J MacDonald; Angus J C McMorland; Cathy M Stinear; James P Coxon; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.