Literature DB >> 23066733

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI reveal cortical and subcortical interactions during stop-signal response inhibition.

Bram B Zandbelt1, Mirjam Bloemendaal, Janna Marie Hoogendam, René S Kahn, Matthijs Vink.   

Abstract

Stopping an action requires suppression of the primary motor cortex (M1). Inhibitory control over M1 relies on a network including the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) and the supplementary motor complex (SMC), but how these regions interact to exert inhibitory control over M1 is unknown. Specifically, the hierarchical position of the rIFC and SMC with respect to each other, the routes by which these regions control M1, and the causal involvement of these regions in proactive and reactive inhibition remain unclear. We used off-line repetitive TMS to perturb neural activity in the rIFC and SMC followed by fMRI to examine effects on activation in the networks involved in proactive and reactive inhibition, as assessed with a modified stop-signal task. We found repetitive TMS effects on reactive inhibition only. rIFC and SMC stimulation shortened the stop-signal RT (SSRT) and a shorter SSRT was associated with increased M1 deactivation. Furthermore, rIFC and SMC stimulation increased right striatal activation, implicating frontostriatal pathways in reactive inhibition. Finally, rIFC stimulation altered SMC activation, but SMC stimulation did not alter rIFC activation, indicating that rIFC lies upstream from SMC. These findings extend our knowledge about the functional organization of inhibitory control, an important component of executive functioning, showing that rIFC exerts reactive control over M1 via SMC and right striatum.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066733     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  48 in total

1.  Brain stimulation improves cognitive control by modulating medial-frontal activity and preSMA-vmPFC functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jiaxin Yu; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Shih-Wei Wu; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  A fronto-striato-subthalamic-pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition.

Authors:  Marjan Jahanshahi; Ignacio Obeso; John C Rothwell; José A Obeso
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Chronometric electrical stimulation of right inferior frontal cortex increases motor braking.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Christopher R Conner; Adam R Aron; Nitin Tandon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Benjamin Xu; Rita Volochayev; Oluwole Awosika; Wen-Tung Wang; John A Butman; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Inhibitory dysfunction contributes to some of the motor and non-motor symptoms of movement disorders and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Marjan Jahanshahi; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Proactive and reactive cognitive control rely on flexible use of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sephira G Ryman; Ansam A El Shaikh; Nicholas A Shaff; Faith M Hanlon; Andrew B Dodd; Christopher J Wertz; Josef M Ling; Deanna M Barch; Shannon F Stromberg; Denise S Lin; Swala Abrams; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Frontostriatal activity and connectivity increase during proactive inhibition across adolescence and early adulthood.

Authors:  Matthijs Vink; Bram B Zandbelt; Thomas Gladwin; Manon Hillegers; Janna Marie Hoogendam; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Stefan Du Plessis; René S Kahn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Speed of saccade execution and inhibition associated with fractional anisotropy in distinct fronto-frontal and fronto-striatal white matter pathways.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Fiona M Z van den Heiligenberg; R S Kahn; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Effects of working memory demand on neural mechanisms of motor response selection and control.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.