Literature DB >> 27277058

Multilayered tissue mimicking skin and vessel phantoms with tunable mechanical, optical, and acoustic properties.

Alvin I Chen1, Max L Balter1, Melanie I Chen2, Daniel Gross3, Sheikh K Alam4, Timothy J Maguire5, Martin L Yarmush1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper describes the design, fabrication, and characterization of multilayered tissue mimicking skin and vessel phantoms with tunable mechanical, optical, and acoustic properties. The phantoms comprise epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis skin layers, blood vessels, and blood mimicking fluid. Each tissue component may be individually tailored to a range of physiological and demographic conditions.
METHODS: The skin layers were constructed from varying concentrations of gelatin and agar. Synthetic melanin, India ink, absorbing dyes, and Intralipid were added to provide optical absorption and scattering in the skin layers. Bovine serum albumin was used to increase acoustic attenuation, and 40 μm diameter silica microspheres were used to induce acoustic backscatter. Phantom vessels consisting of thin-walled polydimethylsiloxane tubing were embedded at depths of 2-6 mm beneath the skin, and blood mimicking fluid was passed through the vessels. The phantoms were characterized through uniaxial compression and tension experiments, rheological frequency sweep studies, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, and ultrasonic pulse-echo measurements. Results were then compared to in vivo and ex vivo literature data.
RESULTS: The elastic and dynamic shear behavior of the phantom skin layers and vessel wall closely approximated the behavior of porcine skin tissues and human vessels. Similarly, the optical properties of the phantom tissue components in the wavelength range of 400-1100 nm, as well as the acoustic properties in the frequency range of 2-9 MHz, were comparable to human tissue data. Normalized root mean square percent errors between the phantom results and the literature reference values ranged from 1.06% to 9.82%, which for many measurements were less than the sample variability. Finally, the mechanical and imaging characteristics of the phantoms were found to remain stable after 30 days of storage at 21 °C.
CONCLUSIONS: The phantoms described in this work simulate the mechanical, optical, and acoustic properties of human skin tissues, vessel tissue, and blood. In this way, the phantoms are uniquely suited to serve as test models for multimodal imaging techniques and image-guided interventions.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27277058      PMCID: PMC4884191          DOI: 10.1118/1.4951729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  50 in total

1.  In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction.

Authors:  S. Diridollou; F. Patat; F. Gens; L. Vaillant; D. Black; J. M. Lagarde; Y. Gall; M. Berson
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Assessment of elastic parameters of human skin using dynamic elastography.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thérèse Baldeweck; Mickaël Tanter; Stefan Catheline; Mathias Fink; Laurent Sandrin; Céline Cornillon; Bernard Querleux
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Determining the optical properties of turbid mediaby using the adding-doubling method.

Authors:  S A Prahl; M J van Gemert; A J Welch
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 4.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Martin O Culjat; David Goldenberg; Priyamvada Tewari; Rahul S Singh
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

6.  Ultrasonic propagation properties of excised human skin.

Authors:  C M Moran; N L Bush; J C Bamber
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Elastic and acoustic properties of vessel mimicking material for elasticity imaging.

Authors:  C L de Korte; E I Céspedes; A F van der Steen; B Norder; K te Nijenhuis
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 8.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A realistic deformable prostate phantom for multimodal imaging and needle-insertion procedures.

Authors:  Nikolai Hungr; Jean-Alexandre Long; Vincent Beix; Jocelyne Troccaz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms with controllable optical, mechanical and structural properties for use in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Guy Lamouche; Brendan F Kennedy; Kelsey M Kennedy; Charles-Etienne Bisaillon; Andrea Curatolo; Gord Campbell; Valérie Pazos; David D Sampson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  21 in total

1.  Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure.

Authors:  Madeleine S Durkee; Landon D Nash; Fatemeh Nooshabadi; Jeffrey D Cirillo; Duncan J Maitland; Kristen C Maitland
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  3D Near Infrared and Ultrasound Imaging of Peripheral Blood Vessels for Real-Time Localization and Needle Guidance.

Authors:  Alvin I Chen; Max L Balter; Timothy J Maguire; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2016-10-02

3.  Automated end-to-end blood testing at the point-of-care: Integration of robotic phlebotomy with downstream sample processing.

Authors:  M L Balter; J M Leipheimer; A I Chen; A Shrirao; T J Maguire; M L Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2018-06

4.  System Design and Development of a Robotic Device for Automated Venipuncture and Diagnostic Blood Cell Analysis.

Authors:  Max L Balter; Alvin I Chen; Alex Fromholtz; Alex Gorshkov; Tim J Maguire; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Rep U S       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  Tissue-mimicking phantoms for performance evaluation of photoacoustic microscopy systems.

Authors:  Hsun-Chia Hsu; Keith A Wear; T Joshua Pfefer; William C Vogt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Tissue-mimicking phantom materials with tunable optical properties suitable for assessment of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy during electrosurgery.

Authors:  Sara Azizian Amiri; Pieter Van Berckel; Marco Lai; Jenny Dankelman; Benno H W Hendriks
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Evaluation of the robustness of cerebral oximetry to variations in skin pigmentation using a tissue-simulating phantom.

Authors:  Ali Afshari; Rolf B Saager; David Burgos; William C Vogt; Jianting Wang; Gonzalo Mendoza; Sandy Weininger; Kung-Bin Sung; Anthony J Durkin; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  First-in-human evaluation of a hand-held automated venipuncture device for rapid venous blood draws.

Authors:  Josh M Leipheimer; Max L Balter; Alvin I Chen; Enrique J Pantin; Alexander E Davidovich; Kristen S Labazzo; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2020-01-22

9.  Short-wave infrared light imaging measures tissue moisture and distinguishes superficial from deep burns.

Authors:  Sergey Mironov; Charles D Hwang; Jean Nemzek; John Li; Kavitha Ranganathan; Jonathan T Butts; David J Cholok; Vladislav A Dolgachev; Stewart C Wang; Mark Hemmila; Paul S Cederna; Michael D Morris; Omer Berenfeld; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  In-silico investigation towards the non-invasive optical detection of blood lactate.

Authors:  Subhasri Chatterjee; Karthik Budidha; Meha Qassem; Panicos A Kyriacou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.