Literature DB >> 27275090

Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse.

Jan J van Iersel1, Tim J C Paulides1, Paul M Verheijen1, John W Lumley1, Ivo A M J Broeders1, Esther C J Consten1.   

Abstract

External and internal rectal prolapse with their affiliated rectocele and enterocele, are associated with debilitating symptoms such as obstructed defecation, pelvic pain and faecal incontinence. Since perineal procedures are associated with a higher recurrence rate, an abdominal approach is commonly preferred. Despite the description of greater than three hundred different procedures, thus far no clear superiority of one surgical technique has been demonstrated. Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a relatively new and promising technique to correct rectal prolapse. In contrast to the abdominal procedures of past decades, VMR avoids posterolateral rectal mobilisation and thereby minimizes the risk of postoperative constipation. Because of a perceived acceptable recurrence rate, good functional results and low mesh-related morbidity in the short to medium term, VMR has been popularized in the past decade. Laparoscopic or robotic-assisted VMR is now being progressively performed internationally and several articles and guidelines propose the procedure as the treatment of choice for rectal prolapse. In this article, an outline of the current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for the treatment of internal and external rectal prolapse is presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological mesh; External rectal prolapse; Faecal incontinence; Internal rectal prolapse; Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy; Mesh erosion; Obstructed defecation; Rectal prolapse; Rectocele; Robot

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27275090      PMCID: PMC4886373          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.4977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  77 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Stapled transanal rectal resection to treat obstructed defecation caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele.

Authors:  A Renzi; D Izzo; G Di Sarno; G Izzo; N Di Martino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Technical and functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Prospective study in 54 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Thomas Auguste; Alain Dubreuil; Richard Bost; Bruno Bonaz; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2006-05

4.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Tomoyuki Ohta; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Hiroshi Kusanagi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.

Authors:  J Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; T Rautio; K Klintrup; H Takala; M Vierimaa; P Ohtonen; J Mäkelä
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Proficiency gain curve and predictors of outcome for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Authors:  Hugh Mackenzie; Anthony R Dixon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Luana Franceschilli; Elisabetta de Luca; Sara Lazzaro; Giulio P Angelucci; Valeria Fiaschetti; Carolina Pasecenic; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Urogenital consequences in ageing women.

Authors:  Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Eleftheria L Chrysanthopoulou
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.237

10.  Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

Authors:  Dominique E N M de Hoog; Jeroen Heemskerk; Fred H M Nieman; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G M I Baeten; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  26 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation in patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities-a Chinese pilot study.

Authors:  G Y Ye; Z Wang; K E Matzel; Z Cui
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Meta-analysis on current status, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse treatment: can robotic surgery become the gold standard?

Authors:  Xu Bao; Huan Wang; Weiliang Song; Yuzhuo Chen; Ying Luo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  High take-off intussusception or prolapse may have a poor outcome after standard ventral mesh rectopexy-a tailored approach is required.

Authors:  P J Tozer; C J Vaizey; J Grainger; J H Warusavitarne
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; T J C Paulides; N A Wijffels; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P C Sivathondan; D G Jayne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Long-term outcomes of robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Agathe Postillon; Cyril Perrenot; Adeline Germain; Marie-Lorraine Scherrer; Cyrille Buisset; Laurent Brunaud; Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Bernardina Fabiani; Alessandro Sturiale; Eleonora Russo; Tommaso Simoncini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-02

8.  Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  C S Inaba; S Sujatha-Bhaskar; C Y Koh; M D Jafari; S D Mills; J C Carmichael; M J Stamos; A Pigazzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh: short-term functional results.

Authors:  M Brunner; H Roth; K Günther; R Grützmann; K E Matzel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh for recurrent disorders of the posterior pelvic organ compartment.

Authors:  M Brunner; H Roth; K Günther; R Grützmann; Klaus E Matzel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.