Literature DB >> 33387168

Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse.

Gabriele Naldini1, Bernardina Fabiani1, Alessandro Sturiale2, Eleonora Russo3, Tommaso Simoncini3.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery is safe and effective to treat the complex pelvic organs prolapse (C-POP). The present study analyzes all the robotic procedures and their advantages in the treatment of C-POP performed in a Proctologic and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre. All the patients affected by C-POP who had robot-assisted surgery were retrospective analyzed. The anatomical and functional outcomes were respectively evaluated through POP-Q grading system and Wexner score about constipation and incontinence. The satisfaction rate was investigated using a five-point scale. From September 2014 to December 2018, 229 women underwent robotic surgery. The follow-up was 12 months. There were no robot-related complications. One hematoma (4.5%) of the recto-vaginal space occurred after Robotic Ventral Rectopexy with Folded Mesh (R-VRP-FM). In the robotic assisted lateral suspension (R-ALS) group there was one case of anterior vaginal wall mesh exposure (0.9%). After the robotic ventral rectopexy (R-VRP) the recurrence rate of external rectal prolapse, internal rectal prolapse, rectocele and enterocele was respectively 6.6, 9.5, 7.4 and 9.5%. After R-VRP-FM only one cystocele (14%) and one partial rectal prolapse (25%) recurred. Vaginal bulge symptoms resolution rate was 95.4%. The mean Wexner constipation score significantly decreased after R-VRP and R-VRP-FM. Vaginal bulge symptoms improved in 98.3% of cases with any apical prolapse recurrence after robotic abdominal colposacropexy. Success rate after R-ALS was 99.1% and 96.4% for apical and anterior prolapse respectively. Robotic assistance makes some surgical steps easier and more precise and this may result in less morbidity and better results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted lateral suspension; Colposacropexy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Robotic surgery; Ventral rectopexy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33387168     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00913-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  38 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).

Authors:  Stuart R Cairns; John H Scholefield; Robert J Steele; Malcolm G Dunlop; Huw J W Thomas; Gareth D Evans; Jayne A Eaden; Matthew D Rutter; Wendy P Atkin; Brian P Saunders; Anneke Lucassen; Paul Jenkins; Peter D Fairclough; Christopher R J Woodhouse
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task performance.

Authors:  Sunil M Prasad; Sandip M Prasad; Hersh S Maniar; Celeste Chu; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Why complex pelvic organ prolapse should be repaired vaginally.

Authors:  Ralph Chesson; Barry Hallner
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Ramage; P Georgiou; P Tekkis; E Tan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Imaging the pelvic floor.

Authors:  G A Santoro
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance.

Authors:  Ashwin L deSouza; Leela M Prasad; Slawomir J Marecik; Jennifer Blumetti; John J Park; Andrea Zimmern; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Kristina Cvach; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Mick Harper; Stuart Hall; Nuno Figueiredo; Tahseen Qureshi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.