Literature DB >> 16801887

Technical and functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Prospective study in 54 consecutive patients.

Thomas Auguste1, Alain Dubreuil, Richard Bost, Bruno Bonaz, Jean-Luc Faucheron.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse offers short-term advantages compared with operations performed by laparotomy. The aim of this prospective study was to report technical and functional outcome after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory in consecutive patients operated on by a single surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 1996 to July 2004, 54 consecutive patients (47 women), median age 53 years (range: 16-84 years), underwent laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Preoperative evaluation included physical examination, dynamic videoproctography and, in patients with constipation, colonic transit time (with radiopaque markers). Postoperative evaluation included the same examinations and a simple global quality-of-life questionnaire.
RESULTS: Conversion to laparotomy was required for three patients during the learning curve. Median duration of operation was 157 minutes (range: 50-370). There was no mortality and morbidity was 5.5% (brachial plexus palsy in two patients and urinary tract infection in one). Median hospital stay was 3.5 days (range: 1-11). There were 4 recurrences (7.4%). Functional outcome at 12 months showed the presence of constipation in 20.3% of patients (persistence in eight and de novo in three) and the presence of outlet obstruction in 25.9% of patients (persistence in six and de novo in eight). Anal continence improved in 72.4% of the 29 patients who complained of this symptom. The global quality-of-life questionnaire showed a satisfactory result in 96% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory is a safe and efficient procedure to treat complete rectal prolapse; morbidity is low. Functional outcome is at least equivalent to that obtained with open procedures in terms of continence, constipation and outlet obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16801887     DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73257-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol        ISSN: 0399-8320


  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in children: a new simplified technique.

Authors:  Rafik Shalaby; Maged Ismail; Mohamad Abdelaziz; Refaat Ibrahem; Khaled Hefny; Abdelaziz Yehya; Abdelghany Essa
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  New-onset rectoanal intussusceptions after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a normal image?

Authors:  B Trilling; J-L Faucheron
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; John W Lumley; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: Technical and functional results.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Faucheron; Bertrand Trilling; Edouard Girard; Pierre-Yves Sage; Sandrine Barbois; Fabian Reche
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Sileri; Luana Franceschilli; Elisabetta de Luca; Sara Lazzaro; Giulio P Angelucci; Valeria Fiaschetti; Carolina Pasecenic; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for the treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome and/or faecal incontinence in patients with internal rectal prolapse: a critical appraisal of the first 100 cases.

Authors:  L Franceschilli; D Varvaras; I Capuano; C I Ciangola; F Giorgi; G Boehm; A L Gaspari; P Sileri
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Day case laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, safe, and cost effective for selected patients.

Authors:  V Vijay; J Halbert; A Zissimopoulos; S Siddiqi; S Warren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  New-onset rectoanal intussusception may not result in symptomatic improvement after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; T Takahashi; T Ohta; W Fujii; H Kusanagi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Sexual, bladder and bowel function following different minimally invasive techniques of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  K Baessler; S Windemut; V Chiantera; C Köhler; J Sehouli
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.405

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.