Literature DB >> 27272235

Abnormal heart rate response with vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Relevance to clinical practice.

Habib A Dakik1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27272235     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-016-0561-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The prognostic value of the heart rate response to adenosine in relation to diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Phillip Dean; Vikas Bhatia; Fahad Iqbal; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Prognostic value of adenosine Tl-201 myocardial perfusion imaging after acute myocardial infarction: results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Habib A Dakik; Juliet A Wendt; Kay Kimball; Craig M Pratt; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A blunted heart rate response to regadenoson is an independent prognostic indicator in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Phillip Dean; Fahad Iqbal; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prognostic impact of hemodynamic response to adenosine in patients older than age 55 years undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion study.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; Chee Keong Ng; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Intensive medical therapy versus coronary angioplasty for suppression of myocardial ischemia in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective, randomized pilot study.

Authors:  H A Dakik; N S Kleiman; J A Farmer; Z X He; J A Wendt; C M Pratt; M S Verani; J J Mahmarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Siddharth Singh; Ayman Farag; Stephanie El-Hajj; Jack Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Impact of integrating heart rate response with perfusion imaging on the prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Javier Gomez; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Tania Campagnoli; Amjad Ali; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.952
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.