Literature DB >> 26940574

The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Navkaranbir S Bajaj1, Siddharth Singh2, Ayman Farag1, Stephanie El-Hajj3, Jack Heo1, Ami E Iskandrian1, Fadi G Hage4,5.   

Abstract

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an established diagnostic test that provides useful prognostic data in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In more than half of the patients referred for stress testing, vasodilator stress is used in lieu of exercise. Unlike exercise, vasodilator stress does not provide information on exercise and functional capacity, heart rate recovery, and chronotropy, and ECG changes are less frequent. These non-perfusion data provide important prognostic and patient management information. Further, event rates in patients undergoing vasodilator MPI are higher than in those undergoing exercise MPI and even in those with normal images probably due to higher pretest risk. However, there are a number of non-perfusion variables that are obtained during vasodilator stress testing, which have prognostic relevance but their use has not been well emphasized. The purpose of this review is to summarize the prognostic values of these non-perfusion data obtained during vasodilator MPI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial perfusion imaging; SPECT; heart rate response; perfusion; transient ischemic dilation; vasodilator

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26940574     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0441-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  143 in total

1.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Himanshu Aggarwal; Wael A AlJaroudi; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn Mannon; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Coronary vascular dysfunction and prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Masanao Naya; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Mariya Gaber; Sharmila Dorbala; David M Charytan; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

4.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

5.  Beneficial effect of oestrogen on exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia in women with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  G M Rosano; P M Sarrel; P A Poole-Wilson; P Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-07-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction disturbances.

Authors:  Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Stuart Smallheiser; Ji Chen; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Jaekyeong Heo; Robert A Pagnanelli; E Lindsey Tauxe; Ernest V Garcia; Fabio Esteves; Frank Seghatol-Eslami; G Neal Kay; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes during vasodilator stress testing in patients with normal SPECT images.

Authors:  Elizabeth Klodas; Todd D Miller; Timothy F Christian; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Reclassification of cardiovascular risk in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging using heart rate response to vasodilator stress.

Authors:  Fahad M Iqbal; Wael Al Jaroudi; Kumar Sanam; Aaron Sweeney; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Caffeine Consumption and Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Response to Regadenoson.

Authors:  Abbas Bitar; Ronald Mastouri; Rolf P Kreutz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher W Ives; Wael A AlJaroudi; Vineeta Kumar; Ayman Farag; Dana V Rizk; Suzanne Oparil; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Cases from a busy nuclear cardiology laboratory.

Authors:  Jeremy S White; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Multi-modality imaging: Bird's eye view from the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Steven G Lloyd; Farooq A Chaudhry; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians: Safety, tolerability, and long-term prognostic implications of hemodynamic response and SPECT-related variables.

Authors:  Athanasios Katsikis; Athanasios Theodorakos; Spyridon Papaioannou; Antonios Kalkinis; Genovefa Kolovou; Konstantinos Konstantinou; Maria Koutelou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Abnormal heart rate response with vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Relevance to clinical practice.

Authors:  Habib A Dakik
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The blood pressure response to vasodilator stress does not provide independent prognostic information.

Authors:  Eliana Reyes; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Risk stratification for renal transplantation: A role for heart rate response?

Authors:  Matthew Topel; Leslee J Shaw; Joe X Xie
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Myocardial stunning by gated SPECT: An old tool reinvented in a stunning turn.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.